Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:59:31.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Initial Public Offerings of State-Owned Enterprises: An International Study of Policy Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Swee-Sum Lam
Affiliation:
bizlamss@nus.edu.sg, National University of Singapore, Business School, 1 Business Link, Singapore, 117592
Ruth Seow-Kuan Tan
Affiliation:
biztansk@nus.edu.sg, National University of Singapore, Business School, 1 Business Link, Singapore, 117592
Glenn Tsao-Min Wee
Affiliation:
glenn.wee@citigroup.com, Citigroup Private Bank, 23 Church Street, #08–01 Capital Square, Singapore, 049481.

Abstract

Policy risk, rather than information asymmetry, explains the cross-sectional underpricing of privatized initial public offerings. The issuer governments of high policy risk issues tend to retain a large equity stake and underprice more with underpricing increasing in retained equity. While the issuer government's retained equity is an observable signal for policy risk, we find that the quality of a country's bureaucratic machinery is a more intuitive and practical measure of policy risk. Policy risk also explains the absence of a systematic relation between the initial returns on privatized and private initial public offerings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. A.The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (1970), 488500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, F., and Faulhaber, G. R.. “Signaling by Underpricing in the IPO Market.” Journal of Financial Economics, 23 (1989), 303323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aussenegg, W.Privatization versus Private Sector Initial Public Offerings in Poland.” Multinational Finance Journal, 4 (2001), 6999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D. P.A Model of the Demand for Investment Banking Advising and Distribution Services for New Issues.” Journal of Finance, 37 (1982), 955976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, R. P., and Ritter, J. R.. “Investment Banking, Reputation and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (1986), 213232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boycko, M.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. Privatizing Russia. Cambridge MA: MIT Press (1995).Google Scholar
Brada, J.Privatisation is Transition—Or is It?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (1996), 6786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., and Nam, S.. “The Short-Run Performance of IPOs of Privately and Publicly Owned Firms: International EvidenceMultinational Finance Journal, 2 (1998), 225244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhry, B., and Sherman, A.. “International Differences in Oversubscription and Underpricing of IPOs.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 2 (1996), 359381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coval, J., and Moskowitz, T.. “Home Bias at Home: Local Preference in Domestic Portfolios.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 20452073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coval, J., and Moskowitz, T.. “The Geography of Investment: Informed Trading and Asset Prices.” Journal of Political Economy, 109 (2001), 811841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K.. “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Political Economy, 93 (1985), 11551177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewenter, K., and Malatesta, P. H.. “Public Offerings of State-owned and Privately-owned Enterprises: An International Comparison.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 16591679.Google Scholar
French, K., and Poterba, J.. “Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets.” American Economic Review, 81 (1991), 222226.Google Scholar
Grinblatt, M., and Hwang, C. Y.. “Signaling and the Pricing of New Issues.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 393420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinblatt, M., and Keloharju, M.. ”How Distance, Language and Culture Influence Stockholdings and Trades.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 10531073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelberg, C. P.; Hubbard, G. R.; and Palia, D.. “Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 53 (1999), 353384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Q., and Levich, R. M.. “Underpricing of New Equity Offerings by Privatised Firms: An International Test.” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 6 (2003), 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, G.Familiarity Breeds Investment.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 659680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Country Risk Guide. Syracuse, NY: Political Risk Services (January 1984–12 2002).Google Scholar
Jacquillat, B.Nationalization and Privatisation in Contemporary France.” Government Union Review, 8 (1987), 2150.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, T., and Mayer, C.. “The Privatization Process in France and the U.K.European Economic Review, 32 (1988), 482490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. L.; Megginson, W. L.; Nash, R. C.; and Netter, J. M.. “Share Issue Privatisations as Financial Means to Political and Economic Ends.” Journal of Financial Economics, 53 (1999), 217253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; López-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Legal Determinants of External Finance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 11311150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; López-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy, 196 (1998), 11131155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; López-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15 (1999), 222279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; López-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Investor Protection and Corporate Governance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (2000), 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland, H. E., and Pyle, D. H.. “Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure and Financial Intermediation.” Journal of Finance, 32 (1977), 371387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljungqvist, A. P.; Jenkinson, T.; and Wilhelm, W. J. JrGlobal Integration of Primary Equity Markets: The Role of U.S. Banks and U.S. Investors.” Review of Financial Studies, 16 (2003), 6399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megginson, W. L., and Netter, J. M.. “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2001), 321389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menyah, K., and Paudyal, K.. “Share Issue Privatisations: The UK Experience.” In Empirical Issues in Raising Equity Capital, Levis, M., ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science (1996).Google Scholar
Mok, H. M. K., and Hui, Y. V.. “Underpricing and Aftermarket Performance of IPOs in Shanghai, China.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 6 (1998), 453474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paudyal, K.; Saadouni, B.; and Briston, R. J.. “Privatisation Initial Public Offerings in Malaysia: Initial Premium and Long-Term Performance.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 6 (1998), 427451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perotti, E. C.Credible Privatization.” American Economic Review, 85 (1995), 847859.Google Scholar
Perotti, E. C., and Guney, S. E.. “The Structure of Privatization Plans.” Financial Management, 22 (1993), 8498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, K.Why New Issues are Underpriced.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (1986), 187212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, G., and Verdier, T.. “Privatization in Eastern Europe: Irreversibility and Critical Mass Effects.” Journal of Public Economics, 54 (1994), 161183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, J., and Yarrow, G.. “Economic Perspectives on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1991), 111132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, I.Seasoned Offerings, Imitation Costs, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Finance 44 (1989), 421449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar