Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:24:04.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Onset of Darcy–Bénard convection under throughflow of a shear-thinning fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2020

D. Petrolo
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering and Architecture, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 181/A, 43124Parma, Italy
L. Chiapponi
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering and Architecture, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 181/A, 43124Parma, Italy
S. Longo
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering and Architecture, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 181/A, 43124Parma, Italy
M. Celli
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136Bologna, Italy
A. Barletta
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136Bologna, Italy
V. Di Federico*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136Bologna, Italy
*
Email address for correspondence: vittorio.difederico@unibo.it

Abstract

We present an investigation on the onset of Darcy–Bénard instability in a two-dimensional porous medium saturated with a non-Newtonian fluid and heated from below in the presence of a uniform horizontal pressure gradient. The fluid is taken to be of power-law nature with constant rheological index $n$ and temperature-dependent consistency index $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}^{\ast }$. A two-dimensional linear stability analysis in the vertical plane yields the critical wavenumber and the generalised critical Rayleigh number as functions of dimensionless problem parameters, with a non-monotonic dependence from $n$ and with maxima/minima at given values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$, a parameter representing the effects of consistency index variations due to temperature. A series of experiments are conducted in a Hele-Shaw cell of aspect ratio $H/b=13.3{-}20$ to provide a verification of the theory. Xanthan Gum mixtures (nominal concentration from 0.10 % to 0.20 %) are employed as working fluids with a parameter range $n=0.55{-}0.72$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{0}^{\ast }=0.02{-}0.10~\text{Pa}~\text{s}^{n}$. The experimental critical wavenumber corresponding to incipient instability of the convective cells is derived via image analysis for different values of the imposed horizontal velocity. Theoretical results for critical wavenumber favourably compare with experiments, systematically underestimating their experimental counterparts by 10 % at most. The discrepancy between experiments and theory is more relevant for the critical Rayleigh number, with theory overestimating the experiments by a maximum factor less than two. Discrepancies are attributable to a combination of factors: nonlinear phenomena, possible subcritical bifurcations, and unaccounted-for disturbing effects such as approximations in the rheological model, wall slip, ageing and degradation of the fluid properties.

Type
JFM Rapids
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

1 Introduction

Thermal instability of saturated porous media has been intensively investigated with analytical tools (for a survey see Rees (Reference Rees, Vafai and Hadim2000), Nield & Bejan (Reference Nield and Bejan2013)) since the early studies of Horton & Rogers (Reference Horton and Rogers1945) and Lapwood (Reference Lapwood1948), subsequently extended to include parallel horizontal flow (Prats Reference Prats1966). Different combinations of boundary conditions are adopted in the literature for heat flux, temperature and permeability (Nield Reference Nield1968); the fluid is usually taken to be Newtonian.

Recent literature further broadens the analysis to cover non-Newtonian fluids, from power law (Hirata & Ouarzazi Reference Hirata and Ouarzazi2010; Barletta & Nield Reference Barletta and Nield2011; Nield Reference Nield2011a ,Reference Nield b ; Alloui et al. Reference Alloui, Khelifa, Beji and Vasseur2012; Alves & Barletta Reference Alves and Barletta2013; Barletta & Storesletten Reference Barletta and Storesletten2016; Celli et al. Reference Celli, Barletta, Longo, Chiapponi, Ciriello, Di Federico and Valiani2017), to Bingham (Rees Reference Rees and Vafai2015) or viscoelastic (Hirata et al. Reference Hirata, Alves, Delenda and Ouarzazi2015); this entails additional complexity deriving from fluid rheology.

From an experimental viewpoint, Rayleigh–Bénard convection in porous media has been studied by means of the Hele-Shaw analog model (see, for example, Hartline & Lister (Reference Hartline and Lister1977), Cherkaoui & Wilcock (Reference Cherkaoui and Wilcock2001) and Letelier et al. (Reference Letelier, Herrera, Mujica and Ortega2016)), originally developed for Newtonian fluids and recently extended to non-Newtonian power-law fluids (Longo, Di Federico & Chiapponi Reference Longo, Di Federico and Chiapponi2015; Ciriello et al. Reference Ciriello, Longo, Chiapponi and Di Federico2016): the porous medium is replaced with a small gap between two flat plates; this entails advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, experiments are easily prepared and the flow characteristics conveniently measured; on the other hand, simplifying assumptions on the structure of the simulated porous medium are needed. Direct experiments were performed simulating the porous medium with glass ballotini (see, for example, Lister (Reference Lister1990) and Keene & Goldstein (Reference Keene and Goldstein2015)). The onset of convection in viscoplastic fluids, including the effects of wall slip, was analysed by Métivier & Magnin (Reference Métivier and Magnin2011) and Darbouli et al. (Reference Darbouli, Métivier, Piau, Magnin and Abdelali2013); a more complex scenario, with Carbopol behaving like a single or a double-phase continuum, has been analysed in Métivier, Li & Magnin (Reference Métivier, Li and Magnin2017).

Several measurement techniques have been used for detecting the onset of instability, such as shadography (for example, Darbouli et al. Reference Darbouli, Métivier, Piau, Magnin and Abdelali2013), variation of thermal flux induced by convection (for example, Schmidt & Milverton Reference Schmidt and Milverton1935), visualisation through a pH-indicator (Hartline & Lister Reference Hartline and Lister1977), magnetic resonance imaging (Shattuck et al. Reference Shattuck, Behringer, Johnson and Georgiadis1995), digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) (Kebiche, Castelain & Burghelea Reference Kebiche, Castelain and Burghelea2014), holographic real-time interferometry (Koster & Müller Reference Koster and Müller1982). Despite the accurate set-up and the sophisticated instruments used, the overall accuracy in detecting instabilities is usually quite limited. This is partly a consequence of the fact that the dimensionless groups, relevant to describe the physical process of incipient convection, involve numerous variables, and each of these has its own uncertainty. In addition, detecting an instability at its onset is, by definition, a challenge: instabilities are linear at the very beginning, and induce a tiny modulation of velocity, thermal flux or refraction index. Detection of instabilities, however, takes place in many cases during the nonlinear stage, whereas many theories refer to incipient linear instability.

For non-Newtonian fluids, additional complexities arise from measurement issues and uncertainty on rheological parameters, often in the presence of disturbing effects such as slipping, ageing and deterioration of the fluid under a prolonged thermal gradient. Further, most of the models adopted to describe non-Newtonian fluids are a strong simplification of the constituent equations, invariably referred to viscometric flow fields and subject to distortion in non-viscometric, complex three-dimensional flow fields. In this respect, there were some attempts to measure the rheological material properties in non-conventional rheometers, like the experimental apparatus to be used for the main experiments in this work (Celli et al. Reference Celli, Barletta, Longo, Chiapponi, Ciriello, Di Federico and Valiani2017).

The aim of this work is comparing theoretical simulation with experimental results in Rayleigh–Bénard convection of a non-Newtonian power-law fluid within a vertical porous layer heated from below and subject to horizontal cross-flow – a configuration common in several natural settings. The experimental set-up is composed by a Hele-Shaw cell, and correspondingly the basic solution and linear stability analysis are derived for a two-dimensional geometry. The manuscript is structured as follows. Section 2 includes the mathematical formulation of the problem and the linear stability analysis. The experimental set-up and the measurement techniques are described in § 3, while § 4 illustrates the experimental results. The discussion and the conclusions are presented in § 5, together with some perspectives for future work. Supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.84 contains details on uncertainties of the experimental results.

Figure 1. Sketch of the simulated domain.

2 Mathematical model

2.1 Governing equations

The theoretical simulation is focused on the two-dimensional linear stability analysis of a fluid saturated horizontal porous layer of height $H$ , see figure 1. The horizontal boundary planes are assumed to be impermeable and isothermal at temperature $T_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x0394}T$ , lower boundary, and $T_{0}$ , upper boundary. Darcy’s law generalised for non-Newtonian power-law fluids is here employed together with the Oberbeck–Boussinesq approximation. Local thermal equilibrium between the solid and the fluid phase is assumed and a convection–diffusion energy balance is used to model the heat transfer. The balance equations and the boundary conditions can be written in the dimensionless form

(2.1) $$\begin{eqnarray}\left.\begin{array}{@{}c@{}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D735}\boldsymbol{\cdot }\boldsymbol{u}=0,\\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D735}\times [\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}(T)|\boldsymbol{u}|^{n-1}\boldsymbol{u}]=Ra\unicode[STIX]{x1D735}\times (T\boldsymbol{e}_{y}),\\ \displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}T}{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}t}+\boldsymbol{u}\boldsymbol{\cdot }\unicode[STIX]{x1D735}T=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FB}^{2}T,\\ y=0:\quad v=0,T=1,\quad \text{and}\quad y=1:\quad v=0,T=0\end{array}\right\}\end{eqnarray}$$

by introducing the transformations

(2.2a-d ) $$\begin{eqnarray}(x,y)\rightarrow H(x,y),\quad (u,v)\rightarrow {\displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D718}}{H}}(u,v),\quad t\rightarrow {\displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}H^{2}}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D718}}}t,\quad T\rightarrow (T_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x0394}T)T.\end{eqnarray}$$

The Rayleigh number $Ra$ is defined as

(2.3) $$\begin{eqnarray}Ra=\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{0}g\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\unicode[STIX]{x0394}TKH^{n}}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{0}^{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D718}^{n}}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Here, $\boldsymbol{u}$ is the seepage velocity having Cartesian components $(u,v)$ , and $(x,y)$ are the Cartesian coordinates, with $y$ denoting the vertical axis, $T$ is the temperature, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}^{\ast }$ is the consistency index of the fluid and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{0}^{\ast }$ (SI unit ( $\text{Pa s}^{n}$ )) denotes the value of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}^{\ast }$ evaluated at reference temperature $T_{0}$ , $n$ is the power-law index, $K$ is the permeability (with SI unit $\text{m}^{n+1}$ ), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{0}$ is the fluid density at the reference temperature $T_{0}$ , $\boldsymbol{g}$ is the gravitational acceleration (of modulus $g$ ), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ is the thermal expansion coefficient of the fluid, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$ is the ratio between the average volumetric heat capacity of the porous medium and the volumetric heat capacity of the fluid, and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D718}$ is the average thermal diffusivity of the saturated porous medium. We assume here the following dependence of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$ on $T$ (Nowak, Gryglaszewski & Stacharska-Targosz Reference Nowak, Gryglaszewski and Stacharska-Targosz1982; Celli et al. Reference Celli, Barletta, Longo, Chiapponi, Ciriello, Di Federico and Valiani2017):

(2.4) $$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}(T)={\displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}^{\ast }(T)}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{0}^{\ast }}}=(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\,Ra\,T)^{-n},\end{eqnarray}$$

where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ is a non-negative dimensionless parameter that tunes the departure from the constant consistency index model, namely

(2.5) $$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{0}^{\ast }\,\unicode[STIX]{x1D718}^{n}\,\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{0}\,g\,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\,K\,H^{n}},\end{eqnarray}$$

where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}$ is a fluid property (with unit $\text{K}^{-1}$ ) modulating the slope of the temperature change. In passing, we note that an exponential dependence is modelled in Darbouli et al. (Reference Darbouli, Métivier, Leclerc, Nouar, Bouteera and Stemmelen2016). A comparison between the two models is reported in the supplementary material, showing that both models can be used, with a similar agreement between experimental data and interpolating function.

2.2 Basic solution and stability analysis

The stability analysis has to be performed on a stationary solution of the balance equations (2.1). This solution is the so-called basic state, here denoted by the subscript  $b$ . The stationary solution of (2.1) here considered as basic state is

(2.6) $$\begin{eqnarray}u_{b}=Pe\left[1+{\displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\,Ra\,(1-2\,y)}{2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\,Ra}}\right],\quad v_{b}=0,\quad T_{b}=1-y,\end{eqnarray}$$

where $\boldsymbol{u}_{b}=\{u_{b},v_{b}\}$ is the basic state velocity vector, and the Péclet number is defined as the mean velocity of the basic flow, given by

(2.7) $$\begin{eqnarray}Pe=\int _{0}^{1}u_{b}\,\text{d}y.\end{eqnarray}$$

As the experimental set-up is composed by a Hele-Shaw cell, the basic state in (2.6) and (2.7) is two-dimensional. Accordingly, in the following, a two-dimensional linear stability analysis in the plane $(x,y)$ is performed.

The basic state is thus perturbed by small-amplitude disturbances, namely

(2.8) $$\begin{eqnarray}\boldsymbol{u}=\boldsymbol{u}_{b}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}\,\boldsymbol{U},\quad T=T_{b}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}\,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E9},\end{eqnarray}$$

where $\boldsymbol{U}=(U,V)$ is the perturbation velocity, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E9}$ is the perturbation temperature, and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}$ is a parameter such that $|\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}|\ll 1$ . The streamfunction, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F9}(x,y)$ , formulation can be employed to simplify the problem, with $U=\unicode[STIX]{x2202}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F9}/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}y$ and $V=-\unicode[STIX]{x2202}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F9}/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}x$ . The perturbations can now be expressed in terms of normal modes, namely

(2.9) $$\begin{eqnarray}\left\{\begin{array}{@{}l@{}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F9}(x,y,t)\\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D6E9}(x,y,t)\end{array}\right\}=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}l@{}}f(y)\\ h(y)\end{array}\right\}\exp (\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}\,t)\exp [\text{i}(k\,x-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\,t)].\end{eqnarray}$$

One can substitute (2.8) and (2.9) into (2.1) to obtain

(2.10) $$\begin{eqnarray}\left.\begin{array}{@{}c@{}}n(n-1)Gu_{b}^{\prime }\,f^{\prime }+nu_{b}[Gf^{\prime \prime }+G^{\prime }(f^{\prime }-hu_{b}^{\prime })]-k^{2}Gu_{b}\,f\\ -u_{b}^{2}(G^{\prime \prime }h+G^{\prime }h^{\prime })+\text{i}kRau_{b}^{2-n}h=0,\\ h^{\prime \prime }-h(k^{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}-\text{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+\text{i}ku_{b})-\text{i}kf=0,\quad \text{with }f=0,h=0\text{ at }y=0,1,\end{array}\right\}\end{eqnarray}$$

where the primes denote derivatives with respect to $y$ and $G(y)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}(T_{b}(y))$ . We note that, due to (2.10), we have $\text{d}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}(T_{b})/\text{d}T_{b}=-G^{\prime }(y)$ .

2.3 Derivation of critical wavenumber and Rayleigh number

The solution of (2.10) is obtained numerically by employing the same procedure used in Celli et al. (Reference Celli, Barletta, Longo, Chiapponi, Ciriello, Di Federico and Valiani2017). The critical values of the Rayleigh number and of the wavenumber are reported in figures 2 and 3 as functions of the parameter $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ for different values of the power-law index $n$ and of the Péclet number. As $Pe$ increases, these figures illustrate the non-monotonic behaviour of $Ra_{c}$ and $k_{c}$ versus $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ .

Figure 2. Critical values of the Rayleigh number.

Figure 3. Critical values of the wavenumber.

Figure 4. Layout of the Hele-Shaw cell.

3 Experimental set-up

Validation of the model was performed by comparison of the theoretical results achieved in § 2 with experimental results obtained with an analogue model consisting of a Hele-Shaw cell 80 cm long and 4 cm high; its design is similar to Hartline & Lister (Reference Hartline and Lister1977), see figure 4(a,b). A frame of aluminium held together two polycarbonate windows 0.8 cm thick, with a gap variable between 0.1 and 0.3 cm controlled by aluminium shims. The upper and lower frames were cooled and heated, respectively, by a water flux within PVC pipes inserted into the frame. Temperature control within 0.1 K was achieved via two thermostatic baths. The temperature was measured with two probes inserted in the upper and lower side of the frame: PT100 4 wires AA 1/3DIN with a nominal accuracy of 0.1 K at 273 K. The probes were calibrated in a limited range of temperature with a maximum uncertainty of 0.08 K, hence the error on the temperature difference between the two frames is 0.12 K. The cell is insulated with foam rubber in order to avoid lateral dispersion – except for a window in the central section to allow observation of the fluid flow. The uniform horizontal velocity component, representing the basic flow, was obtained by injecting fluid with a syringe pump in one of the two wells, with overflow in the other well. The visualisation of the flow field was obtained with a tracer having the same composition as the fluid within the cell, i.e. water and Xanthan Gum (nominal concentration in the range 0.10 %–0.20 %, the actual one is a little smaller because the mixture was filtered to eliminate some lumps for homogeneity), added with aniline dye. The tracer was injected through several small holes with diameter less than 0.1 mm in a PVC pipe inserted in one of the polycarbonate windows, positioned at mid-height of the window. The pipe was connected to two small tanks, periodically refilled with tracer fluid, in order to guarantee a constant and uniform injection. The images were acquired with a USB video camera ( $1280~\text{pixel}\times 960~\text{pixel}$ ) with microscope lenses, with a field of view (FOV) of ${\approx}12\times 10~\text{cm}^{2}$ . The FOV was illuminated by a lamp with rays made parallel through a lens, in order to increase resolution and sharpness. The video camera acquired a single frame each 30–60 s. The overall process was controlled by a PC with a DAQ board, storing temperature measurements at a data rate of 10 Hz, and controlling the USB image acquisition. Tracer was progressively injected and the temperature set-up was increased/lowered for the hot/cold thermostatic bath, with steps of 0.1 K each 2–3 min. Variations of the upper/lower temperature were fixed in order to have a constant (or almost constant) temperature $T_{0.5}$ in the mid section. Most experiments lasted for 3–4 h, with a time gradient of temperature of less than $10^{-3}~\text{K}~\text{s}^{-1}$ . A typical time series of measured temperatures is shown in the supplementary material, as well as details of rheometric measurements and experimental uncertainties.

Table 1. Parameters of the experiments. Here, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{0}$ is the reference mass density at a temperature of 298 K, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{0}^{\ast }$ is the fluid consistency index, evaluated at the reference temperature $T_{0}$ , $n$ is the fluid behaviour index, $b$ is the gap width, $\overline{u}_{b}$ is the average basic horizontal velocity, $T_{0.5}$ is the temperature in the mid section $z/H=0.5$ during experiments (minimum/maximum value), $Pe$ is the Péclet number, $Ra_{c,exp}$ is the experimental critical Rayleigh number, $k_{c,exp}$ is the dimensionless critical wavenumber. Expt., experiment.

4 Experimental results

The experiments and their parameters are listed in table 1. Figure 5 shows a typical sequence of frames from the early stages of instability development to the appearance of strongly nonlinear instabilities. A slow translation to the left is observed due to the basic flow velocity of $0.0087~\text{cm}~\text{s}^{-1}$ . Similar results were obtained for all tests. In most cases, the temperature difference between the two frames first showed an increase over time, followed by a reduction, with consequent linearisation of the convective cells up to their disappearance. Hysteresis phenomena, with a difference in temperature at the early appearance of the cell (branch of rising $\unicode[STIX]{x0394}T$ ) higher than the difference in temperature corresponding to the return to stability (branch of reducing $\unicode[STIX]{x0394}T$ ), were evident only for the more viscous fluid flow. The description of the methodology adopted for comparison gives evidence of the numerous experimental complexities encountered during the activity.

Figure 6(a,b) shows the comparison between the theoretical and experimental critical Rayleigh number for two different groups of experiments with different values of the Péclet number $Pe$ . The error bars are shown for the experiments and represent one standard deviation. The theoretical predictions are supplemented with confidence limits corresponding to the possible combinations of the variables and parameters involved in the model, assumed equal to their nominal value plus/minus their standard deviation.

The value of theoretical $Ra_{c}$ increases for increasing fluid behaviour index, although not monotonically for the larger value of $Pe$ considered; also, an increase in $Pe$ brings about an increase in $Ra_{c}$ , albeit not in the same proportion for different values of $n$ . These theoretical values consistently overpredict experimental values to various degrees, from approximately 15 % to nearly 100 %; no clear trend is detected in the discrepancy for different values of $n$ and/or $Pe$ . The experimental values of $Ra_{c}$ obtained show a non-monotonic behaviour with fluid behaviour index $n$ ; for both $Pe$ values, a minimum for $Ra_{c}$ is evident at $n=0.6$ .

Figure 5. Evolution of the perturbation over time (top to bottom and left to right) for one of the experiments. The vertical lines delimit squares with side length equal to $H=4~\text{cm}$ . In the final frame (bottom right) a bifurcation of the cell in a strongly nonlinear regime is observed. Snapshots are 60 s apart.

Figure 6. Comparison of the experimental and theoretical values of the critical Rayleigh number (a) for $Pe=34\pm 2$ and (b) for $Pe=52\pm 2$ , and of the critical wavenumber (c) for $Pe=34\pm 2$ and (d) for $Pe=52\pm 2$ . Open symbols are the experiments, curves are theory. The error bars and the confidence bands refer to one standard deviation. Here, $k_{cN}=\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}$ is the critical wavenumber for a Newtonian fluid initially at rest.

Figure 6(c,d) compares the experimental and theoretical values of the critical wavenumber for varying $n$ , again for two different values of $Pe$ . The trend is correctly reproduced and the theoretical formulation always underpredicts the experimental result to a variable degree (the maximum discrepancy is below 10 %), with a lower average discrepancy for experiments at low Péclet number.

There are several sources of discrepancy: the strong nonlinearity of the flow field favours a rapid evolution of the cell from the onset of instability towards a fully developed cell with a reduction of wavelength (and consequent increment of the experimental wavenumber). A further evolution leads to doubling of the cells. A disturbing factor is a possible slip at the wall, which is not included in the model and which reduces the flow resistance and favours the growth of the instability. This effect was clearly detected for viscoplastic fluids (Darbouli et al. Reference Darbouli, Métivier, Piau, Magnin and Abdelali2013), and is widely documented for most aqueous polymer solutions – see Joshi, Lele & Mashelkar (Reference Joshi, Lele and Mashelkar2000) and Valdez et al. (Reference Valdez, Yeomans, Montes, Acuña and Ayala1995).

5 Discussion and conclusions

The need to extend the available models for Darcy–Bénard instability to rheologically complex fluids and non-viscometric flow fields has suggested the analysis of non-Newtonian fluid flow in a two-dimensional geometry and in the presence of a uniform cross-flow. The fluid is assumed to display a power-law nature with temperature-dependent consistency index. A two-dimensional linear stability analysis in the vertical plane yields the critical wavenumber and the critical Rayleigh number upon solving numerically the eigenvalue problem. The critical Rayleigh and wavenumbers are significantly affected by the power-law index and by the thermal effects on the consistency index, displaying a non-monotonic trend with local minima and maxima.

A set of experiments performed in a Hele-Shaw cell allowed us to study flow patterns as functions of the Rayleigh number. The experiments were carried out with shear-thinning fluids of flow behaviour index $n$ ranging from 0.55 to 0.72, coupled with cell gap widths of 0.2 or 0.3 cm, imposing cross-flow velocities of approximately $0.01~\text{cm}~\text{s}^{-1}$ and vertical temperature gradients of $0.5{-}3.4~\text{K}~\text{cm}^{-1}$ between the lower and upper frames. The critical wavenumber was obtained via analysis of the frames acquired.

The overall flow dynamics is controlled by the entangled interaction between fluid properties, geometry of the flow field and underlying uniform cross-flow. The onset of convective cells occurs with increasing wavenumber for increasing $n$ . At the onset of convection, the shear-thinning behaviour favours a fast growth of the instabilities. Considering the complexity of the protocol and the numerous sources of uncertainty (see Longo et al. (Reference Longo, Di Federico, Chiapponi and Archetti2013b ), for details on uncertainties in rheometric measurements), experimental results show a fairly good agreement, within 10 %, with theory for the critical wavenumber. The discrepancy may be attributed to nonlinear phenomena not captured by the linear stability analysis, and additionally to slip at the wall, and ageing and degradation of the fluid properties – all unaccounted-for phenomena in the theoretical model.

Results for the critical Rayleigh number show a correct trend and an overall acceptable agreement with theoretical predictions; the discrepancy varies widely with $n$ and $Pe$ values, and is generally larger than for the critical wavenumber. The theoretical model itself shows a larger sensitivity to the governing parameters for $Ra_{c}$ than for $k_{c}$ . Other rheological models, more complex than the power law, are available to describe Xanthan Gum mixtures (see, for example, Escudier et al. (Reference Escudier, Gouldson, Pereira, Pinho and Poole2001), where a Carreau–Yasuda model is favourably tested). However, the power-law model is suitable to locally describe complex rheologies, with several validations in complex flows geometries – see Longo et al. (Reference Longo, Di Federico, Archetti, Chiapponi, Ciriello and Ungarish2013a ) and the recent Chiapponi et al. (Reference Chiapponi, Ciriello, Longo and Di Federico2019). In this regard, we have verified that in the shear rate range of our experiments, a power-law model adequately fits the rheometric data – see figure 1(b) and its caption in the supplementary material.

The experiments showed clearly that the development of the instability may occur at a threshold Rayleigh number lower than the critical value predicted by linear stability theory. This could be considered as symptomatic of a subcritical bifurcation, induced by the nonlinear terms in the governing equations of the fluid. Indeed, it is well established, both experimentally and theoretically, that the bifurcation is supercritical in the Darcy–Bénard convection with throughflow for a Newtonian fluid. The supercritical linear threshold of absolute instability (see Barletta Reference Barletta2019) was found to correspond perfectly to the one needed in experiments to trigger the instability. As suggested by the present series of experiments, as well as by the shear-thinning behaviour (see Balmforth & Rust Reference Balmforth and Rust2009; Albaalbaki & Khayat Reference Albaalbaki and Khayat2011; Bouteraa et al. Reference Bouteraa, Nouar, Plaut, Métivier and Kalck2015), the nature of the bifurcation may be subcritical, and therefore a nonlinear stability analysis has to be carried out as a natural development of the present study. By using the concepts of nonlinearly convective and absolute instability, as defined in Couairon & Chomaz (Reference Couairon and Chomaz1997), one can hope to obtain results that corroborate the experimental results obtained in this paper.

The present study can be extended in several directions. In particular, a change of the boundary condition (open instead of closed top) in the experimental set-up could give further hints for understanding the complex evolution of the cells; a direct numerical simulation should be at hand, due to the viscous regime of the flow field. The great flexibility of numerical experiments could shed light on the possible effects of slip at the wall and on the evolution in the quasi-linear and fully nonlinear regimes. Additional topics to be investigated are related to vertical fractures with uneven gaps (for example, see Felisa et al. (Reference Felisa, Lenci, Lauriola, Longo and Di Federico2018)), which are good proxies of geological fractures characterised by a length scale from a few centimetres to several metres and subject to thermal gradients and cross-flow. The vertical convection should be a quite efficient agent for re-mixing the fluid, favouring heat exchange and chemical reactions.

Acknowledgements

S.L. gratefully acknowledges the financial support from A. Paar for co-funding the Anton Paar MCR702 rheometer. The cost of the equipment used for this experimental investigation was partly supported by the University of Parma through the Scientific Instrumentation Upgrade Programme 2018. V.D.F. and A.B. gratefully acknowledge financial support from Università di Bologna Almaidea 2017 Linea Senior Grant.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.84.

References

Albaalbaki, B. & Khayat, R. E. 2011 Pattern selection in the thermal convection of non-Newtonian fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 668, 500550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alloui, Z., Khelifa, N. B., Beji, H. & Vasseur, P. 2012 Onset of convection in a horizontal porous layer saturated by a power-law fluid. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 134 (9), 092502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, L. S. de B. & Barletta, A. 2013 Convective instability of the Darcy–Bénard problem with through flow in a porous layer saturated by a power-law fluid. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 62, 495506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmforth, N. J. & Rust, A. C. 2009 Weakly nonlinear viscoplastic convection. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 158 (1–3), 3645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barletta, A. 2019 Routes to Absolute Instability in Porous Media. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barletta, A. & Nield, D. A. 2011 Linear instability of the horizontal throughflow in a plane porous layer saturated by a power-law fluid. Phys. Fluids 23, 013102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barletta, A. & Storesletten, L. 2016 Linear instability of the vertical throughflow in a horizontal porous layer saturated by a power-law fluid. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 99, 293302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouteraa, M., Nouar, C., Plaut, E., Métivier, C. & Kalck, A. 2015 Weakly nonlinear analysis of Rayleigh–Bénard convection in shear-thinning fluids: nature of the bifurcation and pattern selection. J. Fluid Mech. 767, 696734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celli, M., Barletta, A., Longo, S., Chiapponi, L., Ciriello, V., Di Federico, V. & Valiani, A. 2017 Thermal instability of a power-law fluid flowing in a horizontal porous layer with an open boundary: a two-dimensional analysis. Trans. Porous Med. 118 (3), 449471.Google Scholar
Cherkaoui, A. S. M. & Wilcock, W. S. D. 2001 Laboratory studies of high Rayleigh number circulation in an open-top Hele-Shaw cell: an analog to mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal systems. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 1098311000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiapponi, L., Ciriello, V., Longo, S. & Di Federico, V. 2019 Non-Newtonian backflow in an elastic fracture. Water Resour. Res. 55 (12), 1014410158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciriello, V., Longo, S., Chiapponi, L. & Di Federico, V. 2016 Porous gravity currents: a survey to determine the joint influence of fluid rheology and variations of medium properties. Adv. Water Resour. 92, 105115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couairon, A. & Chomaz, J.-M. 1997 Absolute and convective instabilities, front velocities and global modes in nonlinear systems. Physica D 108 (3), 236276.Google Scholar
Darbouli, M., Métivier, C., Leclerc, S., Nouar, C., Bouteera, M. & Stemmelen, D. 2016 Natural convection in shear-thinning fluids: experimental investigations by MRI. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 95, 742754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darbouli, M., Métivier, C., Piau, J.-M., Magnin, A. & Abdelali, A. 2013 Rayleigh–Bénard convection for viscoplastic fluids. Phys. Fluids 25, 023101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudier, M. P., Gouldson, I. W., Pereira, A. S., Pinho, F. T. & Poole, R. J. 2001 On the reproducibility of the rheology of shear-thinning liquids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 97 (2–3), 99124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felisa, G., Lenci, A., Lauriola, I., Longo, S. & Di Federico, V. 2018 Flow of truncated power-law fluid in fracture channels of variable aperture. Adv. Water Resour. 122, 317327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartline, B. K. & Lister, C. R. B. 1977 Thermal convection in a Hele-Shaw cell. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 379389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, S. C., Alves, L. S. de B., Delenda, N. & Ouarzazi, M. N. 2015 Convective and absolute instabilities in Rayleigh–Bénard–Poiseuille mixed convection for viscoelastic fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 765, 167210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, S. C. & Ouarzazi, M. N. 2010 Three-dimensional absolute and convective instabilities in mixed convection of a viscoelastic fluid through a porous medium. Phys. Lett. A 374, 26612666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, C. W. & Rogers, F. T. 1945 Convection currents in a porous medium. J. Appl. Phys. 16, 367370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, Y. M., Lele, A. K. & Mashelkar, R. A. 2000 Slipping fluids: a unified transient network model. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 89 (3), 303335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebiche, Z., Castelain, C. & Burghelea, T. 2014 Experimental investigation of the Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a yield stress fluid. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 203, 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, D. J. & Goldstein, R. J. 2015 Thermal convection in porous media at high Rayleigh numbers. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 137, 034503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, J. N. & Müller, U. 1982 Free convection in vertical gaps. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 429451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapwood, E. R. 1948 Convection of a fluid in a porous medium. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 44, 508521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letelier, J. A., Herrera, P., Mujica, N. & Ortega, J. H. 2016 Enhancement of synthetic schlieren image resolution using total variation optical flow: application to thermal experiments in a Hele-Shaw cell. Exp. Fluids 57, 114.Google Scholar
Lister, C. R. B. 1990 An explanation for the multivalued heat transport found experimentally for convection in a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 214, 287320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longo, S., Di Federico, V., Archetti, R., Chiapponi, L., Ciriello, V. & Ungarish, M. 2013a On the axisymmetric spreading of non-Newtonian power-law gravity currents of time-dependent volume: an experimental and theoretical investigation focused on the inference of rheological parameters. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 201, 6979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longo, S., Di Federico, V. & Chiapponi, L. 2015 A dipole solution for power-law gravity currents in porous formations. J. Fluid Mech. 778, 534551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longo, S., Di Federico, V., Chiapponi, L. & Archetti, R. 2013b Experimental verification of power-law non-Newtonian axisymmetric porous gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 731, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Métivier, C., Li, C. & Magnin, A. 2017 Origin of the onset of Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a concentrated suspension of microgels with a yield stress behavior. Phys. Fluids 29 (10), 104102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Métivier, C. & Magnin, A. 2011 The effect of wall slip on the stability of the Rayleigh–Bénard Poiseuille flow of viscoplastic fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 166 (14), 839846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nield, D. A. 1968 Onset of thermohaline convection in a porous medium. Water Resour. Res. 11, 553560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nield, D. A. 2011a A further note on the onset of convection in a layer of a porous medium saturated by a non-Newtonian fluid of power-law type. Trans. Porous Med. 88, 187191.Google Scholar
Nield, D. A. 2011b A note on the onset of convection in a layer of a porous medium saturated by a non-Newtonian nanofluid of power-law type. Trans. Porous Med. 87, 121123.Google Scholar
Nield, D. A. & Bejan, A. 2013 Convection in Porous Media, 4th edn. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Z., Gryglaszewski, P. & Stacharska-Targosz, J. 1982 Laminar heat transfer to power law fluids in flat gaps with various thermal wall conditions. Acta Mechanica 44, 223236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prats, M. 1966 The effect of horizontal fluid flow on thermally induced convection currents in porous mediums. J. Geophys. Res. 71, 48354838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, D. A. S. 2000 The stability of Darcy–Bénard convection. In Handbook of Porous Media (ed. Vafai, K. & Hadim, H. A.), chap. 12, pp. 521558. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Rees, D. A. S. 2015 Convection of a Bingham fluid in a porous medium. In Handbook of Porous Media, 3rd edn. (ed. Vafai, K.), chap. 17, pp. 559595. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. J. & Milverton, S. W. 1935 On the instability of a fluid when heated from below. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 152 (877), 586594.Google Scholar
Shattuck, M. D., Behringer, R. P., Johnson, G. A. & Georgiadis, J. G. 1995 Onset and stability of convection in porous media: visualization by magnetic resonance imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (10), 1934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdez, M. A., Yeomans, L., Montes, F., Acuña, H. & Ayala, A. 1995 Influence of temperature on the slip velocity of semidilute Xanthan Gum solutions. Rheol. Acta 34 (5), 474482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Sketch of the simulated domain.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Critical values of the Rayleigh number.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Critical values of the wavenumber.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Layout of the Hele-Shaw cell.

Figure 4

Table 1. Parameters of the experiments. Here, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{0}$ is the reference mass density at a temperature of 298 K, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{0}^{\ast }$ is the fluid consistency index, evaluated at the reference temperature $T_{0}$, $n$ is the fluid behaviour index, $b$ is the gap width, $\overline{u}_{b}$ is the average basic horizontal velocity, $T_{0.5}$ is the temperature in the mid section $z/H=0.5$ during experiments (minimum/maximum value), $Pe$ is the Péclet number, $Ra_{c,exp}$ is the experimental critical Rayleigh number, $k_{c,exp}$ is the dimensionless critical wavenumber. Expt., experiment.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Evolution of the perturbation over time (top to bottom and left to right) for one of the experiments. The vertical lines delimit squares with side length equal to$H=4~\text{cm}$. In the final frame (bottom right) a bifurcation of the cell in a strongly nonlinear regime is observed. Snapshots are 60 s apart.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Comparison of the experimental and theoretical values of the critical Rayleigh number (a) for $Pe=34\pm 2$ and (b) for $Pe=52\pm 2$, and of the critical wavenumber (c) for $Pe=34\pm 2$ and (d) for $Pe=52\pm 2$. Open symbols are the experiments, curves are theory. The error bars and the confidence bands refer to one standard deviation. Here, $k_{cN}=\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}$ is the critical wavenumber for a Newtonian fluid initially at rest.

Supplementary material: File

Petrolo et al. supplementary material

Petrolo et al. supplementary material

Download Petrolo et al. supplementary material(File)
File 441.5 KB