Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:05:47.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation on the arc erosion behavior of new silver matrix composites: Part II. Reinforced by short fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2012

Chia-Jung Hsu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Shou-Yi Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Liang-Yu Chou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Su-Jien Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

An electroless plating and hot-pressing process was developed to fabricate silver matrix composites reinforced with uniformly distributed graphite and Saffil short fibers (Graphitesf and Saffilsf). The hardness of the composites increases as the content of short fibers increase. Static-gap, single-spark erosion and repeated-collision, multiple-arc erosion tests were used to investigate the arc erosion behavior of the composites. The composites exhibited better arc erosion resistance when the contents of short fibers were increased in a static-gap, single-spark erosion test. However, the weight loss of the composites after 10,000 times repeated-collision, multiple-arc erosion operation shows that the composites with low volume percents of short fibers have a good arc erosion resistance. The Saffilsf/Ag composites show a better arc erosion resistance than Graphitesf/Ag because of the greater strengthening effect of the finer Saffil short fibers. The erosion behavior of the composites is dominated by the viscosity of composites in single-spark tests, while it depends on the competition of viscosity and thermal properties in multiple-arc tests.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Sawa, K. and Hasegawa, M., IEICE Trans. Electron. E83–C, 1363 (2000).Google Scholar
Nadkarni, A.V., Synk, J.E., Gilman, P.S., and Benjamin, J.S., in Metals Handbook, 9th ed., edited by Mills, K., Davis, J.R., Refsnes, S.K., and Sanders, B.R. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1984), Vol. 7, pp. 710727.Google Scholar
Shen, Y.S., Lattari, P., Gardner, J., and Weigard, H., in Metals Handbook, 10th ed., edited by Lampman, S.R. and Zorc, T.B. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1990), Vol. 2, pp. 840868.Google Scholar
Michal, R. and Saeger, K.E., IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids Manufact. Technol. 12, 71 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, M. and Kubono, T., IEICE Trans. Electron. E83–C, 1377 (2000).Google Scholar
Chen, Z.K., Hayakawa, T., and Sawa, K., IEICE Trans. Electron. E81–C, 435 (1998).Google Scholar
Wang, B.J. and Saka, N., Wear 195, 133 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyer, N.S., in Metals Handbook, 9th ed., edited by Mills, K., Davis, J.R., Refsnes, S.K., and Sanders, B.R. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1984), Vol. 7, pp. 630634.Google Scholar
Coxe, C.D., McDonald, A.S., Sistare, G.H., in Metals Handbook, 10th ed., edited by Lampman, S.R. and Zorc, T.B. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1990), Vol. 2, pp. 699704.Google Scholar
Bevinton, R.C. and Kim, H.J., IEEE Trans. Comp., Packag., Manufact. Technol. A 2, 46 (1979).Google Scholar
Schroder, K.H., IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids Manufact. Technol. 10, 127 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.Y., Lin, J.H., Lin, S.J., and Kattamis, T.Z., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30A, 1119 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.Y., Hsu, C.H., and Lin, S.J., J. Mater. Res. 18, 804 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B.J., Saka, N., and Rabinowicz, E., IEEE Trans. Comp., Hybrids, Manufact. Technol. 14, 374 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B.J., Saka, N., and Rabinowicz, E., Wear 157, 31 (1992).Google Scholar
Chen, Z.K. and Sawa, K., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3326 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinger, J. and Mc, J.W.Bride, IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids Manufact. Technol. 19, 404 (1996).Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, E., in Friction and Wear of Materials (Wiley, New York, NY, 1965), pp. 198203.Google Scholar
Behrens, E., J. Composite Mater. 2, 2 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamis, C.C., NASA Tech. Memo. 83320 (1983).Google Scholar
Halpin, J.C. and Tsai, S.W., in Effects of Enviromental Factors on Composite Materials Design, AFML-TR 67-423 (Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawla, K.K., in Composite Materials Science and Engineering (Spriger-Verlag, New York, 1987), pp. 177191.Google Scholar
Greenhut, V.A., in Metals Handbook, 10th ed., edited by Lampman, S.R. and Zorc, T.B. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1997), Vol. 20, p. 428.Google Scholar
ASM Committee on Definitions of Metallurgical Terms, in Metals Handbook, 10th ed., Desk Edition, edited by Boyer, H.E. and Gall, T.L. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1985), pp. 1·46–1·47.Google Scholar
Holliday, L., in Composite Materials, edited by Holliday, L. (Elsevier, New York, 1966), p. 36.Google Scholar