Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:48:14.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biostratigraphy of crinoids from the Wymps Gap member of the Greenbrier Formation (Mississippian, Chesterian) in northern West Virginia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Thomas W. Kammer  and
Gregory S. Springer
Thomas W. Kammer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-6300,
Gregory S. Springer
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens 45701,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Crowns of four crinoid species, Talarocrinus planus Weller, 1920, Phacelocrinus longidactylus (McChesney, 1860), Ampelocrinus mundus? Kirk, 1942, and Phanocrinus maniformis (Yandell and Shumard, 1847) are reported from the limestones of the Wymps Gap Member of the Greenbrier Formation in northern West Virginia. Collectively these species indicate an early Chesterian age for the Wymps Gap Member, with the occurrence of T. planus indicating correlation with the Ridenhower (Paint Creek) Formation of the Illinois Basin. A review of the 17 species currently placed in Talarocrinus suggests that the Talarocrinus zone ranges no higher than the Ridenhower Formation in the Upper Gnathodus bilineatus conodont zone of the late Visean. The new occurrence of A. mundus extends its range upwards from the Genevievian substage of the Chesterian.

Previous studies have used sequence stratigraphy to correlate the Wymps Gap Member with the lower part of the Union Limestone Formation of the Greenbrier Group in southern West Virginia, which in turn has been correlated with the Ridenhower Formation. The occurrence of T. planus in the Wymps Gap Member provides independent confirmation of the correlations based on sequence stratigraphy between the Appalachian and Illinois basins. Correlation of the overlying Reynolds Member of the Mauch Chunk Formation with the Glen Dean Formation of the Illinois Basin suggests a significant unconformity between the Greenbrier Formation and Mauch Chunk Formation in northern West Virginia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 6 , November 2008 , pp. 1182 - 1189
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Tawil, A., Wynn, T. C., and Read, J. F. 2003. Sequence response of a distal-to-proximal foreland ramp to glacio-eustasy and tectonics: Mississippian, Appalachian Basin, West Virginia-Virginia, U.S.A. SEPM Special Publication No. 78 and AAPG Memoir 83, p. 11–34.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper 45, 734 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1890. British fossil crinoids. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 6, 5:310–334.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1899. A phylogenetic classification of the Pelmatozoa. British Association of the Advancement of Science Report, 1898:916–923.Google Scholar
Brezinski, D. K. 1989. The Mississippian System in Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey, Report of Investigations No. 52, 75 p.Google Scholar
Burdick, D. W. and Strimple, H. L. 1983. Genevievian and Chesterian crinoids of Alabama. Geological Survey of Alabama Bulletin (1982) 121, 277 p.Google Scholar
Carney, C. K. 1987. Petrology and diagenesis of the Upper Mississippian Greenbrier Limestone in the central Appalachian Basin and of the Lower Carboniferous Great Limestone in northern England. Ph.D. dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 399 p.Google Scholar
Carter, J. L. and Carter, R. C. 1970. Bibliography and Index of North American Carboniferous Brachiopods. Geological Society of America Memoir 128, 382 p.Google Scholar
Casseday, S. A. and Lyon, S. S. 1862. Description of two new genera and eight new species of fossil Crinoidea from the rocks of Indiana and Kentucky. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 5:16–31.Google Scholar
Chesnut, D. R. Jr. and Ettensohn, F. R. 1988. Hombergian (Chesterian) echinoderm paleontology and paleoecology, south-central Kentucky. Bulletins of American Paleontology 95, 102 p.Google Scholar
Collinson, C., Rexroad, C. B., and Thompson, T. L. 1971. Conodont zonation of the North American Mississippian. Geological Society of America Memoir 127,p. 353–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Report of the Geological Survey of the State of Iowa embracing the results of investigations made during portions of the years 1855, 1856, 1857. Volume 1, Part 1: Geology; Part 2: Palaeontology; 724 p.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. S. 1965. Crinoids from the Glen Dean Limestone (Middle Chester) of southern Indiana and Kentucky. Indiana Geological Survey, Bulletin, 34:1–52.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. S. and Rexroad, C. B. 1972. Conodont biostratigraphy of some United States Mississippian sites. Journal of Paleontology, 46:884–891.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. S. and Strimple, H. L. 1974. Chesterian echinoderm zonation in eastern United States. 7th Congres International de Stratigraphie et de Geologie du Carbonifere, Krefeld, 1971, Compte Rendu, 3:207–217.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Lake, A. M. 2001. Salinity ranges of Late Mississippian invertebrates of the central Appalachian Basin. Southeastern Geology, 40:99–116.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. R. 1894. Paleontology of Missouri, pt. I, Missouri Geological Survey, 4:143–225.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1929. Cryphiocrinus, a new genus of free-swimming crinoids. American Journal of Science, 17:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, E. 1937. Eupachycrinus and related Carboniferous crinoid genera. Journal of Paleontology, 11:598–607.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1940. Seven new genera of Carboniferous Crinoidea Inadunata. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 30:321–334.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1942. Ampelocrinus, a new crinoid genus from the Upper Mississippian. American Journal of Science, 240:22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, W. D. 1969. Declinida, a new order of late Paleozoic inadunate crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 43:340–391.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. and Brenckle, P. L. 2005. Type Mississippian subdivisions and biostratigraphic succession, p. 83–107. In Heckel, P. H. (ed.), Stratigraphy and Biostratigraphy of the Mississippian Subsystem (Carboniferous System) in Its Type Region, the Mississippi River Valley of Illinois, Missouri and Iowa. I.U.G.S. Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Guidebook for Field Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, September 8–13, 2001: Illinois State Geological Survey Guidebook 34.Google Scholar
Maynard, J. P., Eriksson, K. A., and Law, R. D. 2006. The Upper Mississippian Bluefield Formation in the central Appalachian Basin: A hierarchical sequence-stratigraphic record of a greenhouse to icehouse transition. Sedimentary Geology, 192:99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McChesney, J. H. 1860. Descriptions of new fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the western states. Transactions of the Chicago Academy of Science, Ext. 2, p. 77–95.Google Scholar
McChesney, J. H. 1868. Descriptions of fossils from the Palaeozoic rocks of the western states, with illustrations. Transactions of the Chicago Academy of Science, 1:1–57.Google Scholar
McIntosh, G. C. 2001. Devonian cladid crinoids: Families Glossocrinidae Goldring, 1923, and Rutkowskicrinidae new family. Journal of Paleontology, 75:783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1860. Descriptions of new species of crinoidea and echinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of Illinois, and other western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 12:379–397.Google Scholar
Miller, D. J. and Eriksson, K. A. 2000. Sequence stratigraphy of Upper Mississippian strata in the central Appalachians: A record of glacioeustasy and tectonoeustasy in a foreland basin setting. AAPG Bulletin, 84:210–233.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lily-shaped Animals, With Observations on the Genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites. Bryan, Bristol, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1879. Remarks upon the Kaskaskia group, and descriptions of new species of fossils from Pulaski County, Kentucky. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 2:31–42.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American geology and paleontology. Cincinnati, Western Methodist Book Concern, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miler, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1893. Description of some new species of invertebrates from the Palaeozoic rocks of Illinois and adjacent states. Illinois State Museum, Bulletin, 3:1–81.Google Scholar
Miler, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1894. New genera and species of Echinodermata. Illinois State Museum, Bulletin, 5:1–53.Google Scholar
Miler, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1897. New species of crinoids, cephalopods, and other Palaeozoic fossils. Illinois State Museum, Bulletin, 12:1–69.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., Lane, N. G., and Strimple, H. L. 1978. Order Cladida, p. T578–T755. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Laudon, L. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper 46, 153 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.). 1978. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 1027 p.Google Scholar
Peters, J. and Lane, N. G. 1990. Ontogenetic adaptations in some Pennsylvanian crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 64:427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. H. 1929. Pocahontas County Report. West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, County Report, 866 p.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. and Clarke, C. E. 1960. Conodonts from the Glen Dean Formation of Kentucky and equivalent formations of Virginia and West Virginia. Journal of Paleontology, 34:1202–1206.Google Scholar
Rollins, H. B. and Brezinski, D. K. 1988. Reinterpretation of crinoidplatyceratid interaction. Lethaia, 21:207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, R. H., Ault, C. H., Burger, A. M., Carr, D. D., Droste, J. B., Eggert, D. L., Gray, H. H., Harper, D., Hassenmueller, N. R., Hassenmueller, W. A., Horowitz, A. S., Hutchinson, H. C., Keith, B. D., Keller, S. J., Patton, J. B., Rexroad, C. B., and Wier, C. E. 1986. Compendium of Paleozoic rock-unit stratigraphy in Indiana - a revision. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey Bulletin 59, 203 p.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1857. Description of new fossil Crinoidea from the Palaeozoic rocks of the western and southern portions of the United States. Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Science (1857), 1:71–80.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1867. A catalogue of the Palaeozoic fossils of North America: Pt. I. Paleozoic Echinodermata. Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Science (1866), 2:334–407.Google Scholar
Smith, L. B., Al-Tawil, A., and Read, J. F. 2001. High-resolution sequence stratigraphic setting of Mississippian eolianites, Appalachian and Illinois basins. SEPM Special Publication 71:167–181.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1973. Notes on Mississippian Ampelocriniade. In Fossil Crinoid Studies, University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 66, no. 5, p. 21–24.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. and Horowitz, A. S. 1971. A new Mississippian ampelocrinid. In Fossil Crinoid Studies, University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 56, no. 5, p. 23–27, figs. 9, 10.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. and Moore, R. C. 1973. Notes on the inadunate crinoid genus Phanocrinus, Part I. In Fossil Crinoid Studies, University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 66, no. 1, p. 2–7.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. H. and Winkler, V. D. 1940. Mississippian Inadunata—Eupachycrinus and related forms. Journal of Paleontology, 14:544–567.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978a. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58–T216. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. T. Echinodermata 2(1). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978b. Camerata, p. T408—T519. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1917. The formations of the Chester Series in Western Kentucky and their correlates elsewhere. Kentucky Geological Survey, p. 1–236.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1881. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. 2. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1881:175–411 (1–237).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1885. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. 3, Sec. 1. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1885:223–364 (1–139).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology, Memoir 21–22, 897 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G. D. 2003. Bibliography and Index of Paleozoic Crinoids, Coronates, and Hemistreptocrinids 1758–1999. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 363. http://crinoid.gsajournals.org/crinoidmodGoogle Scholar
Weller, J. M., Williams, J. S., Bell, W. A., Dunbar, C. O., Laudon, L. R., Moore, R. C., Stockdale, P. B., Warren, P. S., Caster, K. E., Cooper, C. L., Willard, B., Croneis, C., Malott, C. A., Price, P. H., and Sutton, A. H. 1948. Correlation of the Mississippian formations of North America. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 59:91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S. 1920. The Geology of Hardin County. Chapter 13, Paleontology. Illinois Geological Survey Bulletin, 41:313–377.Google Scholar
Wells, D. 1950. Lower middle Mississippian of southeastern West Virginia. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 34:882–922.Google Scholar
Wood, E. 1909. A critical summary of Troost's unpublished manuscript on the crinoids of Tennessee. U.S. National Museum, Bulletin, 64:1–150.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1866. Geology. Geological Survey of Illinois, 1:504 p.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1873. In Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. (eds.), Palaeontology of Illinois. Description of invertebrates from Carboniferous System. In Geology and Palaeontology. Illinois Geological Survey, 5:323–619.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1875. In Worthen, A. H. and Meek, F. B. (eds.), Palaeontology of Illinois. Section II. Description of invertebrates. In Geology and Palaeontology. Illinois Geological Survey, 6:489–532.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1882. Descriptions of fifty-four new species of crinoids from the Lower Carboniferous limestones and Coal Measures of Illinois and Iowa. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 1:3–38.Google Scholar
Yandell, L. P. and Shumard, B. F. 1847. Contributions to the geology of Kentucky. Prentice and Weissinger, Louisville, Kentucky, 36 p.Google Scholar