Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:01:35.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conulariids of the Upper Talak Formation (Mississippian, Visean) of northern Niger (West Africa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Heyo Van Iten
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, Hanover College, Hanover, Indiana 47243,
Moussa Konate
Affiliation:
2Department of Geology, Abdou Moumouni University, B.P. 10662, Niamey, Niger,
Yahaya Moussa
Affiliation:
2Department of Geology, Abdou Moumouni University, B.P. 10662, Niamey, Niger,

Extract

Conulariids of West Africa have received relatively little detailed attention in the literature on this widespread extinct group of marine cnidarians. Recently, however, Babcock et al. (1995) described two new species, Paraconularia feldmanni and P. sahara, from the upper part of the Mississippian (Visean) Talak Shale Formation in the Tim Mersoi Basin of northern Niger. This was the first report of the genus Paraconularia Sinclair, 1940 from Africa as well as the first assignment of Carboniferous conulariids from that continent to the species level. Since then two of the present authors have collected 24 additional conulariid specimens from the Talak Formation in the same area that yielded the two specimens described by Babcock et al. (1995). Like the previously described material, most of the new specimens, described below, have been worn or weathered to such an extent that it is difficult to identify them to the species level. In some cases, moreover, identification to the genus level is problematical, but this may ultimately be due to the fact that currently recognized conulariid genera (e.g., Moore and Harrington, 1956b) have been defined phenetically, rather than on the basis of prior analysis of the phylogenetic relationships among conulariid species. This means that at least some currently recognized conulariid genera may have been defined by similarities that are primitive or analogous.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, L. E. and Feldmann, R. M. 1986a. Devonian and Mississippian conulariids of North America, Pt. A, General description and Conularia. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 55(15):349410.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E. and Feldmann, R. M. 1986b. Devonian and Mississippian conulariids of North America, Pt. B, Paraconularia, Reticulaconularia, new genus, and organisms rejected from Conulariida. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 55(16):411479.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Feldmann, R. M., Wilson, M. T., and Suárez-Riglos, M. 1987. Devonian conulariids of Bolivia. National Geographic Research, 3(2):210231.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Lang, J., and Yahaya, M. 1995. First Carboniferous conulariids from Niger (West Africa). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 20(1): 16.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1867. Système Silurien du centre de la Bohême. Iière Partie. Tome 3. Class des mollusques, ordre des ptéropodes. Charles Bellmann, Prague.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. 1928. Revise Českych Paleozoických konularii. Palaeontographica Bohemiae, 11:60108.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. M. and Werner, B. 1972. Structure of a solitary and a colonial species of Stephanoscyphus (Scyphozoa, Coronatae) with observations on periderm repair. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 23: 393421.Google Scholar
Götte, A. 1887. Entwicklungsgeschichte der Aurelia aurita und Cotylorhiza tuberculata. Abhandlungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Tiere. Viertes Heft. Verlag von Leoplod Voss. Hamburg und Leipzig, 79 p.Google Scholar
Hatschek, B. 1888. Lehrbuch der Zoologie. Eine morphologische Übersicht der Thierreiches zur Einführung in das Stadium dieser Wissenschaft. Erste Liefrung. Fischer, Jena, 304 p.Google Scholar
Hergarten, B. 1985. Die Conularien des Rheinischen Devons. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 66(3/5):269297.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H. 1940. The invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora. Volume 1. McGraw-Hill, New York, 478 p.Google Scholar
Kowalski, J. 1935. Les Conulaires. Quelques observations sur leur structure anatomique. Société des sciences naturèlles de l'Ouest France, Bulletin Série 5, 5:281293.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1865. Contributions to the paleontology of Illinois and other western states. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Proceedings for 1865, pp. 245273.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Harrington, H. J. 1956a. Scyphozoa, p. F27F38. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. F, Coelenterata. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Harrington, H. J. 1956b. Conulata, p. F54F66. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. F, Coelenterata. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1933. Some new Ordovician species of Conularia from Girvan. Geological Magazine, 70:354358.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. 1997. Paleogeographic Atlas. PALEOMAP Progress Report 90-0497, PALEOMAP Project and University of Texas, Arlington.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1940. The genotype of Conularia. Canadian Field Naturalist, 54:7274.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1942. The Chazy Conularida and their congeners. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 29(10):219240.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1946. Three new conulariids from the Ordovician of Quebec. Le Naturaliste Canadien, 73:385390.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1948. The Biology of the Conulariida. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, 442 p.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1952. A classification of the Conulariida. Fieldiana Geology, 10:135145.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1821. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of those Remains of Testaceous Animals or Shells, which have been Preserved at Various Times, and Depths in the Earth, Vol. 3. Pt. 46. W. Harding, London, p. 107118.Google Scholar
Swallow, G. C. 1860. Descriptions of new fossils from the Carboniferous and Devonian rocks of Missouri. Academy of Sciences of Saint Louis, Transactions, 1:635660.Google Scholar
Valsardieu, C. 1974. Étude géologique et paléogéographique du bassin de Tim Mersoï-région d'Agadès (République du Niger). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Nice, France, 518 pp.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H. 1992a. Morphology and phylogenetic significance of the corners and midlines of the conulariid test. Palaeontology, 35:335358.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H. 1992b. Microstructure and growth of the conulariid test: implications for conulariid affinities. Palaeontology, 35:359372.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H., Fitzke, J. A., and Cox, R. S. 1996. Problematical fossil cnidarians from the Upper Ordovician of the north-central USA. Palaeontology, 39:10371064.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H. and Vhylasova, Z. 2004. Conulariids, p. 119123. In Webby, B., Droser, M. L., and Paris, F. (eds.), The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H., Leme, J. M., Simões, M. G., Marques, A. C., and Collins, A. G. 2006. Reassessment of the phylogenetic position of conulariids (?Ediacara-Triassic) within the subphylum Medusozoa (Phylum Cnidaria). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 4(2): 109118.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1879. Descriptions of new species of fossils from the Trenton limestone. New York State Museum of Natural History, 28th Annual Report, 9397.Google Scholar
Whiteaves, J. F. 1891. The fossils of the Devonian rocks of the Mackenzie River Basin. Geological and Natural History Survey of Canada, Contributions to Canadian Palaeontology, 1:197253.Google Scholar
Yahaya, M. 1992. Dynamique sédimentaire du Guézouman et des formations viséennes sous-jacentes en liaison avec la tectonique, le volcanisme et le climat. Paléomilieux des gîtes uranifères d'Arlit (Niger). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Bourgogne, France, 355 p.Google Scholar