Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:50:47.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geralinura carbonaria (Arachnida; Uropygi) from Mazon Creek, Illinois, USA, and the origin of subchelate pedipalps in whip scorpions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

O. Erik Tetlie  and
Jason A. Dunlop
O. Erik Tetlie
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, USA,
Jason A. Dunlop
Affiliation:
2Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt Universitát zu Berlin, Invalidenstr. 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The whip scorpions (Arachnida: Uropygi) from the Pennsylvanian Coal Measures of Mazon Creek, Illinois, USA are restudied. Four Mazon Creek uropygid specimens have previously been described and a fifth is added here. Contrary to earlier reports, none of the specimens lack eyes and the sternum is similarly shaped in all the specimens. Consequently, the two younger names, Geralinura similis Petrunkevitch, 1913 and G. gigantea Petrunkevitch, 1913 are here treated as junior synonyms of G. carbonaria Scudder, 1884. The morphology of the pedipalps is more like those of some modern amblypygids, being spiniferous and non-chelate, suggesting the subchelate palps found in all Recent whip scorpions is an apomorphy not yet incorporated into the bodyplan of G. carbonaria. Indeed, subchelate palps also seem to be absent in other species of this age. For completeness, we summarise here the six Pennsylvanian whip scorpions currently recognised—including sketch reconstructions—with comments on further differences between the Paleozoic and living taxa. Geralinura Scudder, 1884 is reserved for G. carbonaria and the British species G. britannica Pocock, 1911. Prothelyphonus Friĉ, 1904 is reinstated for the Czech species P. bohemicus (Kuŝta, 1884). Parageralinura gen. nov. is proposed for the widely overlooked Dutch species P. neerlandica (Laurentiaux-Vieria and Laurentiaux, 1961) and the German species P. naufraga (Brauckmann and Koch, 1983). All the Coal Measures whip scorpion genera are treated here as plesion taxa, basal to the Thelyphonidae, which can be defined as whip scorpions with a fully subchelate pedipalp, the chelae formed from large and distinct patellar and tibial apophyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , March 2008 , pp. 299 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, G. C., Sroka, S. D., Shabica, C. W., and Kuecher, G. J. 1986. Taphonomy of Middle Pennsylvanian Mazon Creek area fossil localities, northeast Illinois: Significance of exceptional fossil preservation in syngeGnetic concretions. Palaios, 1(3):271–285.Google Scholar
Beall, B. S. 1997. Arachnida, p. 140–154. In Shabica, W. and Hay, A. A. (eds.), Richardsons' Guide to the Fossil Fauna of Mazon Creek. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago.Google Scholar
Berner, R. A. 1971. Principles of Chemical Sedimentology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 240 p.Google Scholar
Brauckmann, C. 1991. Arachniden und Insekten aus dem Namurium von Hagen Vorhalle. Veröffentlichungen aus dem Fuhlrott-Museum, 1:1–273.Google Scholar
Brauckmann, C. and Gröning, E. 2001. Rekonstruktionen der ältesten fossilen Geisseiskorpion- und Kapuzenspinnen-Arten aus dem tiefen Ober-Karbon von Hagen-Vorhalle. Arthropoda, 9(3):9–13.Google Scholar
Brauckmann, C. and Koch, L. 1983. Prothelyphonus naufragus n. sp., ein neuer Geißelskorpion (Arachnida: Thelyphonida: Thelyphonidae) aus dem Namurium (unteres Ober-Karbon) von West-Deutschland. Entomologia Generalis, 9:63–73.Google Scholar
Brauckmann, C., Koch, L., and Kemper, M. 1985. Spinnentiere (Arachnida) und Insekten aus den Vorhalle-Schichten (Namurium B; Ober-Karbon) von Hagen-Vorhalle (West-Deutschland). Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen, 3:1–131.Google Scholar
Brauckmann, C., Schöllmann, L., and Sippel, W. 2003. Die fossilen Insekten, Spinnentiere und Eurypteriden von Hagen-Vorhalle. Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen, 59:1–95.Google Scholar
Dubinin, V. B. 1962. Cheliceromorpha, p. 375–530. In Rodendorf, B. B. (ed.), Fundamentals of Palaeontology. Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. 1998. A fossil whip-scorpion from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. The Journal of Arachnology, 26:291–295.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. and Horrocks, C. A. 1996. A new Upper Carboniferous whip scorpion (Arachnida: Uropygi: Thelyphonida) with a revision of the British Carboniferous Uropygi. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 234:293–306.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. and Martill, D. M. 2002. The first whipspider (Arachnida: Amblypygi) and three new whipscorpions (Arachnida: Thelyphonida) from the Lower Creaceous Crato Formation of Brazil. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 92:325–334.Google Scholar
Frič, A. 1903. Bericht über die mit Unterstützung der kaiserlichen Akademie unternommene Reise behufs Studiums fossiler Arachniden. Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaft, Wien, 112:861–869.Google Scholar
Frič, A. 1904. Palaeozoische Arachniden. Eduard Grégr, Prague.Google Scholar
Haase, E. 1890. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der fossilen Arachniden. Zeitschrift der Deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 42:629–657.Google Scholar
Harvey, M. S. 2003. Catalogue of the Smaller Arachnid Orders of the World. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.Google Scholar
Haupt, J. 2000. Biologie der Geißelskorpiones (Uropygi Thelyphonida). Memorie della Società Entomologica Italiana, 78:305–319.Google Scholar
Heide, S. van der 1951. Les arthropodes du terrain houiller du Limbourg méridional (excepté les scorpions et les insectes). Mededeelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Serie C-IV-3, 5:1–84.Google Scholar
Koch, L. 1984. Aus Devon, Karbon und Kreide: Die fossile Welt des nordwestlichen Sauerlandes. Linnepe Verlagsgesellschaft, Hagen.Google Scholar
Kušta, J. 1884. Thelyphonus bohemicus n. sp., ein fossiler Geißelskorpion aus der Steinkohlenformation von Rakonitz. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich-Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 1884:186–191.Google Scholar
Kušta, J. 1888. Neue Arachniden aus der Steinkohlenformation von Rakonitz. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich-Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 1888:194–208.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802. Histoire naturelle, generale et particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes, Volume 3. Dufart, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1804. Histoire naturelle, generale et particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes, Volume 7. Dufart, Paris.Google Scholar
Laurentiaux-Vieira, F. and Laurentiaux, D. 1961. Prothelyphonus neerlandicus, nov. sp., Uropyge du Westphalien du Limbourg Hollandais. Mededeelingen van de Geologische Stichting, N.S. 13:29–34.Google Scholar
Laurentiaux-Vieira, F. and Laurentiaux, D. 1963. Sur quelques restes nouveaux d'Arachnides du terrain houiller. Annales de la Société Geologique du Nord, 83:23–29.Google Scholar
Lucas, H. 1835. Sur une monographie du genre Thélyphone. Magasin de Zoologie 5: Classe VIII, plates 8-10.Google Scholar
Millot, J. 1949. Ordre des Uropyges, p. 533–562. In Grassé, P.-P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie. Volume 6. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. I. 1913. A monograph of the terrestrial Palaeozoic Arachnida of North America. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 18:1–137.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. I. 1949. A study of Palaeozoic Arachnida. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 37:69–315.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. I. 1953. Paleozoic and Mesozoic Arachnida of Europe. Memoirs of the Geological Society of America, 53:1–128.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. I. 1955. Arachnida, p. 42–162. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. P, Arthropoda 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D. 1945. A fossil whiptail scorpion from Cabrillo Beach. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 44:7–8.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. 1894. Notes on the Thelyphonidae contained in the collection of the British Museum. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6(14): 120–134.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. 1911. A monograph of the terrestrial Carboniferous Arachnida of Great Britain. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 84 p, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Pruvost, P. 1927. La faune du terrain houiller de Bruay dans le Bassin de Kaping (Chine). Annales de la Société Geologique du Nord, 52:168–173.Google Scholar
Rowland, J. M. and Cooke, J. A. L. 1973. Systematics of the arachnid order Uropygida (=Thelyphonida). The Journal of Arachnology, 1:55–71.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1884. A contribution to our knowledge of Palaeozoic Arachnida. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Science, 20:15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1885. 3. Classe. Arachnoidea. Spinnen. Skorpione, p. 732–746. In von Zittel, K. A. (ed.), Handbuch der Palaeontologie, I. Abtheilung, II. Band. R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1886. Systematic review of our present knowledge of fossil insects, including myriapods and arachnids. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey, 31:1–128.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1890. Illustrations of the Carboniferous Arachnida of North America. Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History, 4:443–456.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1891. Index to the known fossil insects of the world including myriapods and arachnids. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey, 71:1–744.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A. 1993. Arthropoda (Aglaspidida, Pycnogonida and Chelicerata), p. 297–320In Benton, M. J. (ed.), The Fossil Record 2. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Shultz, J. W. 1993. Muscular anatomy of the giant whipscorpion Mastigoproctus giganteus (Lucas) (Arachnida: Uropygi) and its evolutionary significance. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 108:335–365.Google Scholar
Spelter, E. A. M. 1933. [Untitled]. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 76:iv–v.Google Scholar
Thorell, T. 1883. Descrizione di alcuni Aracnidi inferiori dell'Arcipelago Malese. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova, 18:21–69.Google Scholar
Waterlot, G. 1949. Les Arachnides fossiles, p. 893–905. In Grassé, P.-P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie, Volume 6. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Waterlot, G. 1953. Classe des Arachnides (Arachnida Cuvier 1812), p. 555–584. In Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie, Volume 3. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Werner, F. 1935. Klasse Arachnoidea, Spinnentiere. Pedipalpen, p. 317–490. In Bronn, H. G. (ed.), Klassen und Ordnung des Tierreichs 5(IV)(8)(3). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Weygoldt, P. 1971. Notes on the life history and reproductive biology of the giant whip scorpion, Mastigoproctus giganteus (Uropygi, Thelyphonidae) from Florida. Journal of Zoology, London, 164:137–147.Google Scholar
Weygoldt, P. 2000. Whip Spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi). Their Biology, Morphology and Systematics. Apollo Books, Stenstrup.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von 1885. Handbuch der Palæontologie, Volume 2. Druck und Verlag von R. Oldenbourg, München.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von 1900. Text-book of Palaeontology, English edition, Volume 1. MacMillan and Co., London.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von 1924. Grundzüge der Paläontologie (Paläozoologie). R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Berlin.Google Scholar