Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:21:50.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pennsylvanian sponges from the Graford Formation, Wise County, Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

J. Keith Rigby ,
Mark G. McKinzie  and
Brooks B. Britt
J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, S-389 Eyring Science Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-4606, ;
Mark G. McKinzie
Affiliation:
22316 Ridge Lane, Grapevine, Texas 76051,
Brooks B. Britt
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, S-389 Eyring Science Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-4606, ;
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A variety of Pennsylvanian sponges have been recovered from exposures along the shore of Lake Bridgeport and in nearby areas in Wise County, north-central Texas. Calcareous and hexactinellid sponges have locally weathered out of the Jasper Creek Shale (= upper Lake Bridgeport Shale) and the overlying Devil's Den Limestone of the Graford Formation, of Late Pennsylvanian Missourian age.

The Demospongea protomonaxonids Heliospongia excavata King, 1933, and Coelocladia spinosa Girty, 1908 are represented in the studied collections by several specimens, as is the new genus and species Luterospongia texana. Agelasid ceractinomorph demosponges are represented by the fissispongiid Fissispongia jacksboroensis King, 1938, the maeandrostiid Maeandrostia kansasensis Girty, 1908, and the girtycoeliid, Girtycoelia typica King, 1933. Sponges of the Class Hexactinellida and the amphidiscophorid Family Stiodermatidae are represented by an extensive suite of specimens of the new genus and species Dermosphaeroidalis irregularis. Representatives of the hexactinellid reticulosid sponges include some unusually large specimens of the vase-shaped Endoplegma calathus Finks, 1960, of the Family Docodermatidae, and fragmental specimens of ?Stereodictyum orthoplectum Finks, 1960, of the Family Stereodictyidae. One unclassified root tuft fragment is also described and illustrated.

Much of this diverse sponge fauna was endemic to the western embayment of Pangaea.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 492 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beede, J. W. 1900. Carboniferous invertebrates. Kansas Geological Survey, v. 6, p. 14–16, fig. 2f.Google Scholar
Billings, Elkanah. 1865. On some new or little-known species of lower Silurian fossils from the Potsdam Group (Primordial Zone). In Palaeozoic Fossils, Volume 1, Containing descriptions and figures of new or little known species of organic remains from the Silurian rocks. Geological Survey of Canada. Bailliere. London, New York, and Paris. 426 p., 399 figs.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S. 1864. A monograph of the British Spongiadae, Volume 1. Ray Society, London, 290 p., 37 pls.Google Scholar
De Laubenfels, M. W. 1955. Porifera, p. 21–112, figs. 14-89. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E, Archaeocyatha and Porifera. Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas Press. New York and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Erxleben, A. W. 1973. Depositional systems in the Pennsylvanian Canyon Group of north-central Texas. In Brown, L. F., Cleaves, A. W. II, and Erxleben, A. W. (eds.), Pennsylvanian Systems in North Central Texas. University of Texas—Bureau of Economic Geology, Guidebook 14.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region: The siliceous sponges. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin 121, 160 p., 50 pls., 77 figs.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1971. A new Permian eutaxicladine demosponge, mosaic evolution, and the origin of the Dicranocladina. Journal of Paleontology, v. 45, p. 977–997, 5 figs., pl. 117-122.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. and Rigby, J. K. 2004a. Paleozoic Demosponges, p. 9–173, figs. 1-126. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E, Porifera (revised), Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. and Rigby, J. K. 2004b. Paleozoic Hexactinellid Sponges, p. 320–448, figs. 384-504. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E, Porifera (revised), Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. and Rigby, J. K. 2004c. Hypercalcified Sponges, p. 585–763, figs. 384-504. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E, Porifera (revised), Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1908a. The Guadalupian fauna. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 58, 651 p., 31 pls.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1908b. On some new and old species of Carboniferous fossils. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, v. 34, p. 281–303, pls. 14-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1912 (1911). On some new genera and old species of Pennsylvanian fossils from the Wewoka Formation of Oklahoma. Annual Report of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 21, p. 119–156.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1899 (1898). A memoir of the Paleozoic reticulate sponges constituting the family Dictyospongidae. New York State Museum Memoir 2, 350 p., 70 pl., 45 figs.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1888. A monograph of the British fossil sponges, Pt. 2, Sponges of the Paleozoic group. Paleontographical Society, v. 41, p. 93–188, pl. 9.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1933. A Pennsylvanian sponge fauna from Wise County, Texas. Texas University Bulletin 3201, p. 75–85, pls. 7, 8.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1938. Pennsylvanian sponges of north-central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, v. 12, no. 5, p. 498–504, 14 figs.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1943. New Carboniferous and Permian sponges. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Kansas, v. 47, p. 498–504, figs. 1-14.Google Scholar
Lendenfeld, Robert von. 1887. On the systematic position and classification of sponges. Zoological Society of London Proceedings, 1886. p. 558–662.Google Scholar
Lévi, Claude. 1953. Sur une nouvelle classification des Démosponges. Académie des Sciences (Paris), Comptes Rendus des séances, v. 236, p. 853–855.Google Scholar
McKinzie, Mark G. 1995. Paleoecology of a sponge-crinoid community. Mid America Paleontological Society (MAPS) Expo XVII edition, Crinoids, p. 28–34.Google Scholar
Mehl, Dorte. 1996. Phylogenie und Evolutionsökologie der Hexactinellida (Porifera) im Paläozoikum. Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck, v. 4, p. 1–55, 7 pls., 15 figs.Google Scholar
Mehl-Janussen, D. 1999. Dei frühe Evolution der Porifera, Phylogenie und Evolutionsökologie der Poriferen im Paläozoikum mit Schwerpunkt der desmentragenden Demospongiae (-Lithistide-). Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Reihe A, Geologie und Paläontologie, no. 37, 72 p.Google Scholar
Mostler, Helfreid and Mosleh-Yazdi, A. 1976. Neue Poriferen aus oberkambrischen Gesteinen der Milaformation im Elburzgebirge (Iran). Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck, v. 5, no. 1, p. 1–36, 5 pls., 25 figs.Google Scholar
Petty, A. J. Jr. 1975. Biostratigraphy of the Graford Formation, Missourian, Wise County, Texas. Unpublished MS Thesis, The University of Texas at El Paso, 76 p.Google Scholar
Plummer, F. B. 1919. Preliminary paper on the stratigraphy of the Pennsylvanian formations of north-central Texas. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 3, p. 133–145, 3 figs.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1958. A monograph of the Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Pt. 1. Palaeontographical Society Monograph. London. p. i–xlvi.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1970. Two new Upper Devonian hexactinellid sponges from Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, v. 44, p. 7–16, pls. 3, 4, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Blodgett, R. B. 1983. Early Middle Devonian sponges from the McGrath Quadrangle of west-central Alaska. Journal of Paleontology, v. 57, p. 773–786, 4 figs.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Mapes, R. H. 2000. Some Pennsylvanian and Permian sponges from southwestern Oklahoma and north-central Texas. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, v. 45, p. 25–67, 6 pls., 6 figs.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Senowbari-Daryan, Baba. 1996. Upper Permian inozoid, demospongid, and hexactinellid sponges from Djebel Tebaga, Tunisia. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions (new series), v. 7, 130 p., 81 pls.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Oscar. 1870. Grundzuge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Jena. Leipzig. p. i–iv, 1-88, 6 pls.Google Scholar
Schrammen, Anton. 1924. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeutschland, III und letzter Teil. In Soergel, W., ed., Monographien zur Geologie und Palaeontologie, serie 1, heft 2. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger. Berlin, 159 p., 17 pls.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1887. Report on the Hexactinellida collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. Reports of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger, Zoology, v. 21, 513 p., 104 pls., 1 map.Google Scholar
Scott, Gayle, and Armstrong, J. M. 1932. The geology of Wise County, Texas. Texas University Bulletin 3224, 77 p., 2 pls., 7 figs.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1885. A classification of the sponges. Annals of Natural History (series 5), v. 16, p. 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1951. Pennsylvanian crinoids from Lake Bridgeport, Texas. Journal of Paleontology, v. 25, no. 2, p. 200–207.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1907. Porifera of the Bermuda Islands. New Haven, Connecticut, Transactions of the Academy of Arts and Sciences, v. 12, p. 330–344.Google Scholar