Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:56:21.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A redescription of a rare chordate, Metaspriggina Walcotti Simonetta and Insom, from the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian), British Columbia, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Simon Conway Morris
Simon Conway Morris*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, England,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Until Recently, our understanding of the earliest history of the fish has been fragmentary in terms of the fossil record and conjectural with respect to many details of phylogeny. Fortunately, significant new information has become available in recent years, most notably from the discoveries of at least three taxa of agnathan fish from the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte of Yunnan, China (Shu et al., 1999, 2003; Shu, 2003; see also Hou et al., 2002; Hou et al., 2004, p. 192-193; Zhang and Hou, 2004). Two of the taxa (Haikouichthys and Zhangjianichthys) are represented by numerous specimens, but it is noteworthy that amongst the forty-odd Burgess Shale-type occurrences apart from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte, chordates (or indeed cephalochordates and urochordates) are otherwise unknown. The one exception is the Burgess Shale itself, characterized by the rather enigmatic Pikaia gracilens (Conway Morris, 1982, 1998) and the much rarer chordate described herein. Apart from this exceptionally preserved material, the fossil record effectively only begins in the Ordovician (e.g., Sansom et al., 2001, 2005; Sansom and Smith, 2005), in as much putative fish scales from the latest Cambrian (Young et al., 1996) may be better interpreted as arthropodan (see Smith et al., 2001, p. 78). The difficulties of interpreting what is overall an extremely patchy record are further compounded by the fact that the relevance to this early history of the extant agnathan hagfish and lamprey has remained (and indeed to some extent remains) problematic, given the uncertainty as to which of the presumed archaic features have been overprinted by specializations for modes of life that might have had little counterpart in the ancestral forms.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , March 2008 , pp. 424 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, L. E. and Zhang, W.-T. 2001. Stratigraphy, paleontology, and depositional setting of the Chengjiang Lagerstätte (Lower Cambrian), Yunnan, China, p. 66–86. In Peng, S.-C., Babcock, L. E., and Zhu, M.-Y. (eds.), Cambrian System of South China. Palaeoworld, no. 13. Press of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., Erwin, D. H., and Collier, F. J. 1994. The Fossils of the Burgess Shale. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. 1990. Organic preservation of non-mineralizing organisms and the taphonomy of the Burgess Shale. Paleobiology, 16:272–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. 2000. The oldest? and the youngest? Burgess Shale assemblages in North America, Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, 32:301.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. 2002. Leanchoilia guts and the interpretation of the three-dimensional structures in Burgess Shale-type fossils. Paleobiology, 28:155–171.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. 2003. Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian explosion. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 43:166–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caron, J.-B. and Jackson, D. A. 2006. Taphonomy of the Greater Phyllopod Bed community, Burgess Shale. Palaios, 21:451–465.Google Scholar
Caron, J.-B., Scheltema, A., Schander, C., and Rudkin, D. 2006. A soft-bodied mollusc with radula from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Nature, 442:159–163.Google Scholar
Chen, J.-Y., Dzik, J., Edgecombe, G. D., Ramsköld, L., and Zhou, G.-Q. 1995. A possible Early Cambrian chordate. Nature, 377:720–722.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 1979. The Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) fauna. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10:327–349.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 1982. Pikaia gracilens Walcott, 1911, p. 26. In Morris, Conway (ed.), Atlas of the Burgess Shale. Palaeontological Association, London.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 1989. The persistence of Burgess Shale-type faunas: Implications for the evolution of deeper-water faunas. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 80:271–283.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 1998. The Crucible of Creation: The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 2006. Darwin's dilemma: The realities of the Cambrian ‘explosion’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 361:1069–1083.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 2000. The origin of the mineral skeleton in chordates. Evolutionary Biology, 31:105–154.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. R. and Droser, M. L. 2005. New approaches to understanding the mechanics of Burgess Shale-type deposits: From the micron scale to the global picture. The Sedimentary Record, 2005 (June):4–8.Google Scholar
Hou, X-G., Aldridge, R. J., Siveter, D. J., Siveter, D. J., and Feng, X.-H. 2002. New evidence on the anatomy and phylogeny of the earliest vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269:1865–1869.Google Scholar
Hou, X-G., Aldridge, R. J., Bergström, J., Siveter, D. J., Siveter, D. J., and Feng, X.-H. 2004. The Cambrian Fossils of Chengjiang, China: The Flowering of Early Animal Life. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Insom, E., Pucci, A., and Simonetta, A. M. 1995. Cambrian Protochordata, their origin and significance. Bolletino di Zoologia, 62:243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janvier, P. 1998. Les vertébrés avant le Silurien. GeoBios, 30:931–950.Google Scholar
Orr, P. G., Kearns, S. L., and Briggs, D. E. G. 2002. Backscattered electron imaging of fossils exceptionally-preserved as organic impressions. Palaios, 17:110–117.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sansom, I. J., Donoghue, P. C. J., and Albanesi, A. G. 2005. Histology and affinity of the earliest armoured vertebrate. Biological Letters, 1:446–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sansom, I. J. and Smith, M. P. 2005. Late Ordovician vertebrates from the Bighorn Mountains of Wyoming, USA. Palaeontology, 48:31–48.Google Scholar
Sansom, I. J., Smith, M. M., and Smith, M. P. 2001. The Ordovician radiation of vertebrates, p. 156–171. In Ahlberg, P. E. (ed.), Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution: Palaeontology, Phylogeny, Genetics and Development. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., Grazhdankin, D., and Legouta, A. 2003. Ediacaran biota: The dawn of animal life in the shadow of giant protists. Paleontological Research (Japan), 7:43–54.Google Scholar
Shu, D.-G. 2003. A paleontological perspective of vertebrate origin. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48:725–735.Google Scholar
Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., and Zhang, X.-L. 1996. A Pikaia-like chordate from the Lower Cambrian of China. Nature, 384:157–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., Han, J., Zhang, Z.-F., Yasui, K., Janvier, P., Chen, L., Zhang, X.-L., Liu, J.-N., Li, Y., and Liu, H.-Q. 2003. Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys. Nature, 421: 526–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., Han, J., Zhang, Z.-F., and Liu, J.-N. 2004. Ancestral echinoderms from the Chengjiang deposits of China. Nature, 430: 422–428.Google Scholar
Shu, D.-G., Luo, L.-H., Conway Morris, S., Zhang, X.-L., Hu, S.-X., Chen, L., Han, J., Zhu, M., Li, Y., and Chen, L.-Z. 1999. Lower Cambrian vertebrates from South China. Nature, 402:42–46.Google Scholar
Simonetta, A. M. and Insom, E. 1993. New animals from the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) and their possible significance for the understanding of the Bilateria. Bolletino di Zoologia, 60:97–107.Google Scholar
Smith, M. P., Sansom, I. J., and Cochrane, K. D. 2001. The Cambrian origin of vertebrates, p. 67–84. In Ahlberg, P. E. (ed.), Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution: Palaeontology, Phylogeny, Genetics and Development. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Waggoner, B. M. 1996. Phylogenetic hypotheses of the relationships of arthropods to Precambrian and Cambrian problematic taxa. Systematic Biology, 45:190–222.Google Scholar
Young, G. C., Karatajute-Talimaa, V. N., and Smith, M. M. 1996. A possible late Cambrian vertebrate from Australia. Nature, 383:810–812.Google Scholar
Zhang, X.-G. and Hou, X.-G. 2004. Evidence for a single median fin-fold and tail in the Lower Cambrian vertebrate, Haikouichthys ercaicunensis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17:1162–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed