Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:39:35.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contention and Compromise: a Comparative Analysis of Budgetary Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Thomas R. Cusack
Thomas R. Cusack
Affiliation:
Political Scientist Globus Research Group Science Center Berlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper attempts to place the role of defense spending within the overall context of the budgetary process. Using an extended version of the ‘Competing Aspirations Level Model’ based on the behavioral theory of decision-making, major budgetary aggregates, total spending, defense spending, exhaustive civilian expenditures, and capital outlays, are modelled as outcomes of independently generated aspirations, based on parochial organizational and environmental influences, and a reconciliation process reflecting the bargaining power of budgetary agents. An empirical assessment of the model's performance is conducted using the experience of thirteen national governments, including seven western industrialized states and six developing states. The results of this statistical analysis suggest that the model provides a useful basis for understanding and comparing budgetary processes and outcomes.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1985 , pp. 497 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, P. (1983) Crisis Bargaining and the Arms Race: A Theoretical Model. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Alt, J. E. and Chrystal, K. A. (1983) Political Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Auten, G., Bozeman, B., and Cline, R. (1984) ‘A Sequential Model of Congressional Appropriations.’ American Journal of Political Science 28:503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, E. E. (1980) ‘The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 24:143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom, C. E. (1963) A Strategy of Decision. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Crecine, J. P. (1969) Governmental Problem-Solving. A Computer Simulation of Municipal Budgeting. Chicago: Rand, McNally.Google Scholar
Crecine, J. P. (1971) ‘Defense Budgeting: Organizational Adaptation to Environmental Constraints,’ in R. F. Byrne et al., Studies in Budgeting. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Cusack, T. R. (1981) ‘The Sinews of Power: Labor and Capital in the Production of National Military Force Capability.’ Publication Series of the International Institute for Comparative Social Research, Science Center Berlin (IIVG/dp 81/126).Google Scholar
Cusack, T. R. (1985a) ‘The Evolution of Power, Threat and Security: Past and Potential Developments.’ International Interactions 12:151–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, T. R. (1985b, forthcoming) ‘Meeting Threats from the International System: Self-Reliance and Dependence on Allies.’Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dabelko, D. and McCormick, J. M. (1977) ‘Opportunity Costs of Defense: Some Cross-National Evidence,’ Journal of Peace Research 14:145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, O. A., Dempster, M. A. H., and Wildavsky, A. (1966) ‘A Theory of the Budgetary Process.’ American Political Science Review 60:524–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, K. W. and Singer, J. D. (1964) ‘Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability.’ World Politics 16:390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G. W. and Crecine, J. (1979) ‘Defense Budgets, Fiscal Policy, Domestic Spending, and Arms Races: A Positive Model of the Great Budgetary Tradeoffs.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. W. and Kamlet, M. S. (1984) ‘Exploring Presidential Priorities: The Competing Aspiration Levels Model of Macrobudgetary Decision-Making.’ American Political Science Review 78:356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S. (1978) ‘Politico-Economic Models and Cycles.’ Journal of Public Economics 9:203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S. and Schneider, F. (1981) ‘Recent Research on Empirical Politico-Economic Models,’ in Hibbs, D. A. and Fassbender, H. (eds.), Contemporary Political Economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gist, J. (1982) ‘Stability and Competition in Budgetary Theory.’ American Political Science Review 76:859–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, R. and Birnbaum, E. A. (1956) ‘Government Capital Budgets.’ International Monetary Fund: Staff Papers 5:23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoole, F. W. (1976) Politics and Budgeting in the World Health Organization. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies (various vols.) The Military Balance. London: IISS.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (various vols.) The Costs of Social Security. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (various vols.) Yearbook of Labour Statistics. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (1977) Labour Force Estimates and Projections: 1950–2000. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (various vols.) Government Financial Statistics. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (various vols.) International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Jarrouge, A. I. (1979) System Capability and Development: A Model of Public Fiscal Behavior. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. C. (1977) ‘Demographic Change and the Size of the Government Sector.’ Southern Journal of Economics 43:1056–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, D. (1981) ‘The Dynamic Behavior of Public Budgets: An Empirical Study of Australian Local Governments.’ The Review of Economics and Statistics 63:422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkey, P. D., Stolp, C. and Winer, M. (1981) ‘Theorizing About the Growth of Government: A Research Assessment.’ Journal of Public Policy 1:157–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Loup, L. T., (1978) ‘The Myth of Incrementalism; Analytic Choices in Budgetary Theory’, Polity 10:488–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, G. (1984) ‘Armaments and Economic Performance in Industrialized market Economies.’ Journal of Peace Research 21:375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lioukas, S. K. and Chambers, D. J. (1981) ‘The Boundary between Planning and Incremental Budgeting: Empirical Examination in a Publicly-Owned Corporation.’ Management Science 27:1421–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, D. and Berry, W. D. (1983) ‘The Growth of Government in the United States: An Empirical Assessment of Competing Explanations.’ American Journal of Political Science 27:665–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1969) Fiscal Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nincic, M. and Cusack, T. R. (1979) ‘The Political Economy of US. Military Spending.’ Journal of Peace Research 16:101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (1976a) Public Expenditure On Income Maintenance Programs. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1976b) Public Expenditure On Education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1977) Public Expenditure On Health. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Ostrom, C. (1978) ‘A Reactive Linkage Model of the US Defense Policymaking Process.’ American Political Science Review 72: 941–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattinger, H. (1975) ‘Armaments, Detente, and Bureaucracy: The Case of the Arms Race in Europe.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 19:571–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, B. M. (1983) ‘International Interactions and Processes: The Internal vs. External Debate Revisited.’ In Finifter, A. W. (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955) ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 69:99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956) ‘Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.’ Psychological Review 63:129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A. (1964) ‘On the Concept of Organizational Goal.’ Administrative Science Quarterly 9:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. D. (1958) ‘Threat Perception and the Armament-Tension Dilemma.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 2:90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (various vols.) World Armaments and Disarmament, Sipri Yearbook. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Tarschys, D. (1975) ‘The Growth of Public Expenditures: Nine Modes of Explanation.’ Scandanavian Political Studies 10:9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (various vols.) Statistical Yearbook. New York: UN.Google Scholar
United Nations (various vols.) Yearbook of National Account Statistics. New York: UN.Google Scholar
Ward, M. D. (1984) ‘Differential Paths to Parity: A Study of the Contemporary Arms Race.’ American Political Science Review 78:297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1975) Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (1975) The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (various years) World Tables from the Data Files of the World Bank. (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press).Google Scholar