Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:21:14.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Process Sequencing Policy Dynamics: Beyond Homeostasis and Path Dependency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2009

Michael Howlett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of policy change have advanced to the point where the basic contours and factors driving policy sequences are now reasonably well identified and understood with a great deal of empirical evidence pointing to the prevalence of punctuated equilibrium processes in many policy fields. However the reasons why such processes occur is less well understood. Most attention to date has focused upon homeostatic models in which exogenously-driven shocks undermine institutionally entrenched policy equilibria. This article addresses the difficulties this account faces and the conceptual challenges which must be overcome to provide a solid grounding for the understanding and analysis of long-term policy dynamics. It focuses on the merits and demerits of alternative explanations featuring either random junctures and ‘positive-return’ sequences – path dependency – or embedded junctures and ‘reactive’ sequences – process sequencing. Models of policy-making over time using the latter two concepts, it is argued, are more likely to account for the large majority of policy dynamic than the former.

Keywords

path dependenceequilibriumsequencingjunctures
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 241 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. “Conceptions of Time and Events in Social Science Methods.” Historical Methods. 23, no. 4 (1990): 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. “On the Concept of Turning Point.” Comparative Social Research. 16(1997): 85–105.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. “Transcending General Linear Reality.” Sociological Theory. 6(1988): 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Aminzade, Ronald. “Historical Sociology and Time.” Sociological Methods and Research. 20, no. 4 (1992): 456–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events.” The Economic Journal. 99(1989): 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. “Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics.” In Anderson, P. W., Arrow, K. J. and Pines, D., ed(s), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, Redwood City: Addison Wesley, 1988.Google Scholar
Arts, B., Leroy, P., and van Tatenhove, J.. 2006. “Political Modernisation and Policy Arrangements: A framework for Understanding Environmental Policy Change.” Public Organization Review 6:93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. (1970). Power and Poverty : Theory and Practice. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene. 2006. “Policy Dynamics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, ed. Moran, M., Rein, M. and Goodin, R. E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Breunig, Christian, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, Jones, Bryan D., Mortensen, Peter B., Nuytemans, Michael, Walgrave, Stafaan, “Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective” in American Journal of Political Science 53(3) July 2009 pp. 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002a.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D. “Positive and Negative Feedback in Politics.” In Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D., ed(s), Policy Dynamics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002b.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J., and Howlett, M. 1992. The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change. Policy Sciences 25 (3):275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William T.“The Confusing Case of Budgetary Incrementalism: Too Many Meanings for a Single Concept.” Journal of Politics. 52(1990): 167–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, Gwyn and Robinson, Ray. “The Interplay between Economic and Political Logics: Path Dependency in Health Care in England.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 30, no. 1–2 (2005): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleich, E. 2006. “Institutional Continuity and Change: Norms, Lesson-Drawing, and the Introduction of Race-Conscious Measures in the 1976 British Race Relations Act.” Policy Studies 27 (3):219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bode, I. 2006. “Disorganized Welfare Mixes: Voluntary Agencies and New Governance Regimes in Western Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (4):346–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botcheva, L., and Martin, L. L.. 2001. “Institutional Effects on State Behaviour: Convergence and Divergence.” International Studies Quarterly 45:1–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, S. (1990). “Canadian Women's Groups in the 1980s: Organizational Development and Policy Influence.” Canadian Public Policy 16(1): 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buthe, Tim. “Taking Temporarility Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence.” American Political Science Review. 96, no. 3 (2002): 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Shane. 2009. “Obstacles to the Implementation of an Integrated National Alcohol Policy in Ireland: Nannies, Neo-Liberals and Joined-Up Government.” Journal of Social Policy 38 (2):343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. “Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory.” American Journal of Sociology. 104, no. 3 (1998): 846–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, Giliberto, and Howlett, Michael. 2009. “The Determinants of Policy Change: Advancing the Debate.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (1):1–5.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, and Howlett, Michael. 2007. Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry. American Journal of Political Science 51 (3):532–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, E. S., and Cook, J. M. 1999. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 25:441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courchene, Thomas J. “Path-Dependency, Positive Feedback and Paradigm Warp: A Schumpeterian Approach to the Social Order.” In Reynolds, E. B., ed(s), Income Security in Canada: Changing Needs, Changing Means, Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1993. 43–82.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert. “The Path-Dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain Distinct.” Social Policy and Administration. 38, no. 2 (2004): 204–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A., and Lindblom, C. E.Politics, Economics and Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social Processes. New York: Harper and Row, 1953.Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1985). “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” The American Economic Review 75(2): 332–337.Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1986). Understanding the Economics of QWERTY: The Necessity of History. Economic History and the Modern Economist. Parker, W. N.. London, Basil Blackwell: 30–49.Google Scholar
Daugbjerg, Carsten. 2009. “Sequencing in Public Policy: the Evolution of the CAP over a Decade.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (2):395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, M. S. 2000. “The Secret and Cost of Success: Institutional Change and Policy Change.” In Governance in Modern Society: Effects, Change and Formation of Government Institutions, ed. Van Heffen, O., Kickert, W. J. M. and Thomassen, J. J. A.. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
de Vries, M. S. 2005a. “Generations of interactive Policy-Making in the Netherlands.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 71 (4):577–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Michiel. 2005b. “Changing Policy Views at the Local Level: The Effect of Age, Generations and Policy-Periods in Five European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (1):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Michiel S. 1999. “Developments in Europe: The Idea of Policy Generations” International Review of Administrative Sciences 65 (4):491–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeg, Richard. “Path Dependency, Institutional Complementarity and Change in National Business Systems.” In Morgan, G., Whitley, R. and Moen, E., ed(s), Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005a. 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeg, Richard. 2005b. “Change from Within: German and Italian Finance in the 1990s.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. Streeck, W. and Thelen, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deeg, Richard. Institutional Change and the Uses and Limits of Path Dependency: The Case of German Finance. Koln: Max Planck Institute fur Gesellschaftsforschung MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/6, 2001.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Lauire, and Quack, Sigrid. 2007. “Overcoming Path Dependency: Path Generation in Open Systems.” Theory and Society 36:161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2008. Sociological Studies of Diffusion: Is History Relevant? Socio-Economic Review 6:538–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrowolsky, Alexandra and Saint-Martin, Denis. “Agency, Actors and Change in a Child-Focused Future ‘Path Dependency’ Problematised.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics. 43, no. 1 (2005): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2005. “Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform.” In MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/2. Cologne: Max Planck Institut fur Gesellschaftforschung.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles and Gould, Stephen Jay. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Schopf, T. J. M., ed(s), Paleobiology, San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, 1972. 82–115.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Maureen H. 2004. “Punctuated Equilibrium, Moral Panics and the Ethics Review Press.” Journal of Academic Ethics 2:315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gains, Francesca, John, Peter C., and Stoker, Gerry. “Path Dependency and the Reform of English Local Government.” Public Administration. 83, no. 1 (2005): 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genschel, P. 1997. “The Dynamics of Inertia: Institutional Persistence and Change in Telecommunications and Health care.” Governance 10 (1):43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander and Bennett, Andrew. “Process Tracing and Historical Explanation.” In George, A. and Bennett, A., ed(s), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Gersick, Connie J. G.“Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multilevel Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm.” Academy of Management Review. 16, no. 1 (1991): 10–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gildiner, Alina. 2007. “The Organization of Decision-making and the Dynamics of Policy Drift: A Canadian Health Sector Example.” Social Policy and Administration 41 (5):505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Klaus H., and Mayer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009. “Political Time in the EU: Dimensions, Perspectives. Theories.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (2):180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay and Eldredge, Niles. “Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered.” Paleobiology. 3, no. 115–151 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greener, Ian. “The Potential of Path Dependence in Political Studies.” Politics. 25, no. 1 (2005): 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greener, Ian. “Theorizing Path-Dependency: How Does History Come to Matter in Organizations?” Management Decision. 40, no. 5/6 (2002a): 614–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greener, Ian. “Understanding NHS Reform: The Policy-Transfer, Social Learning and Path Dependency Perspectives.” Governance. 15, no. 2 (2002b): 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, Scott L. 2008. “Choosing Paths in European Union Health Services Policy: A Political Analysis of a Critical Juncture.” Journal of European Social Policy 18 (3):219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Larry. “Temporality, Events and Explanation in Historical Sociology.” Sociological Methods and Research. 20, no. 4 (1992): 403–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, J. S. 2004. “Reform Without Change, Change Without Reform: The Politics of US Health Policy Reform in Comparative Perspective.” In Transatlantic Policymaking in an Age of Austerity: Diversity and Drift, ed. Levin, M. A. and Shapiro, M.. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S.The Divided Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A.“Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain.” Comparative Politics. 25, no. 3 (1993): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. “The Change from Keynesianism to Monetarism: Institutional Analysis and British Economic Policy in the 1970s.” In Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F., ed(s), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 90–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 7:7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.“Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies. 44(1996): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., ed. The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haydu, Jeffrey. “Making Use of the Past: Time Periods as Cases to Compare and As Sequences of Problem Solving.” American Journal of Sociology. 104, no. 2 (1998): 339–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchins, Derek K.Systems Engineering: A 21st Century Systems Methodology New York: Wiley, 2008).Google Scholar
Hogan, John. “Remoulding the Critical Junctures Approach.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 39, no. 3 (2006): 657–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, John, and Doyle, David. “The Importance of Ideas: An a Priori Critical Juncture Framework.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40, no. 4 (2007): 883–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, John, and Doyle, David. “A Comparative Framework: How Broadly Applicable Is a ‘Rigorous’ Critical Junctures Framework?” Acta Politica 44, no. 2 (2009): 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogwood, B. W. and Peters, B. G. (1983) Policy Dynamics, Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Holzinger, K. and Knill, C. (2002). “Path Dependencies in European Integration.” Pubic Administration 80(1): 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael, and Cashore, Benjamin. 2009. “The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (1):33–46.Google Scholar
Howlett, M., and Rayner, J. 2006. “Understanding the Historical Turn in the Policy Sciences: A Critique of Stochastic, Narrative, Path Dependency and Process-Sequencing Models of Policy-Making over Time.” Policy Sciences 39 (1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. “Predictable and Unpredictable Policy Windows: Issue, Institutional and Exogenous Correlates of Canadian Federal Agenda-Setting.” Canadian Journal of Political Science. 31, no. 3 (1998): 495–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2009. “Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design” Policy Sciences 42 (1):73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Alan S. 2008. “The Politics of When: Redistribution, Investment and Policy Making for the Long Term.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (1):193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Peter and Margetts, Helen. “Policy Punctuations in the UK: Fluctuations and Equilibria in Central Government Expenditure Since 1951.” Public Administration. 81, no. 3 (2003): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. D., Baumgartner, F. R., and True, J. L. 1998. “Policy Punctuations: U.S. Budget Authority, 1947–1995.” The Journal of Economic Literature 60 (1):1–3.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Frank R.“A Model of Choice for Public Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 15, no. 3 (2005): 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Sulkin, Tracy, and Larsen, Heather A.“Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions.” American Political Science Review. 97, no. 1 (2003): 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Junko. “Review Article: Institutions and Rationality in Politics – Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalists.” British Journal of Political Science. 26(1996): 553–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Adrian. “A Critique of the Use of Path Dependency in Policy Studies.” Public Administration. 83, no. 3 (2005): 553–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Adrian. 2007. “Tense Layering and Synthetic Policy Paradigms: The Politics of Health Insurance in Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 42 (4):579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Adrian. The Dynamics of Public Policy: Theory and Evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeler, John T. S.“Opening the Window for Reform: Mandates, Crises and Extraordinary Policy-Making.” Comparative Political Studies. 25, no. 4 (1993): 433–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W.Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Kline, D. (2001). “Positive Feedback, Lock-In and Environmental Policy.” Policy Sciences 34 (1): 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhner, Stefan. 2007. “Country-Level Comparisons of Welfare State Change Measures: Another Facet of the Dependent Variable Problem Within the Comparative Analysis of the Welfare State.” Journal of European Social Policy 17 (1):5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, T. 1989. “Sparks and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution.” Public Choice 61:41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, T. 1991. “Now Out Of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44 (October):7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leman, C.“Patterns of Policy Development: Social Security in the United States and Canada.” Public Policy 25, no. 2 (1977): 261–291.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S.“Causal Inference in Historical Institutional Analysis: A Specification of Periodization Strategies.” Comparative Political Studies. 34, no. 9 (2001): 1011–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C.“Ideas, Institutions and Political Order: Explaining Political Change.” American Political Science Review. 96, no. 4 (2002): 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebowitz, S. and Margolis, S. E. (1995). “Policy and Path Dependence: From QWERTY to Windows 95.” Regulation 18: 33–41.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, S. J. and Margolis, S. E. (1990). “The Fable of the Keys.” Journal of Law and Economics 33: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, Johannes and Rittberger, Berthold. “The Creation, Interpretation and Contestation of Institutions – Revisiting Historical Institutionalism.” Journal of Common Market Studies. 41, no. 3 (2003): 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, Johannes. “Institutional Stability and Change: Two Sides of the Same Coin.” Journal of European Public Policy. 10, no. 6 (2003): 912–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2000). “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29(4): 507-548 at pages (pp. 510–511).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, ed. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, Kimball, Erin, and Koivu, Kendra L. 2008. “The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences.” Comparative Political Studies 42:114–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, and Goetz, Klaus H. 2009. “The EU Timescape: from Notion to Research Agenda.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (2):325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Allan. 2008. “Ripples Not Waves; A Policy Configuration Approach to Reform in the Wake of the 1968 Sydney Water Crisis.” Governance 21 (4):551–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, A. S. 1991. Interest Groups and Political Time: Cycles in America. British Journal of Political Science, 21:257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Glenn and Kubo, Izuma. “Beyond Path Dependency? Constructing New Models for Institutional Change: The Case of Capital Markets in Japan.” Socio-Economic Review. 3(2005): 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, P. B. 2005. “Policy Punctuations in Danish Local Budgeting.” Public Administration 83 (4):931–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namenwirth, J. Zvi 1973. “Wheels of Time and the Interdependence of Value Change in America” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 3 (4):649–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, V. and Cao, Y. (1999). “Path Dependent Societal Transformation: Stratification in Hybrid Mixed Economies.” Theory and Society 28: 799–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, A. and Neeley, G. (1996). “Toward an Explanation for Public Interest Group Formation and Proliferation: ‘Seed Money’, Disturbances, Entrepreneurship, and Patronage.” Policy Studies Journal 24(1): 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, A. J. (1995). “The Other Exchange: Public Interest Groups, Patrons, and Benefits.” Social Science Quarterly 76(2): 381–401.Google Scholar
Nownes, A. J. (2000). “Policy Conflict and the Structure of Interest Communities.” American Politics Quarterly 28(3): 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, A. J. and Cigler, A. J. (1995). “Public Interest Groups and the Road to Survival.” Polity 27(3): 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. “The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change.” Governance. 13, no. 4 (2000a): 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000b). “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. “Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes.” Studies in American Political Development. 14(2000c): 72-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time : History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2008. Time, Policy, Management: Governing with the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rahnema, S. and Howlett, M. (2002). “Impediments to Industrial Policy: Overcoming Path Dependency in Canada's Post Staples Transition.” Journal of Australian Political Economy 49: 114–135.Google Scholar
Rayner, J., Howlett, M., et al. (2001). “Privileging the Sub-Sector: Critical Sub-Sectors and Sectoral Relationships in Forest Policy-Making.” Forest Policy and Economics 2(3–4): 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rico, Ana and Costa-Font, Joan. “Power Rather than Path Dependency? The Dynamics of Institutional Change under Health Care Federalism.” Journal of health Politics, Policy and Law. 30, no. 1–2 (2005): 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Scott E. 2007. “Punctuated Equilibrium Models in Organizational Decision Making.” In Handbook of Decision Making, ed. Morcol, G.. New York: CRC Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Robinson, Scott E., Caver, Flou'say, Meier, Kenneth J., and O'Toole, Lawrence J. Jr. 2007. “Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratization and Budget Change.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1):140–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rona-Tas, A. (1998). “Path Dependence and Capital Theory: Sociology of the Post-Communist Economic Transformation.” East European Politics and Societies 12(1): 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. “Models of Change.” In The Dynamics of Public Policy: A Comparative Analysis, edited by Rose, R., 7–33. London: Sage, 1976.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A., and Jenkins-Smith, H. C. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A.“An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences. 21, no. 2/3 (1988): 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldana, Johnny. Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change Through Time. New York: Altamira, 2003.Google Scholar
Schattschnieder, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2007. “Mapping Contingency.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental and the Unforeseen, ed. Shapiro, I. and Bedi, S.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A., and Radaelli, C. M. 2004. “Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues.” West European Politics 27 (2):183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11:303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H. 2008. “The Temporalities of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 6:517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, D. -H. 2006. “Convergence of Telecommunications, Media and Information Technology, and Implications for Regulations.” Info – The Journal of Policy, regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications 8 (1):42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T., Ganz, M., et al. (2000). “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94(3): 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. Alexander. 1988. Time and Public Policy. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Somers, M. R. 1996. Where is Sociology after the Historic Turn? Knowledge Cultures, Narrativity, and Historical Epistemologies. In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by McDonald, T. J.. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sousa, David J., and McGrory Klyza, Christopher. 2007. “New Directions in Environmental Policy Making: An Emerging Collaborative Regime of Reinventing Interest Group Liberalism.” Natural Resources Journal 47 (2):377–444.Google Scholar
Sven, Steinmo, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank, ed. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. Streeck, W. and Thelen, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sydow, Jorg, Schreyogg, Georg, and Koch, Jochen. 2005. “Organizational Paths: Path Dependency and Beyond.” In 2nd EGOS Colloquium. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D., ed(s), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 208–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, J. (2001). “Path-Dependent Danish Welfare Reforms: The Contribution of the New Institutionalisms to Understanding Evolutionary Change.” Scandinavian Political Studies 24(4): 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, James L.“Avalanches and Incrementalism: Making Policy and Budgets in the United States.” American Review of Public Administration. 30, no. 1 (2000): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, James L., Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R. “Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in American Policymaking.” In Sabatier, P. A., ed, Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder: Westview Press, 1999. 97–115.Google Scholar
van Buuren, Arwin, and Gerrits, Lasse. 2008. “Decisions as Dynamic Equilibriums in Erratic Policy Processes: Positive and Negative Feedback as Drivers of Non-Linear Policy Dynamics.” Public Management Review 10 (3):381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Bertalanffy, Ludwig, General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications London: George Braziller 1969.Google Scholar
Wilsford, D. (1994). “Path Dependency, or Why History Makes It Difficult but Not Impossible to Reform Health Care Systems in A Big Way.” Journal of Public Policy 14(3): 251–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilsford, David. “The Conjoncture of Ideas and Interests.” Comparative Political Studies. 18, no. 3 (1985): 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. S. 2006. The Dynamics of Incrementalism: Subsystems, Politics and Public Lands. Policy Studies Journal 34 (1):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workman, Samuel, Jones, Bryan D., and Jochim, Ashley E. 2009. Information Processing and Policy Dynamics. Policy Studies Journal 37 (1):75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarkin, Michael J. 2008. Organisational Learning in novel policy situations: two cases of United States communications regulation. Policy Studies 29 (1):87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar