Employment and social policies continue to be based upon a gender template
that assumes women, especially mothers, are or should be natural
carers. Invariably, policies that seek to promote women's entry to paid
work do so by facilitating their management and conduct of caring work,
thus reinforcing the gender template. In addition, contemporary debates
around concepts of citizenship emphasise the obligation to paid employment
but fail to tackle the gendered division of caring activities and
organisation of care. Enhanced access to childcare merely recreates the
gender template by promoting low paid jobs for women as paid carers
who are predominantly providing care services for other women. The
provision of unpaid paternity leave is unlikely to challenge the strong
association between femininity, mothering and care work.
In this article we explore notions of caring, home and employment. It is
argued that ambivalence exists amongst policy makers, employers, and
society more generally, towards the gendered nature of caring and the
implications of this for women, and men who wish to care, who are in
paid employment. These are old issues and the authors consider why
change in social and public policies is so slow. The authors argue that a
consideration of gender and equality principles, currently largely absent
from welfare and employment policies, and debates on notions of citizenship,
should form the basis for the development of future strategies to support
parents and children.