Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:18:14.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Omissions as Events and Actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

KENNETH SILVER*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAkennethmsilver@gmail.com

Abstract

We take ourselves to be able to omit to perform certain actions and to be at times responsible for these omissions. Moreover, omissions seem to have effects and to be manifestations of our agency. So, it is natural to think that omissions must be events. However, very few people writing on this topic have been willing to argue that omissions are events. Such a view is taken to face three significant challenges: (i) omissions are thought to be somehow problematically negative, (ii) it is unclear where the event of an omission would be located, and (iii) if we accept any omissions as events, it seems like there would be far too much causation involving them. In this paper, I develop a novel view of omissions as events and as actions that provides answers to these challenges.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Kadri Vihvelin, Sara Bernstein, Gary Watson, Gabriel Uzquiano, John Hawthorne, Carolina Sartorio, and several anonymous referees for comments and/or discussion. I am sure to have omitted mentioning numerous people who helped me as I worked on this project. Unfortunately, on my view, these will be events for which I may be responsible.

References

Armstrong, David. (1999) ‘The Open Door’. In Sankey, Howard (ed.), Causation and the Laws of Nature (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), 175–85.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. (1980) ‘Actions Are Not Events’. Mind, 89, 114–20.Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen. (2004) ‘Causing and Nothingness’. In Collins, John, Hall, Ned, and Paul, L.A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 291308.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. (1988) Events and Their Names. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Sara. (2014a) ‘Omissions as Possibilities’. Philosophical Studies, 167, 123.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Sara. (2014b) ‘Two Problems for Proportionality about Omission’. Dialectica, 68, 429–41.Google Scholar
Bishop, John. (2010) ‘Skepticism about Natural Agency and the Causal Theory of Action’. In Aguilar, Jésus and Buckareff, Andrei A. (eds.), Causing Human Actions: New Perspectives on the Causal Theory of Action (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 6983.Google Scholar
Brand, Myles. (1971) ‘The Language of Not Doing’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 8, 4553.Google Scholar
Buckareff, Andrei. (2017) ‘I'm Just Sitting around Doing Nothing: On Exercising Intentional Agency in Omitting to Act’. Synthese, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1424-x.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph. (2014) Omissions: Agency, Metaphysics, and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. (1963) ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’. Journal of Philosophy, 60, 685700.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. (1971/2011) ‘Agency’. In Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 4361.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. (1985) ‘Replies to Essays I–IX’. In Vermazen, Bruce and Hintikka, Merrill B. (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events (New York: Oxford University Press), 195230.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. (1985/2011) ‘Reply to Quine on Events’. In Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 305–12.Google Scholar
Dowe, Phil. (2010) ‘Proportionality and Omissions’. Analysis, 70, 446–51.Google Scholar
Kaiserman, Alex. (2017) ‘Causes and Counterparts’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95, 1728.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. (1976) ‘Events as Property Exemplifications’. In Brand, Myles and Walton, Douglas (eds.), Action Theory (Dordrecht: Reidel), 159–77.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh. (1974) ‘Volition and Basic Action’. Philosophical Review, 83, 451–73.Google Scholar
McGrath, Sarah. (2005) ‘Causation by Omission: A Dilemma’. Philosophical Studies, 123, 125–48.Google Scholar
Mellor, David H. (2004) ‘For Facts as Causes and Effects’. In Collins, John, Hall, Ned, and Paul, L.A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 309–23.Google Scholar
Payton, Jonathan D. (2018) ‘How to Identify Negative Actions with Positive Events’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96, 87101.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. (1960) Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sartorio, Carolina. (2009) ‘Omissions and Causalism’. Noûs, 43, 513–30.Google Scholar
Sartorio, Carolina. (2010) ‘The Price of Wales Problem for the Counterfactual Theory of Causation’. In Hazlett, Allan (ed.), New Waves in Metaphysics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 250–76.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (2000) ‘Causation by Disconnection’. Philosophy of Science, 67, 285300.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (2005) ‘Contrastive Causation’. Philosophical Review, 114, 327–58.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Joshua. (2014) ‘Causalism an Intentional Omission’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 1526.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. (2003) ‘Causation: Omissions’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66, 81103.Google Scholar
Varzi, Achille. (2007) ‘Omissions and Causal Explanations’. In Castellani, Francesca and Quitterer, Josef (eds.), Agency and Causation in the Human Sciences (Paderborn: Mentis), 155–67.Google Scholar
Vermazen, Bruce. (1985) ‘Negative Acts’. In Vermazen, Bruce and Hintikka, Merrill B. (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events (New York: Oxford University Press), 93104.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik. (1963) Norm and Action: A Logical Inquiry. London: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Zangwill, Nick. (2011) ‘Negative Properties’. Noûs, 45, 528–56.Google Scholar