Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:16:38.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explicit formulae for two-bridge knot polynomials

Part of: Low-dimensional topology Exponential sums and character sums

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Shinji Fukuhara
Shinji Fukuhara
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsTsuda CollegeTsuda-machi 2-1-1 Kodaira-shi Tokyo 187-8577Japan e-mail: fukuhara@tsuda.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A two-bridge knot (or link) can be characterized by the so-called Schubert normal form Kp, q where p and q are positive coprime integers. Associated to Kp, q there are the Conway polynomial ▽kp, q(z) and the normalized Alexander polynomial Δkp, q(t). However, it has been open problem how ▽kp, q(z) and Δkp, q(t) are expressed in terms of p and q. In this note, we will give explicit formulae for the Conway polynomials and the normalized Alexander polynomials in the case of two-bridge knots and links. This is done using elementary number theoretical functions in p and q.

Keywords

two-bridge knotAlexander polynomialConvway polynimial

MSC classification

Secondary: 57M25: Knots and links in $S^3$ 11L03: Trigonometric and exponential sums, general
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 149 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2005

References

[1]Berndt, B. C. and Evans, R. J., ‘On Rademacher's multiplier system for the classical theta-function’, Contemp. Math. 166 (1994), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Birman, J. S., Braids, links, and mapping class groups, Ann. Math. Studies 82 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Burde, G. and Zieschang, H., Knot, Studies in Math. 5 (Walter de Gruyter, 1986).Google Scholar
[4]Crowell, R. H. and Fox, R. H., Introduction to knot theory (Springer, New York, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Filipponi, P. and Horadam, A. F., ‘Derivative sequences of Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials’, in: Applications of Fibonacci numbers, Vol. 4 (ed. Bergum, G. E. et al. ) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991), pp. 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fukuhara, S., ‘Modular forms, generalized Dedekind symbols and period polynomials’, Math. Ann. 310 (1998), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hartley, R. I., ‘On two-bridged knot polynomials’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 28 (1979), 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Kanenobu, T., ‘Alexander polynomials of two-bridge links’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 36 (1984), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kawauchi, A., A survey of knot theory (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1996).Google Scholar
[10]Tuler, R., ‘On the linking number of a 2-bridge link’, Bull. London Math. Soc. 13 (1981), 540–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar