Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:15:48.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mildly distributive semilattices

Part of: Distributive lattices Ordered sets Boolean algebras (Boolean rings)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Robert Hickman
Robert Hickman
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of SydneyN.S.W. 2006, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is no single generalization of distributivity to semilattices. This paper investigates the class of mildly distributive semilattices, which lies between the two most commonly discussed classes in this area—weakly distributive semilattices and distributive semilattices. Particular attention is paid to describing and characterizing congruence distributive mildly distributive semilattices, in contrast to distributive semilattices, whose lattice of join partial congruences is badly behaved and which are difficult to describe.

Keywords

mildly distributiveweakly distributivestrong idealfilterjoin partial congruenceconnected semilattice.

MSC classification

Secondary: 06A12: Semilattices 06D99: None of the above, but in this section
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 1984 , pp. 287 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1984

References

[1]Balbes, R., ‘A representation theory for prime and implicative semilattices,’ Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (1969), 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Blyth, T. S. and Janowitz, M. F., Residuation theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
[3]de Barros, C. M., ‘Filters in partially ordered sets,’ Portugal. Math. 27 (1968), 87–98.Google Scholar
[4]Cornish, W. H. and Hickman, R. C., ‘Weakly distributive semilattices,’ Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 32 (1978), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Dilworth, R. P. and Crawley, P., Algebraic theory nf lattices (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973).Google Scholar
[6]Frank, O., ‘Ideals in partially ordered sets,’ Amer. Math. Monthly 61 (1954), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Grätzer, G., General lattice theory (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel and Stuttgart, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hickman, R. C., ‘Distributivity in semilattices,’ Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 32 (1978), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Hickman, R. C., ‘Congruence extensions for semilattices with distributivity,’ Algebra Universalis 9 (1979), 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hickman, R. C., ‘Join algebras,’ Comm. Algebra, submitted.Google Scholar
[11]Katrinák, T., ‘Pseudokomplementäre Halbverbände,’ Mat. Časopis 18 (1968), 121–143.Google Scholar
[12]Katnnák, T., ‘Die Kennzeichnung der distributiven Pseudokomplementären Halbverbände,’ J. Reine Angew. Math. 241 (1970), 160–179.Google Scholar
[13]Rhodes, J. B., ‘Modular and distributive semilattices,’ Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 201 (1975), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Varlet, J. C., ‘On separation properties in semilattices,’ Semigroup Forum 10 (1975), 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar