Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:48:37.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defining and protecting the pension promise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Roy Goode
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 1993 Jubilee Lecture considered two fundamental questions addressed in the report of the Pension Law Review Committee: when an employee joins an occupational pension scheme, what should the law consider to be the fundamental pension promise; and how should that promise be protected? The factors affecting the employee's expectations are examined in the light of the pension promise, and the conclusion drawn that certain expectations relating to accrued rights should be protected by law, although the employer should be able to control its financial commitments as to future service. The status of surplus, in both an ongoing scheme and in the event of a wind-up, is also considered, and recommendations made as to the use of a surplus if not already dealt with by the scheme rules. The two principal forms of protection for the pension promise which were recommended by the Pension Law Review Committee are discussed; firstly, the introduction of a minimum solvency standard, backed up by tighter rules for the prompt payment of contributions and by enhanced monitoring and reporting requirements for scheme auditors and actuaries; and secondly, the setting up of a statutory compensation fund to cover a deficit in the event of fraud or theft, to be financed by a post-event levy on schemes.

Keywords

CompensationDiscontinuanceExpectationsOccupational PensionsProtectionRightsSolvencySurplus
Type
Other
Information
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries , Volume 121 , Issue 1 , 1994 , pp. 161 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) ‘His’ ralher than ‘his or her’ because in those days women employees were the subject of severe discrimination in terms of type of work, promotion, pay and pension.Google Scholar
(2) Bone, M. et al. Retirement and Retirement Plans. Table 2.5. HMSO.Google Scholar
(3) HMSO (1993). Pension Law Reform: Report of the Pension Law Review Committee. §3.1.3. HMSO, Cm 2342–1. (heareafter cited as HMSO. (1993). Report.)Google Scholar
(4) Atkinson, A. B. & Sutherland, H. (1993). ‘Two Nations in Early Retirement? The Case of Britain’, in Age, Work and Social Security, edited by Atkinson, A. B. & Rein, Martin, 132. Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) HMSO. (1993). Report. §4.2.13 and cases there cited.Google Scholar
(6) Chanter, v Hopkins, (1838). 4 M. & W. 399, per Lord Abinger at p. 404.Google Scholar
(7) Karsales (Harrow) LTD. v Wallis [1956]. 2 All E.R. 866.Google Scholar
(8) Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, s. 3(2)(b). The E.C. Unfair Contract Terms Directive 1993 is broader still.Google Scholar
(9) HMSO. (1993). Report. §§4.2.9–4.2.10, 4.6.13–4.6.15, 4.14.18 et seq.Google Scholar
(10) Graphically illustrated in LRT Pension Fund Trustee Co. LTD. V. Hutt (1993). Pensions Law Reports 227, where the judgment Knox J. states that it was estimated that a reduction of a half per cent in the assumed rate of future dividend growth would bring down the assessed value of the fund by £167 million and the past service surplus from £460 million to £293 million, a reduction of over 35 per cent.Google Scholar
(11) HMSO. (1993). Report. §§4.1.8–4.1.14.Google Scholar
(12) But this is purely for the purpose of calculating the minimum solvency standard. The trustees would still be under a duty to procure the promised final salary benefits on wind-up if the assets were sufficient.Google Scholar
(13) For those who seek a succinct definition of fraud I cannot improve on the celebrated Ambrose Bierce, who after writing his Enlarged Devil's Dictionary disappeared into Mexico some 80 years ago and was never seen again: Fraud The life of commerce, the goal of religion, the bait of courtship and the basis of polilical power.Google Scholar
(14) Bierce defined litigation as a machine you go into as a pig and come out of as a sausage.Google Scholar