Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:50:30.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A preliminary study on the use of acoustic transmitters for tracking juvenile bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in an estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. Moore
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT
G.D. Pickett
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT
D.R. Eaton
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT

Abstract

The suitability of using intra-peritoneally attached miniature 300 kHz acoustic transmitters to study the behaviour of juvenile bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) between 235 and 370 mm in length was assessed. A laboratory study indicated minimal effects on the subsequent survival and behaviour of juvenile bass. A field study carried out indicated the potential use of the transmitter for telemetry studies on juvenile bass.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, J.D. & Rawlings, C.E., 1993. The effect of intragastric transmitters on feeding behaviour of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, parr during autumn. Journal of Fish Biology, 43, 646648.Google Scholar
Arnold, G.P., 1969. A flume for behaviour studies of marine fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 51, 671679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamish, F.W.H., 1978. Swimming capacity. In Fish physiology. Vol. VII. Locomotion (ed. W.S., Hoar and D.J., Randall), pp. 101187. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenstreet, S.P.R. & Morgan, R.I.G., 1989. The effect of ultrasonic tags on the growth rates of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., parr of varying size just prior to smolting. Journal of Fish Biology, 35, 301309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, D.F., 1986. Bass nurseries on the west coast of the UK. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 66, 439464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, D.F., 1988. The importance of estuaries for sea-bass, Dicentrarchus labrax (L.). Journal of Fish Biology, 33, supplement A, 2533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, M.C., 1989. Effects of implanted dummy transmitters on mortality, growth and tissue reaction in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. Journal of Fish Biology, 35, 577587.Google Scholar
McCleave, J.D. & Stred, K. A., 1975. Effect of dummy telemetry transmitters on stamina of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 32, 559563.Google Scholar
McFarlane, G.A. & Beamish, R.J., 1990. Effect of an external tag on growth of sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), and consequences to mortality and age at maturity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47, 15511557.Google Scholar
Mellas, E.J. & Haynes, J.M., 1985. Swimming performance and behavior of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and white perch (Morone americana): effects of attaching telemetry transmitters. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42, 488493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A., Potter, E.C.E. & Buckley, A.A., 1992. The estuarine behaviour of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts. In Proceedings of the Fourth European International Conference on Wildlife Telemetry (ed. I.G., Priede and S.M., Swift), pp. 389399. London: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Moore, A., Russell, I.C. & Potter, E.C.E., 1990b. The effects of intraperitoneally implanted dummy acoustic transmitters on the behaviour and physiology of juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Journal of Fish Biology, 37, 713721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A., Storeton-West, T., Russell, I.C., Potter, E.C.E. & Challis, M.J., 1990a. A technique for tracking Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts through estuaries. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports), CM 1990/M: 18, 5 pp.Google Scholar
Pawson, M.G., Kelley, D.F. & Pickett, G.D., 1987. The distribution and migrations of bass Dicentrarchus labrax L., in waters around England and Wales as shown by tagging. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 67, 183217.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.J., Macqueen, A., Shearer, W.M. & Young, H., 1973a. The histopathology of salmon tagging. I. The tagging lesion in newly tagged parr. Journal of Fish Biology, 5, 497503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R.J., Macqueen, A., Shearer, W.M. & Young, H., 1973b. The histopathology of salmon tagging. III. Secondary infections associated with tagging. Journal of Fish Biology, 5, 621623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, D.J. & Potter, E.C.E., 1988. First results with a new estuarine fish tracking system. Journal of Fish Biology, 33, supplement A, 127132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrenn, W.B. & Hackney, P.A., 1979. Growth and survival of sauger (Stizostedion canadense) with surgically implanted dummy transmitters. Underwater Telemetry Newsletter, 9(2), 912.Google Scholar