Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:41:19.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The discursive chronotopes of waste: Temporal laminations and linguistic hauntings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2022

Crispin Thurlow Open the ORCID record for Crispin Thurlow [Opens in a new window] ,
Alessandro Pellanda  and
Laura Wohlgemuth
Crispin Thurlow*
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
Alessandro Pellanda
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
Laura Wohlgemuth
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
*
Address for correspondence: Crispin Thurlow, Department of English, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 49, 3012 Bern, Switzerland crispin.thurlow@ens.unibe.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents two case-study examples of the discursive chronotopes by which domestic waste is organized as a linguistic, spatial, and temporal configuration. Marked by their liminality and temporal laminations, curbside garbage collection and secondhand/thrift shops are major sociomaterial practices in Switzerland. The three discursive chronotopes we address in these contexts are those concerned with regulation, repression, and (re)valuation. By focusing on the temporalities of waste, we complicate how linguistic landscape research typically conceives of, and approaches, both space and language. The language of waste is not always visible or even expressed. Indeed, waste is often deliberately rendered invisible—under the cover of darkness, behind closed doors, sent elsewhere—and thereby functions as an act of discursive suppression. For these reasons, we endorse a hauntological approach to linguistic landscapes. (Waste, linguistic landscape, discursive chronotope, temporal lamination, hauntology)*

Type
Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 51 , Special Issue 5: Semiotic Timescapes , November 2022 , pp. 819 - 837
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

In the first instance, this article arises as part of Thurlow's larger ‘Articulating Privilege’ project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (|CRSK-1_190183). In Autumn 2020, Pellanda and Wohlgemuth took Thurlow's MA seminar on ‘Language and Waste’, which was partly underwritten with funding from the University of Bern's ‘Promoting Sustainable Development in Teaching’ scheme; this is when the three of us first started thinking together through the kinds of issues and ideas at the heart of the current article. We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their encouragement and advice, and the production team at Nova Techset for also helping to bring the paper to life.

References

Adam, Barbara (2002). Perceptions of time. In Ingold, Tim (ed.), Companion encyclopedia of anthropology: Humanity, culture and social life, 2nd edn., 503–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007). Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication 27:320–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Catherine, & O'Hare, Patrick (2020). Waste and its disguises: Technologies of (un)knowing. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology. doi: 10.1080/00141844.2020.1796734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allon, Fiona; Barcan, Ruth; & Eddison-Cogan, Karma (2021). Out of joint: The time of waste. In Allon, Fiona, Barcan, Ruth, & Eddison-Cogan, Karma (eds.), The temporalities of waste: Out of sight, out of time, 1–17. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Appelgren, Staffan, & Bohlin, Anna (2015a). Introduction: Circulating stuff on second-hand, vintage and retro markets. Culture Unbound 7:3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelgren, Staffan, & Bohlin, Anna (2015b). Growing in motion: The circulation of used things on second-hand markets. Culture Unbound 7:143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, Peter (2005). Signs of multilingualism in Tokyo: A diachronic look at the linguistic landscape. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 175/176:103–21.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Ed. by Holquist, Michael. Trans. by Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baro, Giles (2019). Chronoscape of authenticity: Consumption and aspiration in a middle-class market in Johannesburg. In Peck, Amiena, Stroud, Christopher, & Williams, Quentin (eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes, 49–69. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean (2007). Why hasn't everything disappeared already? London: Seagull.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael (1997). The dialogic unconscious: Psychoanalysis, discursive psychology and the nature of repression. British Journal of Social Psychology 36:139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boag, Simon (2010). Repression, suppression, and conscious awareness. Psychoanalytic Psychology 27(2):164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, Zannie, & Stroud, Christopher (2019). Zombie landscapes: Apartheid traces in the discourses of young South Africans. In Peck, Amiena, Stroud, Christopher, & Williams, Quentin (eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes, 11–28. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, Jillian R. (2022). Trash talk: Language as waste practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 26(3):404–10. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crang, Mike (2001). Rhythms of the city: Temporalised space and motion. In May & Thrift, 187–225.Google Scholar
Cross, Gary (2017). Consumed nostalgia: Memory in the age of fast capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jaques (1993/2006). Spectres of Marx. The state of debt, the work of mourning, and the new international. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana (2018). What about ghosts? Towards a sociolinguistics of the spectre. Diggit Magazine. Online: https://www.diggitmagazine.com/column/sociolinguistics-spectre.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana (2022). The sound of absent-presence: Towards formulating a sociolinguistics of the spectre. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 45(2):135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doeland, Lisa (2020). Turning to the spectre of waste: A hauntological approach. In Ek, Richard & Johansson, Nils (eds.), Perspectives on waste from the social sciences and humanities: Opening the bin, 22–37. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Dong, Jie (2021). ‘Labor is the most glorious’: Chronotopic linguistic landscaping and the making of working class identities. Language & Communication 80:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary (1966/2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, David (2014). Food waste: Home consumption, material culture and everyday life. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendelman, Irina, & Aiello, Giorgia (2010). Faces of places: Façades as global communication in post-Eastern bloc urban renewal. In Jaworski, Adam & Thurlow, Crispin (eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space, 256–73. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth (2001). Architecture from the outside: Essays on virtual and real space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guinto, Nicanor (2019). The place/s of Tagalog in Hong Kong's central district: Negotiating center-periphery dynamics. Linguistic Landscape 5(2):160–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guissemo, Manuel (2019). Orders of (in)visibility: Colonial and postcolonial chronotopes in linguistic landscapes of memorization in Maputo. In Peck, Amiena, Stroud, Christopher, & Williams, Quentin (eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes, 29–48. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Gay (2006). The ethics of waste: How we relate to rubbish. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Kevin (2004). Secondhandedness: Consumption, disposal, and absent presence. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22(1):157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hird, Myra J. (2012). Knowing waste: Towards an inhuman epistemology. Social Epistemology 26(3–4):453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim (2007). Lines: A brief history. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, & Wei, Li (2021). Introducing writing (in) the city. Social Semiotics 31(1):1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffermans, Kasper (2019). Micro-landscapes and the double semiotic horizon of mobility in the Global South. In Peck, Amiena, Stroud, Christopher, & Williams, Quentin (eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes, 201–222. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Karlander, David (2019). A semiotics of nonexistence? Erasure and erased writing under anti-graffiti regimes. Linguistic Landscape 5(2):198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopytoff, Igor (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In Appuadurai, Arjun (ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosatica, Maida (2021). Sarajevo's war childhood museum: A social semiotic analysis of ‘combi-memorials’ as spatial texts. In Blackwood, Robert & Macalister, John (eds.), Multilingual memories: Monuments, museums and the linguistic landscape, 161–89. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri (1974/1991). The production of space. Trans. by Nicholson-Smith, Donald. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lovatt, Melanie (2015). Charity shops and the imagined future of objects. Culture Unbound 7:13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Kate, & Karimzad, Farzad (2019). Chronotopeography: Nostalgia and modernity in South Delhi's linguistic landscape. Sociolinguistic Studies 13(1):83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Jon, & Thrift, Nigel (eds.) (2001). Timespace: Geographies of temporality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M., & Levin, Erez (2019). Israel as homotopia: Language, space, and vicious belonging. Language in Society 48:607–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Daniel (2006). Consumption. In Tilley, Chris, Keane, Webb, Küchler, Susanne, Rowlands, Mike, & Spyer, Patricia (eds.), Handbook of material culture, 341–54. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mpendukana, Sibonile, & Stroud, Christopher (2019). Of monkeys, shacks and loos: Changing times, changing places. In Peck, Amiena, Stroud, Christopher, & Williams, Quentin (eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes, 183–200. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Navaro-Yashin, Yael (2009). Affective spaces, melancholic objects: Ruination and the production of anthropological knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowotny, Helga (1996). Time: The modern and postmodern experience. Trans. by Plaice, Neville. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Pellanda, Alessandro (2021). Recycling privilege: The social semiotics of waste and class in Switzerland. Bern: University of Bern MA thesis.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari (2014). Spatial interaction in Sámiland: Regulative and transitory chronotopes in the dynamic multilingual landscape of an indigenous Sámi village. International Journal of Bilingualism 18(5):478–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlan, John (2005). On garbage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron (2007). Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemiotization. In Bhatia, Vijay, Flowerdew, John, & Jones, Rodney (eds.), Advances in discourse studies, 233–44. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smethurst, Paul (2000). The postmodern chronotope: Reading space and time in contemporary fiction. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanes, Elyse T. (2021). Lingering matter: Materialities, temporalities and waste in clothes. In Allon, Fiona, Barcan, Ruth, & Eddison-Cogan, Karma (eds.), The temporalities of waste: Out of sight, out of time, 122–35. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Straw, Will (2010). Spectacles of waste. In Boutros, Alexandra & Straw, Will (eds.), Circulation and the city: Essays on urban culture, 184–213. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Tam, Daisy (2020). Open crowd: Just-in-time food rescue. In Allon, Fiona, Barcan, Ruth, & Eddison-Cogan, Karma (eds.), The temporalities of waste: Out of sight, out of time, 36–46. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin (2019). Semiotic creativities in and with space: Binaries and boundaries, beware! International Journal of Multilingualism 16(4):94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin (2022). Rubbish? Envisioning a sociolinguistics of waste. Journal of Sociolinguistics 26(3): 386–403. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, & Moshin, Jamie (2018). What the f#@$! Policing and performing the unmentionable in the news. In Shröter, Melani & Taylor, Charlotte (eds.), Exploring silence and absence in discourse: Empirical approaches, 305–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinch, Shonna, & Snajdr, Edward (2017). What the signs say: Gentrification and the disappearance of capitalism without distinction in Brooklyn. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(1):64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufi, Stefania (2017). Liminality, heterotopic sites, and the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape 3(1):78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Filipa M. (2010). The aesthetics of place-temporality in everyday urban space: The case of Fitzroy Square. In Edensor, Tim (ed.), Geographies of rhythm: Nature, place, mobilities and bodies, 45–56. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar