Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:41:45.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

El Comercio Clasico de Obsidiana: Rutas Entre Tierras Altas y Tierras Bajas en el Area Maya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

M. Charlotte Arnauld
M. Charlotte Arnauld*
Affiliation:
CNRS, UPR 312, 22 rue Pargaminières, 31000 Toulouse, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Resumen

Aunque las tres fuentes principales de obsidiana se encuentran ubicadas en las tierras altas, los modelos propuestos hasta la fecha para reconstruir la distribución de este material en las tierras bajas no suelen tomar en consideración los factores sociopolíticos e históricos que han afectado las entidades mayas de tierras altas. Sin embargo, estos factores son determinantes de los sistemas comerciales a larga distancia. Al examinar y comparar la ruta por tierra de Alta Verapaz y la ruta fluvial–marítima del Motagua–Caribe en una perspectiva geográfica, sociopolítica, e histórica que integra los grandes centros de Kaminaljuyú y de Quiriguá, así como los centros de Verapaz, se concluye que la segunda ruta fue sin duda más activa que la primera en el comercio de obsidiana, entre otros bienes. Pero, la complejidad de las secuencias históricas de estos centros y la variabilidad de sus estructuras sociopolíticas sugieren que la competencia entre las dos rutas fue intensa y provocó cierta inestabilidad en los sistemas comerciales y flujos de obsidiana, por una y otra ruta.

Abstract

Abstract

Although the three major obsidian sources of the Maya are located in the Maya Highlands, most trade models proposed so far for obsidian distribution in the lowlands do not consider the sociopolitical and historical factors that affected highland polities, and hence, long-distance trade systems. One approach to this broad question is to study and compare the major trade routes between the highlands and the lowlands, i. e., the Alta Verapaz (land) route and the Motagua–Caribe (sea) route, from geographic, sociopolitical, and historical points of view. Available data on the social structure and culture history of Kaminaljuyu and Quirigua–prominent centers located close to the obsidian sources-as well as of Verapaz centers, are tentatively reexamined and reevaluated in the context of the highland-lowland Classic obsidian trade. This allows us to assess the effective supremacy of the Motagua—Caribe route over the Alta Verapaz route, at least during those (Classic) periods when Kaminaljuyu and Teotihuacan, then Quirigua, may have controlled long-distance obsidian trade. It appears that sociopolitical and historical factors resulted in a degree of instability in the Classic trade systems, as both routes competed for larger quantities of obsidian to be extracted, processed, and transported through systems that differed in time and space. Against such a complex background, quantitative data on obsidian distribution in either the lowlands or the highlands will have limited predictive potential unless more precision is attained in the control of chronological and functional contexts of obsidian samples when they are analyzed for source provenience. Such a goal requires that specific data-recovery strategies be implemented, which should give priority to sociopolitical and historical factors and include both Maya Highland and Lowland subareas.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 347 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Referencias Citadas

Adams, R. E. W. 1971 The Ceramics of Altar de Sacrificios. Papers of the Peabody Museum Vol. 63, No. 1. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Adams, R. E. W. 1973 Maya Collapse: Transformation and Termination in the Ceramic Sequence at Altar de Sacrificios. En The Classic Maya Collapse, editado por T. P. Culbert, pp. 133–163. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Adams, R. E. W. 1978 Routes of Communication in Mesoamerica: The Northern Guatemalan Highlands and the Peten. En Mesoamerican Communication Routes and Cultural Contacts, editado por T. A. Lee y C. Navarrete, pp. 27–36. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation No. 40. Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Adams, R. Mc. 1974 Current Strategies in the Archaeological Study of Trade. Current Anthropology 15:239–258.Google Scholar
Andrews, A. P., y Robles C., F. 1985 Chichen Itza and Coba: An Itza–Maya Standoff in Early Postclassic Yucatan. En The Lowland Maya Postclassic, editado por A. F. Chase y P. M. Rice, pp. 62–72. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Andrews, A. P., Asaro, F., Michel, H. V., Stross, F. H., y Cervera Rivero, P. 1989 The Obsidian Trade at Isla Cerritos, Yucatán, México. Journal of Field Archaeology 16:355–363.Google Scholar
Arnauld, M. C. 1981 The Late Classic Exchange System Between the Maya Highlands and Lowlands: A View from Aha Verapaz, Guatemala. Ms. En posesión del autor.Google Scholar
Arnauld, M. C. 1986 Archéologie de l’habitat en Alta Verapaz (Guatemala). Collection Etudes Mésoaméricaines No. 10. Centre d’Etudes Mexicaines et Centraméricaines, México.Google Scholar
Ashmore, W. 1984 Quirigua Archaeology and History Revisited. Journal of Field Archaeology 11:365–386.Google Scholar
Ashmore, W., Schortman, E. M., y Sharer, R. J. 1983 The Quirigua Project: 1979 Season. En Quirigua Reports, vol. II, editado por E. M. Schortman y P. A. Urban, pp. 5–78, University Museum Monograph 49. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Brown, K. L. 1977 The Valley of Guatemala: A Highland Port of Trade. En Teotihuacan and Kaminaljuyu, editado por W. T. Sanders y J. W. Michels, pp. 205–396. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Brown, K. L. 1985 Postclassic Relationships Between the Highland and Lowland Maya. In The Lowland Maya Postclassic, editado por A. F. Chase y P. M. Rice, pp. 270–282. University of Texas Press, Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheek, C. D. 1977 Teotihuacan Influence at Kaminaljuyu. En Teotihuacan and Kaminaljuyu, editado por W. T. Sanders y J. W. Michels, pp. 441–452. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Clancy, F. S. 1988 The Compositions and Contexts of the Classic Stelae at Copán and Quiriguá. En The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, editado por E. H. Boone y G. R. Willey, pp. 195–222. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Coggins, C. C. 1979 Teotihuacan at Tikal in the Early Classic Period. Actes du XLII Congrès International des Américanistes 8:251–270. Paris.Google Scholar
Coggins, C. C. 1988 On the Historical Significance of Decorated Ceramics at Copan and Quirigua and Related Classic Maya Sites. En The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, editado por E. H. Boone y G. R. Willey, pp. 95–124. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Demarest, A. A. 1988 Political Evolution in the Maya Borderlands: The Salvadoran Frontier. En The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, editado por E. H. Boone y G. R. Willey, pp. 335–394. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Dillon, B. D. 1978 A Tenth Cycle Sculpture from Aha Verapaz, Guatemala. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 36:39–46. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Dreiss, M. L. 1988 Obsidian at Colha, Belize: A Technological Analysis and Distributional Study Based on Trace Element Data. Papers of the Colha Project, vol. 4. Texas Archeological Research Laboratory, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Dreiss, M. L., y Brown, D. O. 1989 Obsidian Exchange Patterns in Belize. En Prehistoric Maya Economies of Belize, editado por P. A. McAnany y B. L. Isaac, pp. 57–90. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. H. 1985 A Tumpline Economy. Labyrinthos, Culver City, California.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1968 The Olmec and the Valley of Oaxaca: A Model for Inter-Regional Interaction in Formative Times. En Dumbarton Oaks Conference on the Olmec, editado por E. P. Benson, pp. 77–110. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Fowler, W. R. Jr., Kelley, J. H., Asaro, F., Michel, H. V., y Stress, F. H. 1987 The Chipped Stone Industry of Cihuatan and Santa María, El Salvador, and Sources of Obsidian from Cihuatan. American Antiquity 52:151–160.Google Scholar
Fox, J. 1978 Quiche Conquest. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Freidel, D. A. 1986 Terminal Classic Lowland Maya: Successes, Failure and Aftermaths. En Late Lowland Maya Civilization, Classic to Postclassic, editado por J. A. Sabloffy E. W. Andrews V, pp. 409–432. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Gage, T. 1979 Nueva relación que contiene los viajes de Tomas Gage en la Nueva España. Editorial Jose de Pineda Ibarra, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Graham, J. A., Hester, T. R., y Jack, R. N. 1972 Sources of the Obsidian at the Ruins of Seibal, Peten, Guatemala. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 16:111–116. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Guderjan, T. H., Garber, J. F., Smith, H. A., Stress, F., Michel, H. V., y Asaro, F. 1989 Maya Maritime Trade and Sources of Obsidian at San Juan, Ambergris Cay, Belize. Journal of Field Archaeology 16:363–369.Google Scholar
Haefkens, J. 1969 Viaje a Guatemala y Centroamerica. Sociedad de Geografia e Historia, Serie Viajeros, vol. 1. Editorial Universitaria, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1972 Obsidian Trade Routes in the Mayan Area. Science 78:1092–1093.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1975 Lubaantum, a Classic Maya Realm. Monographs of the Peabody Museum No. 2. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1976 Maya Obsidian Trade in Southern Belize. En Maya Lithic Studies: Papers from the 1976 Belize Field Symposium, editado por T. R. Hester y N. Hammond, pp. 71–82. Special Report No. 4. Center for Archaeological Research. University of Texas, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1978 Cacao and Cobaneros: An Overland Trade Route Between the Maya Highlands and Lowlands. En Mesoamerican Communication Routes and Cultural Contacts, editado por T. A. Lee y C. Navarrete, pp. 19–26. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation No. 40. Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1982 Ancient Maya Civilization. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Hammond, N., Neivens, M. D., y Harbottle, G. 1984 Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from a Classic Maya Residential Group at Nohmul, Belize. American Antiquity 49:815–820.Google Scholar
Healy, P. F., McKillop, H. I., y Walsh, B. 1984 Analysis of Obsidian from Moho Cay, Belize: New Evidence on Classic Maya Trade Routes. Science 225:414–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirth, K. G. 1988 Beyond the Maya Frontier: Cultural Interaction and Syncretism Along the Central Honduran Corridor. En The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, editado por E. H. Boone y G. R. Willey, pp. 297–334. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Hoopes, J. W. 1985 Trade and Exchange. En A Consideration of the Early Classic Period in the Maya Lowlands, editado por G. R. Willey y P. Mathews, pp. 145–160. Publication No. 10. Institute of Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York, Albany.Google Scholar
Hurtado de Mendoza, L. 1973 Neutron Activation Analysis of Kaminaljuyu Obsidian. En The Pennsylvania State University Kaminaljuyu Project—1969; 1970 Seasons: Part One—Mound Excavations, editado por J. F. Michels y W. T. Sanders, pp. 43–54. Occasional Papers In Anthropology No. 9. Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Hurtado de Mendoza, L. 1977 Obsidian Studies and the Archaeology of the Valley of Guatemala. Tesis Doctoral sin publicar, Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Hurtado de Mendoza, L., y Jester, W. A. 1978 Obsidian Sources in Guatemala: A Regional Approach. American Antiquity 43:424–435.Google Scholar
Ichon, A. 1988 Le peuplement préhispanique. En Archéologie de sauvetage 6. La vallée moyenne du Rio Chixoy (Guatemala), occupation préhispanique et problèmes actuels, A. Ichon, D. Douzant-Roxenfeld y P. Usselmann, pp. 53–194. CNRS-RCP 500, Institut d’Ethnologie, Editorial Piedra Santa, Paris y Guatemala.Google Scholar
Ichon, A., y Arnauld, M. C. 1985 Le protoclassique à La Lagunita, El Quiché, Guatemala. CNRS-RCP 294 et 500. Institut d’Ethnologie, Editorial Piedra Santa, Paris y Guatemala.Google Scholar
Ichon, A., y Hatch, M. P. 1982 Archéologie de sauvetage dans la vallée du Rio Chixoy 4—Los Encuentros. CNRS-RCP 500. Institut d’Ethnologie, Editorial Piedra Santa, Paris y Guatemala.Google Scholar
Ichon, A., Fauvet-Berthelot, M. F., Plocieniak, C., Hill, R. II, Gonzalez Lauck, R., y Bailey, M. A. 1980 Archéologie de sauvetage dans la vallée du Rio Chixoy 2—Cauinal. CNRS-RCP 500. Institut d’Ethnologie, Editorial Piedra Santa, Paris y Guatemala.Google Scholar
Jones, C., y Sharer, R. J. 1986 Archaeological Investigations in the Site Core of Quirigua, Guatemala. En The Southeast Maya Periphery, editado por P. A. Urban y E. M. Schortman, pp. 27–34. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
McAnany, P. A. 1989 Stone-Tool Production and Exchange in the Eastern Maya Lowlands: The Consumer Perspective from Pulltrouser Swamp, Belize. American Antiquity 54:332–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKillop, H. I. 1989 Coastal Maya Trade: Obsidian Densities at Wild Cane Cay. En Prehistoric Maya Economies of Belize, editado por P. A. McAnany y B. L. Isaac, pp. 17–56. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. J., Kepecs, S. M., Walters, G. R., y May, E. M. 1989 Coastal Trade and Procurement Sites in Southern Belize: Implications for Yucatecan Salt Production and Circum-Peninsular Trade. Memorias del II Coloquio International de Mayistas 1:703–716. Campeche.Google Scholar
McVicker, D. E. 1978 Prehispanic Trade in Central Chiapas, Mexico. En Mesoamerican Communication Routes and Cultural Contacts, editado por T. A. Lee y C. Navarrete, pp. 177–186. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation No. 40. Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Michels, J. W. 1976 Some Sociological Observations on Obsidian Production at Kaminaljuyu, Guatemala. En Maya Lithic Studies: Papers from the 1976 Belize Field Symposium, editado por T. R. Hester y N. Hammond, pp. 109–118. Special Report No. 4. Center for Archaeological Research. University of Texas, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Miles, S. W. 1957 The Sixteenth-Century Pokom Maya. A Documentary Analysis of Social Structure and Archaeological Setting. Transactions of the Philosophical Society (n.s.) 47(4):731–781. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Miller, A. G. 1983 Stylistic Implications of Monument Carving at Quirigua and Copan. En Quirigua Reports: II Papers 6-15, editado por E. M. Schortman y P. A. Urban, pp. 129–136. University Museum Monograph No. 49. The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Miller, A. G. 1985 From the Maya Margins: Images of Postclassic Power Politics. En Late Lowland Maya Civilization. Classic to Postclassic, editado por J. A. Sabloff y E. W. Andrews V, pp. 199é222. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Miller, A. G. (editor) 1983 Highland-Lowland Interaction in Mesoamerica: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Miller, M. E. 1988 The Meaning and Function of the Main Acropolis, Copán. En The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, editado por E. H. Boone y G. R. Willey, pp. 149–194. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Millon, R. 1988 The Last Years of Teotihuacan Dominance. En The Collapse and Ancient States and Civilizations, editado por N. Yoffee y G. L. Cowgill, pp. 102–164. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, H. 1976 Spatial Distribution of Flint and Obsidian Artifacts at Tikal, Guatemala. En Maya Lithic Studies: Papers from the 1976 Belize Field Symposium, editado por T. R. Hester y N. Hammond, pp. 91–108. Special Report No. 4. Center for Archaeological Research. University of Texas, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, H., Asaro, F., y Stress, F. 1984 Tikal Obsidian Sources and Typology. American Antiquity 49:104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, F. W., Nielson, K. K., Mangelson, N. F., Hill, M. W., y Matheny, R. T. 1977 Preliminary Studies of the Trace Element Composition of Obsidian Artifacts from Northern Campeche, Mexico. American Antiquity 42:209–225.Google Scholar
Nelson, F. W., Sidrys, R. V., y Holmes, R. D. 1978 Trace-Element Analysis by X-Ray Fluorescence of Obsidian Artifacts from Guatemala and Belize. En Excavations at Seibal, Department of Peten, Guatemala—Artifacts, editado por G. R. Willey, pp. 153–161. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 14. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nelson, F. W., Phillips, D. A., y Barrera Rubio, A. 1983 Trade Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from the Northern Maya Lowlands. En Investigations at Edzna, Campeche, Mexico, vol. 2, editado por R. Matheny, pp. 204–239. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation No. 46. Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Pendergast, D. M. 1985 Stability Through Change: Lamanai, Belize, from the Ninth to the Seventeenth Century. En Late Lowland Maya Civilization. Classic to Postclassic, editado por J. A. Sabloff y E. W. Andrews V, pp. 223–250. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Price, B. J. 1978 Commerce and Cultural Process in Mesoamerica. En Mesoamerican Communication Routes and Cultural Contacts, editado por T. A. Lee y C. Navarrete, pp. 231–245. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation No. 40. Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Rathje, W. L. 1971 The Origin and Development of Lowland Classic Maya Civilization. American Antiquity 36:275–285.Google Scholar
Rathje, W. L., Gregory, D. A., y Wiseman, F. M. 1978 Trade Models and Archaeological Problems: Classic Maya Examples. En Mesoamerican Communication Routes and Cultural Contacts, editado por T. A. Lee y C. Navarrete, pp. 147–176. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation No. 40. Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Reise, B. 1988 Epigraphy of the Southeast Zone in Relation to Other Parts of Mesoamerica. En The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, editado por E. H. Boone y G. R. Willey, pp. 67–94. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1975 Trade as Action at a Distance: Questions of Integration and Communication. En Ancient Civilization and Trade, editado por J. A. Sabloff y C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, pp. 3–59. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Rice, D. S. 1985 The Peten Postclassic: A Settlement Perspective. En Late Lowland Maya Civilization, Classic to Postclassic, editado por J. A. Sabloff y E. W. Andrews V, pp. 301–346. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1984 Obsidian Procurement in the Central Peten Lakes Region, Guatemala. Journal of Field Archaeology 112:181–194.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M., Michel, H. V., Asaro, F., y Stress, F. 1985 Provenience Analysis of Obsidians from the Central Peten Lake Region. Guatemala. American Antiquity 50:591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabloff, J. A. 1973 Continuity and Disruption During Terminal Late Classic Times at Seibal, Ceramic and Other Evidence. In The Classic Maya Collapse, editado por T. P. Culbert, pp. 107–132. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Sabloff, J. A., y Rathje, W. L. 1975 The Rise of a Maya Merchant Class. Scientific American 233:72–82.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T. 1977 Ethnographic Analogy and the Teotihuacan Horizon Style. En Teotihuacan and Kaminaljuyu, editado por W. T. Sanders y J. W. Michels, pp. 397–410. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S. 1983 Obsidian Trade and Teotihuacan Influence in Mesoamerica. En Highland–Lowland Interaction in Mesoamerica: Interdisciplinary Approaches, editado por A. G. Miller, pp. 69–124. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Sapper, K. 1985 The Verapaz in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: A Contribution to the Historical Geography and Ethnography of Northeastern Guatemala. Traducido por T. E. Gutman. Occasional Paper No. 13. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Scholes, F. V., y Roys, R. L. 1948 The Maya Chontal Indians of Acalan–Tixchel, A Contribution to the History and Ethnography of the Yucatan Peninsula. Publication No. 560. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Sharer, R. J. 1978 Archaeology and History at Quirigua, Guatemala. Journal of Field Archaeology 5:51–70.Google Scholar
Sharer, R. J. 1982 Sucesos terminates en las tierras bajas del sureste: Perspectiva desde Quirigua. Mesoamerica 3:356–364.Google Scholar
Sharer, R. J. 1988 Quirigua as a Classic Maya Center. En The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, editado por E. H. Boone y G. R. Willey, pp. 31–66. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Sheets, P. D. 1983 Guatemalan Obsidian: A Preliminary Study of Sources and Quirigua Artifacts. En Quirigua Reports: II: Papers 6-15, editado por E. M. Schortman y P. A. Urban, pp. 87–101. Monograph No. 49. The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Sheets, P. D. 1986 Natural Hazards, Natural Disasters, and Research in the Zapotitlan Valley of El Salvador. En The Southeast Maya Periphery, editado por P. A. Urban y E. M. Schortman, pp. 224–238. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Sidrys, R. V. 1976 Classic Maya Obsidian Trade. American Antiquity 41:449–464.Google Scholar
Sidrys, R. V. 1977 Mass-Distance Measures for the Maya Obsidian Trade. En Exchange Systems in Prehistory, editado por T. K. Earle y J. E. Ericson, pp. 91–108. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sidrys, R. V. 1979 Supply and Demand Among the Classic Maya. Current Anthropology 20:594–597.Google Scholar
Sidrys, R. V., y Kimberlin, J. 1979 Use of Mayan Obsidian Sources Through Time: Trace-Element Data from El Balsamo, Guatemala, Journal of Field Archaeology 6:116–122.Google Scholar
Smith, A. L., y Kidder, A. V. 1943 Explorations in the Motagua Valley, Guatemala. Publication No. 546, Contribution No. 41. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Stross, F. H., Sheets, P., Asaro, F., y Michel, H. V. 1983 Precise Characterization of Guatemalan Obsidian Sources, and Source Determination of Artifacts from Quirigua. American Antiquity 48:323–346.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. E. S. 1964 Trade Relations Between the Maya Highlands and Lowlands. Estudios de Cultura Maya 4:13–50.Google Scholar
Stross, F. H., Sheets, P., Asaro, F., y Michel, H. V. 1970 Maya History and Religion. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Urban, P. A., y Schortman, E. M. 1988 The Southeast Zone Viewed from the East: Lower Motagua–Naco Valleys. En The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, editado por E. H. Boone y G. R. Willey, pp. 223–268. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Villiers-Fisher, K. 1979 Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts. Ms. En el archivo, Department of Geology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Walters, G. R. 1980 The San Agustin Acasaguastlan Archaeological Project: Report on the 1980 Field Season. 1979–1980 Annual Report 7:73–119. Museum of Anthropology, University of Missouri–Columbia.Google Scholar
Wauchope, R. 1948 Excavations at Zacualpa, Guatemala. Publication No. 14. Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, R. N. 1982 Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Interregional Commodity Distribution: Political Variables and Prehistoric Obsidian Procurement in Mesoamerica. American Antiquity 47:260–275.Google Scholar