Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:33:19.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Class Jurisprudes: Free Labor Ideology and For-Profit Penal Labor in Gilded Age Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

For-profit penal servitude flourished in Gilded Age America. Prisoners produced consumer goods inside factory-penitentiaries for private enterprise. Regulations protecting free labor encountered litigation by businesses invested in carceral capitalism. Judges who defended “liberty of contract,” maintained “state neutrality,” and condemned “class legislation” exhibited a different approach when evaluating labeling laws. Such statutes were seemingly consonant with the free labor ideology that dominated appellate benches—they remediated markets distorted by state-created privileges. Yet courts routinely struck them down. This article argues that judges were motivated by a class-infused framework structuring interpretation of facts and aliening lower-class Americans. Judges perceived workingmen who sought remedial assistance as seeking class legislation; they saw prison inmates and products as ordinary workers and goods, not as captive manpower and state-subsidized wares. Jurisprudence bent and bowed from judges’ values and associations. This article thus reintroduces the explanatory power of class to the Lochner era through judicial subjectivity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adler, Jeffery. 1994. The Dynamite, Wreckage, and Scum in Our Cities: The Social Construction of Deviance in Industrial America. Justice Quarterly 11 (1): 3349.Google Scholar
Alden, Chester, and Melvin Williams, E. 1925. Courts and Lawyers of New York: A History, 1609–1925. New York: American History Society.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. 1894. Report of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association. Philadelphia, PA: Dando Printing and Publishing Company.Google Scholar
American Law Review. 1905. Elective Judiciary a Menace. American Law Review 39: 598–99.Google Scholar
Augst, Thomas. 2003. The Clerk's Tale: Young Men and Moral Life in Nineteenth-Century America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Batlan, Felice. 2002. A Reevaluation of the New York Court of Appeals: The Home, the Market, and Labor, 1885–1905. Law & Social Inquiry 27 (23): 489528.Google Scholar
Beckert, Sven. 2001. The Monied Metropolis: New York City and the Consolidation of the American Bourgeoisie, 1850–1896. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benedict, Michael Les. 1985. Laissez-Faire and Liberty: A Re-Evaluation of the Meaning and Origins of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism. Law and History Review 3 (2): 293331.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. 2000. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, David. 2003. Lochner's Legacy's Legacy. Texas Law Review 82 (1): 164.Google Scholar
Bernstein, David. 2011. Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights Against Progressive Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bingham, Theodore. 1908. Foreign Criminals in New York. North American Review 188:383–94.Google Scholar
Bishop, Joel. 1882. Commentaries on the Criminal Law, Volume I, 7th ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. What Makes a Social Class? On the Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32:118.Google Scholar
Bricklayer, Mason and Plasterer. 1911. The Bricklayer, Mason and Plasterer, 16 (6).Google Scholar
Brief for Appellants. 1910. In Record on Appeal, People ex rel. Phillips v. Raynes. Albany: J. B. Lyon Company State Printers.Google Scholar
Brooklyn Daily Eagle. 1903. Judge O'Brien Nominated. Brooklyn Daily Eagle, September 6.Google Scholar
Bureau of Immigration. 1913. Report of Commissioner General of Immigration. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Cachán, Manuel. 2002. Justice Stephen Field and “Free Soil, Free Labor Constitutionalism”: Reconsidering Revisionism. Law and History Review 20 (3): 541–76.Google Scholar
Cambridge Chronicle. 1922. Death of Judge John Wilkes Hammond—Cambridge Resident Over 50 Years. Cambridge Chronicle, April 1, p. 9.Google Scholar
Coates, John IV. 2015. Corporate Speech and the First Amendment: History, Data, and Implications. Constitutional Commentary 30 (2): 223–76.Google Scholar
Columbia Law Review. 1935. Validity of Federally Enabled State Regulation of Commerce in Convict-Made Goods. Partial Invalidity. Columbia Law Review 35 (5): 778–80.Google Scholar
Commercial and Financial Chronicle. 1887. Laws “To Protect Labor.” Commercial and Financial Chronicle 45 (1,156): 227–28.Google Scholar
Currarino, Rosanne. 2010. The Labor Question in America: Economic Democracy in the Gilded Age. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry. 1998. Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry. 2000. Formalism and Realism in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence. University of Chicago Law Review 67 (4): 10891150.Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry. 2005. Some Varieties and Vicissitudes of Lochnerism. Boston University Law Review 85 (3): 8811000.Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry. 2012. Carolene Products and Constitutional Structure. Supreme Court Review 2012:321–78.Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry. 2013. Ambiguities of Free Labor Revisited: The Convict-Labor Question in Progressive-Era New York. In Making Legal History: A Festschrift in Honor of William E. Nelson, ed. Hulsebosch, Daniel J. and Bernstein, R. B., 116–39. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry. 2014. The Jurisprudence of the Hughes Court: The Recent Literature. Notre Dame Law Review 89 (5): 19292028.Google Scholar
Deposition of Charles Whelan, Exhibit B, Information. 1910. In Record on Appeal, People ex rel. Phillips v. Raynes. Albany: J. B. Lyon Company State Printers.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel. 1995. Lawyers Against Labor: From Individual Rights to Corporate Liberalism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen. 1993. History of the Supreme Court of the United States: Troubled Beginnings of the Modern State, 1888–1910, Volume 8. New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. 1970. Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forbath, William. 1985. The Ambiguities of Free Labor: Labor and the Law in the Gilded Age. Wisconsin Law Review 1985 (4): 767818.Google Scholar
Forbath, William. 1991. Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, James Jr. 1999. Citizenship, Poverty, and Federalism. University of Pittsburg Law Review 60 (2): 421578.Google Scholar
Gildemeister, Glen. 1987. Prison Labor and Convict Competition with Free Workers in Industrializing America, 1840–1890. New York, Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Gilkey, Elliott, and Taylor, William. 1901. The Ohio Hundred Year Book. Columbus, OH: Fred J. Heer, State Printer.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, J. A. C. 1938. Interstate Traffic in Convict-Made Goods. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 28 (6): 854–60.Google Scholar
Greenburg, Brian. 1985. Worker and Community: Response to Industrialization in a Nineteenth-Century American City, Albany, New York, 1850–1884. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review. 1931. Statutes Restricting the Sale of Convict-Made Goods. Harvard Law Review 44 (5): 846–54.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Samuel. 1883. Letters Patent No. 277,899. May 22.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
House of Representatives. 1922. Convict Labor—Hearings Before the House Committee on Labor … on 10241, Mar. 2428, 1922. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Huq, Aziz. 2001. Peonage and Contractual Liberty. Columbia Law Review 101 (2): 351–91.Google Scholar
Hurvitz, Haggai. 1986. American Labor Law and the Doctrine of Entrepreneurial Property Rights: Boycotts, Courts, and the Juridical Reorientation of 1886–1895. Industrial Relations Law Journal 18 (3): 307–61.Google Scholar
Huyssen, David. 2014. Progressive Inequality: Rich and Poor in New York, 1890–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Indianapolis Journal. 1897. The Convict Goods Law. The Indianapolis Journal, July 21, p. 4.Google Scholar
Information Annual. 1916. Information Annual 1915—A Continuous Cyclopedia and Digest of Current Events. New York: R. R. Bowker Company.Google Scholar
Ingram, Stephen. 2003. Taking Liberties with Lochner: The Supreme Court, Workmen's Compensation, and the Struggle to Define Liberty in the Progressive Era. Oregon Law Review 82 (3): 779828.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Clyde. 1954. Law Writers and the Courts: The Influence of Thomas M. Cooley, Christopher G. Tiedeman, and John F. Dillon upon American Constitutional Law. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Matthew Frye. 1998. Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jaspar Weekly Courier. 1897. The Indeterminate Sentence Law May Affect Indiana Farm Hands. Jaspar Weekly Courier, August 20, p. 1.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 2005. AHR Forum: The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the New Deal. American Historical Review 110 (4): 1046–51.Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela. 2005. Contracting the Thirteenth Amendment: Hodges v. United States. Boston University Law Review 85 (3): 783809.Google Scholar
Katz, Claudio. 2013. Protective Labor Legislation in the Courts. Law and History Review 31 (2): 275323.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael. 1983. Poverty and Policy in American History. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kens, Paul. 1997. Justice Stephen Field: Shaping Liberty from the Gold Rush to the Gilded Age. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kentucky Board of Prison Commissioners. 1907. Annual Report of the Board of Prison Commissioners to the Governor of Kentucky. Louisville, KY: Globe Printing Company.Google Scholar
Kentucky Corrections Cabinet, Office of Corrections Training. 1988. Changing Faces, Common Walls: History of Corrections in Kentucky, 17th ed. Louisville, KY: Kentucky Corrections Cabinet.Google Scholar
Kerr, James, ed. 1921. The Codes of California, as Amended and in Force at the Close of the Forty-Third session of the Legislature, 1919, Vol. IV Penal Code, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Bender-Moss, 1921.Google Scholar
Leavitt, Julian. 1913a. The Courts and Convict Labor. International Molders Journal 49 (8): 649–56.Google Scholar
Leavitt, Julian. 1913b. Convict Labor vs. Free Labor. Pearson's Magazine 29 (1): 111.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Alex. 1996. Twice the Work of Free Labor: The Political Economy of Convict Labor in the New South. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Lindsay, Matthew. 2010. In Search of “Laissez–Faire Constitutionalism.” Harvard Law Review Forum 123 (5): 5578.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Martha. 2009. What's Left of Solidarity? Reflections on Law, Race, and Labor History. Buffalo Law Review 57 (5): 1515–96.Google Scholar
McCurdy, Charles. 1998. The “Liberty of Contract” Regime in American Law. In The State and Freedom of Contract, ed. Scheiber, Harry, 167–97. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Blake. 1934. The Prison Labor Problem: 1875–1900. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 25 (2): 257–58.Google Scholar
McLennan, Rebecca. 2008. The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Memorial. 1923. 246 Mass. 581 (1923) (John Wilkes Hammond).Google Scholar
Memorial. 1924. 248 Mass. 593 (1924) (James Madison Morton).Google Scholar
Memorial. 1925. 251 Mass. 620 (1925) (Charles Ambrose DeCourcy).Google Scholar
Memorial. 1927. 257 Mass. 597 (1927) (Henry Newton Sheldon).Google Scholar
Memorial. 1931a. 277 Mass. 589 (1931) (William Caleb Loring).Google Scholar
Memorial. 1931b. 275 Mass. 586 (1931) (Henry King Braley).Google Scholar
Memorial. 1939. 302 Mass. 625 (1939) (Arthur Prentice Rugg).Google Scholar
Monkkonen, Eric. 1984. Walking to Work: Tramps in America, 1790–1935. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Monroe Breeze. 1897. Record of the Week. Monroe Breeze, July 15, p. 2.Google Scholar
Montgomery, David. 1967. Beyond Equality: Labor and the Radical Republicans, 1862–1872. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Montgomery, David. 1995. Wage Labor, Bondage, and Citizenship in Nineteenth-Century America. International Labor and Working Class History 48:627.Google Scholar
National Cyclopædia of American Biography. 1920. Arthur Rugg. In The National Cyclopædia of American Biography, Vol. 17. New York: James T. White & Company.Google Scholar
Neff, William. 1921. Bench and Bar of Northern Ohio—History and Biography. Cleveland, OH: Historical Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Nelson, S. B., and Runk, J. M. 1894. History of Cincinnati and Hamilton County, Ohio. Cincinnati, OH: S. B. Nelson & Company Publishers.Google Scholar
Nelson, William. 1988. The Fourteenth Amendment: From Political Principle to Judicial Doctrine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
New York State Historical Society. 1917. Milton Hervey Merwin. Proceedings of the New York State Historical Association, Volume 16. New York: New York State Historical Society.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1891. Broome County Politics. New York Times, August 24, p. 4.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1888. John Clinton Gray Named. New York Times, January 21, p. 1.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1891. Gov. Hill Appoints Judges. New York Times, April 17, p. 1.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1893. Judge Edward T. Bartlett. New York Times, November 19, p. 20.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1894a. Career of Albert Haight. New York Times, September 19, p. 3.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1894b. Must Brand Convict Made Goods. New York Times, August 17, p. 9.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1894c. No Prison Contract Labor. New York Times, August 26, p. 8.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1894d. Ohio Convicts in Idleness. New York Times, December 13, p. 3.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1894e. Opposing Woman Suffrage. New York Times, June 15, p. 1.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1895a. Anxious to Be Justice. New York Times, September 5, p. 9.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1895b. Either Mattice or Lyon. New York Times, September 23, p. 2.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1895c. Scramble for the Bench. New York Times, September 6, p. 9.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1895d. State Officers Elected. New York Times, November 6, p. 9.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1895e. The Boss and the Courts. New York Times, October 28, p. 1.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1896. Candidates for Election. New York Times, November 1, p. 16.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1898. Gov. Pingree Loses His Fight. New York Times, March 17, p. 5.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1900a. Governor Names Judges. New York Times, January 2, p. 2.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1900b. J. Proctor Clarke Appointed. New York Times, December 23, p. 1.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1901. Prevailing Wages Law Unconstitutional. New York Times, February 26, p. 2.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1902. The Importance of Re-Electing Justice Gray. New York Times, November 1, p. 8.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1909a. Fight Over Convict Work. New York Times, August 4, p. 4.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1909b. May Sell Prison Goods. New York Times, October 17, p. S3.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1909c. New York Lawyers Dine Our Judges. New York Times, March 21, p. C8.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1910. Judge E. T. Bartlett Dies in Albany. New York Times, May 4, p. 11.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1919. Mr. Justice Laughlin. New York Times, November 21, p. 10.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1946. Power for Courts Over Labor Urged. New York Times, December 11, p. 7.Google Scholar
New York Tribune. 1904. D. Cady Herrick, Judge Boss of Albany. New York Tribune, October 2, p. 1.Google Scholar
New York Tribune. 1909. O'Malley on Convict Made Goods. New York Daily Tribune, June 9, p. 5.Google Scholar
New York Tribune. 1918. Justice F. M. Scott Resigns from Bench. New York Tribune, March 16, p. 5.Google Scholar
News-Herald. 1895. Ohio Penitentiary. Hillsbourgh News-Herald, January 8, p. 6.Google Scholar
Novak, William. 2010. Law and the Social Control of American Capitalism. Emory Law Journal 60 (2): 377405.Google Scholar
Ohio Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1902. Twenty-Fifth Annual Report of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Columbus, OH: Fred J. Heer, State Printer.Google Scholar
Oklahoma Department of Labor. 1912. Hoge-Montgomery Company, a Company v. Charles L. Daugherty, Commissioner of Labor of the State of Oklahoma. Fifth Annual Report of Department of Labor for the State of Oklahoma, 19111912. Oklahoma City, OK: Warden Printing Company.Google Scholar
Opinion of Brady, Justice. 1910. In Record on Appeal, People ex rel. Phillips v. Raynes. Albany, NY: J. B. Lyon Company State Printers.Google Scholar
Paul, Arnold. 1960. Conservative Crisis and the Rule of Law: Attitudes of Bar and Bench, 1887–1985. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Phelps, Margaret Dorsey. 1992. Idled Outside, Overworked Inside: The Political Economy of Prison Labor During Depressions in Chicago, 1871–1897. PhD diss., Department of History, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
Phillips, Michael. 2001. The Lochner Court, Myth and Reality: Substantive Due Process from the 1890s to the 1930s. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Pugh, David. 1919. Judge Thomas H. Bigger. Ohio Law Reporter 16:539–44.Google Scholar
Ringenbach, Paul. 1973. Tramps and Reformers, 1873–1916: The Discovery of Unemployment in New York. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel. 1978. The Work Ethic in Industrial America, 1850–1920. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sandage, Scott. 2005. Born Losers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. 1999. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877–1917. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Laura Phillips. 2013. Contested Meanings of Freedom: Workingmen's Wages and the Company Store System, and the Godcharles v. Wigeman Decision. Journal for the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 12 (3): 285319.Google Scholar
Schneirov, Richard. 1998. Labor and Urban Politics: Class Conflict and the Origins of Modern Liberalism in Chicago, 1864–97. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Arthur. 1925. Legal Aspects of Convict Labor. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 16 (2): 272–77.Google Scholar
Scobey, F. E., and McElroy, B. L. 1903. The Biographical Annals of Ohio. Springfield, OH: General Assembly.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 1995. Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in the New Deal. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen. 1991. Lochner Era Jurisprudence and the American Constitutional Tradition. North Carolina Law Review 70 (1): 1111.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen. 2002. Comment: The Revision Thickens. Law and History Review 20 (3): 631–37.Google Scholar
Smith, Joseph Patterson. 1898. History of the Republican Party in Ohio, Volume II. Chicago, IL: Lewis Publishing Company Google Scholar
Springfield Daily Republic. 1888. Ohio's Legislators. Springfield Daily Republic, February 11, p. 2.Google Scholar
Stark County Democrat. 1902. Prisoner Kills One Guard, Wounds Another, in Bold Dash for Liberty. Stark County Democrat, May 23, p. 5.Google Scholar
The Albany Law Journal. 1899. Current Topics. Albany Law Journal 60 (23): 354–55.Google Scholar
The Green Bag. 1909. The Late Judge John Kelvey Richards. Green Bag 21 (4): 165.Google Scholar
The Sun. 1898. Stamp on Prison-Made Goods. Sun, October 12.Google Scholar
The Sun. 1904. Got in a Boost for Parker. Sun, March 16.Google Scholar
The Survey. 1913. The Shadow Over New York's State Use System. Survey 29 (17): 537.Google Scholar
The World. 1896. Prison Labor. World, April 26, p. 2.Google Scholar
Tiedeman, Christopher. 1886. A Treatise on the Limitations of Police Power in the United States. St. Louis: F.H. Thomas Law Book Company.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 1985. The State and the Unions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Book Review: The New Deal Constitutional Revolution: Law, Politics, or What? University of Chicago Law Review 66 (3): 1061–80.Google Scholar
Twiss, Benjamin. 1942. Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez Faire Came to the Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Utica Semi-Weekly Herald. 1896. The Labeling of Prison Made Goods. Utica Semi-Weekly Herald, February 26, p. 6.Google Scholar
Walker, Francis. 1896. Restriction of Immigration. Atlantic 77:822–29.Google Scholar
Welke, Barbara. 2010. Law and the Borders of Belonging in the Long Nineteenth Century United States New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Western History Illustrated. 1887. Judge Conway W. Noble. Magazine of Western History Illustrated 6 (1): 165–68.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. 2000. The Constitution and the New Deal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, John Fabian. 2004. The Accidental Republic: Crippled Workingmen, Destitute Widows, and the Remaking of American Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Carroll. 1887. Second Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor: Convict Labor. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 1985. Classes. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Yale University. 1941. Obituary Record of Graduates of Yale University 1939–1940. Bulletin of Yale University 37 (1): 9.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Alabama v. Arizona, 291 U.S. 286 (1934).Google Scholar
Arnold v. Yanders, 56 Ohio St. 417 (1987).Google Scholar
Baldwin Forging & Tool Co. v. Griffith, 18 Ohio Dec. 261 (1907).Google Scholar
Bronk v. Barckley, 13 A.D. 72 (1897).Google Scholar
California v. McCauley, 15 Cal. 429 (1860).Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick v. Bromwell Brush & Wire Goods, 7 Ohio Dec. 216 (1898).Google Scholar
Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251 (1918).Google Scholar
In re Opinion of the Justice, 211 Mass. 605 (1912).Google Scholar
In re Rahrer, 140 U. S. 545 (1891).Google Scholar
In re Yanders, 2 Ohio Dec. 75 (1895).Google Scholar
Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. Illinois Cent. RR., 299 U.S. 334 (1937).Google Scholar
Leisy v. Hardin, 135 U.S. 100 (1890).Google Scholar
Lewis v. New York, 96 N.Y. 71 (1884).Google Scholar
Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1904).Google Scholar
New York v. Chelsea Jute Mills, 43 Misc. 266 (1904).Google Scholar
O'Hare v. Jones, 161 Mass. 391 (1894).Google Scholar
People v. Arensberg, 105 N. Y. 123 (1887).Google Scholar
People v. Hawkins, 32 N.Y.S. 524 (1895).Google Scholar
People v. Hawkins, 20 A.D. 494 (1897).Google Scholar
People v. Hawkins, 157 N.Y. 1 (1898).Google Scholar
People ex rel McCauley v. Brooks, 16 Cal. 11 (1860).Google Scholar
Perkins v. Heert, 158 N.Y. 306 (1899).Google Scholar
Phillips v. Raynes, 136 A.D. 417 (1910).Google Scholar
Plumley v. Massachusetts, 155 U.S. 461 (1894).Google Scholar
Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873).Google Scholar
Wallerstein v. Board of Control, 116 Mich. 365 (1898).Google Scholar
Whitfield v. Ohio, 196 N.E. 164 (1935).Google Scholar
Whitfield v. Ohio, 297 U.S. 431 (1936).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Ashurst–Sumners Act, Pub. L. No. 74-215, 49 Stat. 494 (1935).Google Scholar
Hawes-Cooper Act, Pub. L. No. 71-218, 45 Stat. 1084 (1929).Google Scholar