No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Versions of Academic Freedom, by Stanley Fish. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014, xiii + 163pp ($24 cloth). ISBN: 97800226064314.
Review products
Versions of Academic Freedom, by Stanley Fish. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014, xiii + 163pp ($24 cloth). ISBN: 97800226064314.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2015
References
1. Silver, DJ ‘The higher gamesmanship – there's no such thing as free speech’ (1994) 58 Commentary 59–61 at 61.Google Scholar
2. MacFarquhar, L ‘The dean's list’ (2001) The New Yorker 11 June, 62–71 at 62.Google Scholar
3. The Clarendon Lectures form the basis of his Professional Correctness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
4. Cunningham, V ‘Book review: Professional Correctness: Literary Studies and Political Change ’ (1995) 8(382) New Statesman & Society.Google Scholar
5. Lodge, D Trilogy (London: Penguin, 1993) pp 270-245.Google Scholar
6. Eagleton, T ‘The estate agent: Stanley Fish and his trouble with principles’ in Olson, GA and Worsham, L Postmodern Sophistry (New York: State University of New York Press, 2004) pp 181–188 at 188.Google Scholar
7. The Fugitive in Flight (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010).Google Scholar
8. How to Write a Sentence: And How to Read One (New York: HarperCollins, 2011).Google Scholar
9. Fish, S Versions of Academic Freedom (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014) pp 6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ibid, p x.
11. See eg Farrington, DJ and Palfreyman, D The Law of Higher Education (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) pp 371–385.Google Scholar
12. See eg s 32(2) of the Higher Education Act 2004, s 26 of the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Act 2005, s 202 of the Higher Education Act 1988 and Art 13 of the Charter for Fundamental Rights.
13. See s 6 of the Defamation Act 2013.
14. See Urofsky v Gilmore 216 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2000), in which the Fourth Circuit upheld a law preventing state employees in Virginia from accessing explicit sexual materials on state-owned Pcs without authorisation from a superior.
15. Menand, L ‘The limits of academic freedom’ in Menand, L (ed) The Future of Academic Freedom (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996) pp 3–20.Google Scholar
16. Docherty, T ‘Hostile takeover’ Times Higher Education Supplement 4 December 2014.Google Scholar See also D Matthews ‘Thomas Docherty to face insubordination charge in tribunal’ Times Higher Education Supplement, 24 July 2014; available at http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/thomas-docherty-to-face-insubordination-charge-in-tribunal/2014711.article (accessed 14 January 2015).
17. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/22/oxford-university-academic-shard-jail-place-hacker-garrett (accessed 14 January 2015)..‘Oxford University academic who scaled Shard is spared jail sentence’ The Guardian 22 May 2014; available at
18. Fish, S Save the World on Your Own Time (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Ibid, pp 12–13.
20. Ibid, p 20.
21. Ibid, p 30.
22. Fish, above n 9, pp 34–35.
23. See eg Chomsky, N ‘The responsibility of intellectuals’ New York Review of Books 2 February 1967;Google Scholar and Rorty, R Achieving our Country (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
24. Rorty, R ‘Does academic freedom have philosophical presuppositions?’ in Menand, above n 15, pp 21–42.Google Scholar
25. Fish, above n 9, p 132.
26. Ibid, p 134.
27. Ibid, p 130.
28. Fish, above n 3, p 2.
29. Rorty likewise agrees when he argues that ‘accumulated experience has taught us […] that universities are unlikely to remain healthy and free once people outside the universities take a hand in redrawing [its] line[s]’; above n 24, p 28.
30. See in particular Collini, S What Are Universities For? (London: Penguin, 2012);Google Scholar as well as the useful overview found in Collier, R ‘Privatizing the university and the new political economy of socio-legal studies: remaking the (legal) academic subject’ (2014) 40 J L Soc'y 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. See eg Bradley, A Conversations, Choices and Chances: The Liberal Law School in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar
32. Fish, above n 18, p 67.
33. Ibid.
34. Conford, FM ‘Microcosmographia academica: being a guide for the young academic politician’ (1908); available at https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/iau/cornford/cornford.html (accessed 14 January 2015) at 4.Google Scholar
35. Fish was dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago from 1999 to 2004, and before that chairman of the English department at Duke University. At Duke, Fish's tenure has, however, varyingly been described as transforming the department into ‘the professional powerhouse of the day’ and for resting on the ‘hiring [of] celebrity couples’. See D Yaffe ‘The department that fell to earth: the deflation of Duke English’ (1999) 9(1) Lingua Franca: the Review of Academic Life 24–31; and ‘The indefensible Stanley Fish’ Slate Magazine 27 December 1999; available at http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/culturebox/1999/12/the_indefensible_stanley_fish.single.html (accessed 14 January 2015).
36. See ‘No bias, no merit: the case against blind submission’ in Doing What Comes Naturally (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989) pp 164–179 at 175.Google Scholar
37. Fish, S ‘Deep in the heart of Texas’ New York times Opinionator, 21 June 2010; available at http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/21/deep-in-the-heart-of-texas/?_r=0 (accessed 14 January 2015).Google Scholar
38. See eg Fish, S ‘Liberalism doesn't exist’ in There's No Such Thing as Free Speech (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994) pp 134–138.Google Scholar
39. Ibid, p 135. See also Fish, S ‘Mission impossible’ in Fish, S The Trouble with Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999) pp 162–186.Google Scholar
40. Ibid, p 136.
41. Fish, above n 39, p 180.
42. Ibid, p 168, anglicised.
43. For a particularly enlightening example, see Kahan, DM and Braman, D ‘Cultural cognition and public policy’ (2006) 24 Yale L & Pol'y Rev 147.Google Scholar
44. Foucault, M ‘The concern for truth’ in Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984, ed. Kritzman, LD (New York: Routledge, 1988) p 265.Google Scholar
45. Posner, RA Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003) p 35.Google Scholar
46. Fish, S ‘The unbearable ugliness of Volvos’ in Fish, above n 38, pp 273–279 at 276.Google Scholar