Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:31:52.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A look back at a long-forgotten trigonometric function: the versine function and its inverse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Seán M. Stewart*
Affiliation:
Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal23955-6900, Saudi Arabia e-mail: sean.stewart@physics.org

Extract

Ask anyone who has studied mathematics to a moderate level how many trigonometric functions there are and one is likely to be presented with a range of answers depending on what the person being asked is most likely to remember. Perhaps the ‘calculator button’ three of sine, cosine, and tangent will come to mind as these are the three trigonometric functions found on any standard scientific calculator. At a stretch, perhaps the names for their respective reciprocals, cosecant, secant and cotangent, will be recalled. Beyond the modern standard six, looking at calculus or trigonometric texts published prior to 1900 one soon discovers others going by strange names such as versine, haversine, or coversine (see, for example, [1, pp. 53, 63]). There are at least six others with as many as perhaps ten to twelve having received a name at one time or another. Today all these additional trigonometric functions considered important enough to grace the pages of texts in centuries past have fallen by the wayside, to be largely forgotten in favour of the modern standard six. Of course the pedant amongst us would say there is only one trigonometric function, the sine function, which currently stands as the preferred fundamental trigonometric entity, with all others being simple variations of this function, and they would not be incorrect in asserting this. But having the current standard six seems about the right balance between the minimalistic on the one hand and convenience on the other hand.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Authors, 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mathematical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rice, John Minot and Johnson, William Woolsey, An elementary treatise on the differential calculus founded on the method of rates or fluxions, Wiley (1879).Google Scholar
Lehmer, D. H., Interesting series involving the central binomial coefficient, Amer. Math. Monthly 92 (August–September 1985) pp. 449457.10.1080/00029890.1985.11971651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Carl B., A history of mathematics (2nd edn.), Wiley (1991).Google Scholar
Sinnott, Roger W., Virtues of the haversine, Sky Telesc. 68 (August 1984) p. 159.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Milton and Stegun, Irene A. (editors), Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Dover (1965).Google Scholar
Oldham, Keith, Jan Myland and Jerome Spanier, An atlas of functions (2nd edn.), Springer (2009).10.1007/978-0-387-48807-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Seán M., How to integrate it: a practical guide to finding elementary integrals, Cambridge University Press (2018).Google Scholar
Vetterli, Martin, Kovaševis, Jelena, and Gayal, Vivek K., Foundations of signal processing, Cambridge University Press (2014).10.1017/CBO9781139839099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, H. W. (ed.), The correspondence of Isaac Newton, Volume II, Cambridge University Press (1960).Google Scholar
Weisstein, Eric W., CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics (2nd edn.), Chapman & Hall/CRC (2003).10.1201/9781420035223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Richard P., Catalan numbers, Cambridge University Press (2015).10.1017/CBO9781139871495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koshy, Thomas, Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers with applications Volume 1 (2nd edn.), Wiley (2018).10.1002/9781118742297CrossRefGoogle Scholar