Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:33:58.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On sets of fractional dimensions (II)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

E. Best
Affiliation:
The Queen's UniversityBelfast

Extract

1. Any number x between 0 and 1 may be expressed uniquely in the form

where xr is a non-negative integer less than r (r = 2,3,…). We consider the set E of numbers x for which

We establish an inequality connecting the dimensional number of the set E with certain constants of the series

in particular we show that, when ξτ = rθ, the dimensional number of E is θ. We are concerned with the measure of Hausdorff.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hausdorff, F., “Dimension und äusseres Mass”, Math. Annalen, 79 (1919), 157–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besicovitch, A. S., “Linear sets of points of fractional dimensions”, Math. Annalen, 101 (1929), 161–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

§ We write sm*E in place of t sm*E where there can be no ambiguity.

Best, , “A closed dimensionless linear set”, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2), 6 (1939), 105–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillis, J., “Note on a theorem of Myrberg”, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 33 (1937), 419–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For if 0 <fmE<∞ and then gmE = ∞.

I am indebted to the referee here for a considerable simplification of the argument.