Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:09:56.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ankerites of the Northumberland coal-field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

L. Hawkes  and
J. A. Smythe
L. Hawkes
Affiliation:
Bedford College, University of London
J. A. Smythe
Affiliation:
Armstrong College, Newcastle-on-Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The first recognition of ankerite as a British mineral seems to have been made a little over fifty years ago by M. F. Heddle, who described and analysed a sample from the Ting of Norwick, Unst. The occurrence of the mineral in veins in the Carboniferous Limestone of Lilleshall, Shropshire, was recorded by C. J. Woodward, who gives analyses of two specimens. T. Crook noted the frequent occurrence of the mineral in British coal-fields and described specimens, with two analyses, from Lancashire, Yorkshire, Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire, and South Wales. F. S. Sinnatt and his collaborators, in their work on the mineral constituents of coal, devote a good deal of attention to the 'white partings' or ankerites, of which, as they say, 'no study has appeared in the literature'.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 24 , Issue 149 , June 1935 , pp. 65 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 65 note 1 Heddle, M. F., Min. Mag., 1878, vol. 2, p. 20.Google Scholar

page 65 note 2 Woodward, C. J., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, 1883, vol. 39, p. 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 65 note 3 Crook, T., Min. Mag., 1912, vol. 16, p. 219.Google Scholar

page 65 note 4 Sinnatt, F. S., A. Grounds, and Bailey, F., Journ. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1921, vol. 40, p. 1.Google Scholar

page 65 note 5 Sinnatt, F. S. and Simpkin, N., Journ. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1922, vol. 41, p. 167.Google Scholar Sinnatt, F. S. and Mitton, H. E., Inst. Min. Eng., 1924, vol. 67, p. 486.Google Scholar

page 65 note 6 Briggs, H., Inst. Min. Eng., 1928-1929, vol. 77, p. 5.Google Scholar

page 69 note 1 Doelter, C., Handb. d. Mineralchem., 1912, vol. 1, p. 371.Google Scholar

page 70 note 1 Foote, H. W. and Bradley, W. M., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1914, ser. 4, vol. 37, p. 343.Google Scholar

page 70 note 2 Ford, W. E., Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts and Sci., 1917, vol. 22, p. 243.Google Scholar [Min. Abstr., 1–10.]

page 70 note 3 Eisenhuth, K., Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1902, vol. 35, p. 584.Google Scholar

page 70 note 4 W. E. Ford, loc. cit.

page 70 note 5 Gaubert, P., Bull. Soc. Franç. Min, 1919, vol. 42, p. 88.Google Scholar [M.A., 2–188.]

page 70 note 6 Koller, P., Neues Jahrb. Min., 1919, Beil.-Bd. 42, p. 457.Google Scholar [M.A., 1–350.]

page 70 note 7 Ulke, T., Amer. Min., 1933, vol. 18, p. 312.Google Scholar [M.A., 5–517.]

page 70 note 8 De Klerk, A. and Goldschmidt, V., Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., 1925, vol. 38, p. 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar [M.A., 3–213.]

page 71 note 1 Winchell, A. N., Elements of optical mineralogy, part 2, 3rd edit., 1933, p. 74.Google Scholar

page 72 note 1 Foote, H. W. and Bradley, W. M., loc. cit.; De Klerk, A. and Goldschmidt, V., loc. cit.; Louis, H., Proc. Nova Scotian Inst. Nat. Sci., 1882, vol. 5, p. 47.Google Scholar

page 74 note 1 Stocks, H. B., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, 1902, vol. 58, p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar