Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:32:12.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EU membership, financial services and stability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Angus Armstrong*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research and Centre for Macroeconomics

Abstract

This paper examines whether EU membership enhances or diminishes the UK's financial sector stability, and therefore its prominence in global finance. The UK is host to the largest share of financial services in the EU, despite being outside of the Eurozone. An important reason is that, as a member of the EU, the UK has direct access to the Eurozone's financial infrastructure. If the UK leaves the EU (and EEA) banks and other financial services firms may continue to have access to the Single Market, but they are unlikely to have direct access to the Eurozone's infrastructure. Banks in the UK will no longer be direct members the Eurozone's payments system. The swap arrangement between the European Central Bank and Bank of England would have no legal enforcement mechanism. Resolution of cross-border banks would be more challenging with less incentive for a cooperative outcome. While some may welcome the reduced size of the financial system, not without reason, this could be achieved more effectively with domestic regulation than by leaving the EU. Given the uncertainty that would follow a vote to leave, there is a risk of capital flight.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avdjiev, S., McCauley, R.Shin, H. (2015), ‘Breaking free of the triple coincidence in international finance’, BIS Working Papers No 524.Google Scholar
Burrows, O.Low, K. (2015), ‘Mapping the UK financial system’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Q2.Google Scholar
European Central Bank (2011), Eurosysem Oversight Policy Framework, http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/eurosystemoversightpolicyframework2011en.pdf.Google Scholar
HM Government (2014), Review of the Balance of Competences between the United Kingdom and the European Union: The Single Market: Financial Services and the Free Movement of Capital.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2014), ‘Who said payment systems are simple?’, European Banking Federation, http://enews.ebf-fbe.eu/2014/01/who-said-payment-systems-are-simple-legal-issues-arising-from-the-structure-of-target-2/.Google Scholar
Jorda, O.Schularick, M.Taylor, A. (2011), ‘Financial crises, credit booms, and external imbalances: 140 years of lessons’, IMF Economic Review, 59, 2, pp. 340–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyer, C. (2016), Benefits of Britain's Membership, OMFIF, The Bulletin, http://www.omfif.org/analysis/commentary/2016/march/benefits-of-britains-membership/.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D (2000), ‘How far will international economic integration go?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (1), pp. 177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelkle, W.Lokdam, H. (Rapporteurs) (2015), ‘Financial regulation and the protection of eurozone outs’, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Schoenmaker, D. (2013), Governance of International Banking, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TheCityUK (2016), A Practioner's guide to Brexit, www.thecityuk.com.Google Scholar