Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:44:36.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Memory claims and memory constraints. (Re)negotiating statehood and identities in Serbia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Sladjana Lazic
Sladjana Lazic*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, Emails: lazic@svt.ntnu.no; sladja.lazic@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rather than focusing on often-explored mnemonic practices (memorials, national celebrations, commemorations etc.) the article addresses the role that remembering, as a part of a wider political culture, plays in situations where images of the past are not visible per se, but are implied or even openly invoked to explain and (de)legitimize choices political actors make. By analyzing the interactions of memories and new institutional arrangements related to minority rights in the case of the Bosniak minority in Serbia, the article shows how recollections in political claims and policy-making were used as a medium for negotiations and the contestation of both political interests and competing “group-making projects”.

Keywords

SerbiaBosniaksrememberingidentities
Type
Special Section: Memeory and Identity in the Yugoslav Successor States
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 41 , Issue 6 , November 2013 , pp. 936 - 952
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrens, Geert-Hinrich. 2007. Diplomacy on the Edge: Containment of Ethnic Conflict and the Minorities Working Group of the Conferences on Yugoslavia. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Balimor, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Berger, Tomas. 2002. “The Power of Memory and Memories of Power: The Cultural Parameters of German Foreign Policy-Making Since 1945.” In Memory and Power in Post-War Europe. Studies in the Presence of the Past, edited by Muller, Jan-Werner, 76–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2007. “Serbia: Minorities in a Reluctant State.” European Yearbook of Minority Issues 5 (2005/6): 243–250.Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2009. “Territory, Identity and the Challenge of Serbia's EU Integration.” In Serbia Matters: Domestic Reforms and European Integration, edited by Petritsch, Wolfgang and Svilanovic, Goran, 65–71. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Biševac, Safeta. 2000. “Bosniaks in Sandzak and Interethnic tolerance in Novi Pazar.” In Managing Multiethnic Communities in the Countries of the Former Yugoslavia, edited by Dimitrijevic, Nenad, 387–398. Budapest: LGL.Google Scholar
Bougarel, Xavier. 2003. “Islam and Politics in the Post-Communist Balkans (1990–2000).” In New Approaches to Balkan States, edited by Keridis, Dimitris and Perry, Charles, 345–360. Dules: Brassey's.Google Scholar
Brković, Č. 2008. “Upravljanje osecanjima pripadanja: Antropoloska analiza “kulture” i “identiteta” u Ustavu Republike Srbije.” Etnoantropoloski problemi, 3 (2): 59–76.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed/Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dimitrijevic, Nenad. 2008. “Serbia after the Criminal Past: What Went Wrong and What Should Be Done.” The International Journal of Transitional Justice 2 (1): 5–22.Google Scholar
Ejdus, Filip. 2008. “Security, Culture and Identity in Serbia.” In Western Balkans Security Observer, 38–64. English Edition 7–8 (2007–2008). www.ceeol.com Google Scholar
Gojković, Nevena. 2009. “Sistem zastite manjina u Srbiji.” Accessed December 30, 2011. http://www.kas.de/upload/auslandshomepages/serbien/Gojkovic_pred.pdf Google Scholar
Guzina, Dejan. 2000. “Nation - Building vs. Minority-Destroying: Majority-Minority Relations in Post-Socialist Serbia.” Southeast Europe Politics 1 (1): 25–40.Google Scholar
Kostovicova, Denisa. 2005. “Post-Socialist Identity, Territoriality and European Integration: Serbia's Return to Europe after Milosevic.” Geojournal 61 (1): 22–30.Google Scholar
Kuzio, Taras. 2001. “'Nationalising States’ or Nation-Building? A Critical Review of the Theoretical Literature and Empirical Evidence.” Nations and Nationalism 7 (2): 135–154.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2004. “Justice and Security in the Accommodation of Minority Nationalism.” In Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights, edited by Stephen May, Tariq Modood and Squires, Judith, 144–175. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lošonc, Alpar. 2009. “Political Representation as an Expression of the Relationship between Majority and Minority.” In Serbia at the Political Crossroads, edited by Vujadinović, Dragica and Goati, Vladimir, 87–107. Belgrade: CEDET & FES.Google Scholar
Lyon, James. 2008. “Serbia's Sandzak Under Milosevic: Identity, Nationalism and Survival.” Human rights Review 9 (1): 71–92.Google Scholar
Morrison, Kenneth. 2008. Political and Religious Conflict in the Sandzak, Advance Research and Assessment Group. Balkan Series 08 (13). Defence Academy of the United Kingdom. http://www.da.mod.uk/colleges/arag/document-listings/balkan/08(13)KM.pdf/view Google Scholar
Muller, Jan-Wermer. 2002. “Introduction: The Power of Memory, the Memory of Power and the Power over Memory.” In Memory and Power in Post-War Europe. Studies in the Presence of the Past, edited by Muller, Jan-Werner, 1–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Obradovic-Wochnik, Jelena. 2009. “Knowledge, Acknowledgement, and Denial in Serbia's Responses to the Srebrenica Massacre.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17 (1): 61–74.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey. 2007. The Politics of Regret: On Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey, and Levy, Daniel. 1997. “Collective Memory and Cultural Constraint: Holocaust Myth and Rationality in German Politics.” American Sociological Review 62 (6): 921–936.Google Scholar
Orentlicher, Diane F. 2008. Shrinking the Space for Denial. The Impact of the ICTY in Serbia. New York: Open Society Justice Initiative.Google Scholar
Poulton, Hugh. 2000. “The Muslim Experience in the Balkan States, 1919–1991.” Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 28 (1): 45–66.Google Scholar
Ron, James. 2003. Frontiers and Ghettos. State Violence in Serbia and Israel. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
“Serbia's Sandzak: Still Forgotten.” 2005. Crisis Group Europe Report No 162, 8 April 2005. Accessed December 30, 2011. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/162_serbia_s_sandzak_still_forgotten.pdf Google Scholar
Snyder, Timothy. 2002. “Memory of Sovereignty and Sovereignty over Memory: Poland, Lithuania and Ukraine 1939–1999.” In Memory and Power in Post-War Europe. Studies in the Presence of the Past, edited by Muller, Jan-Werner, 39–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spoerri, Marlene. 2011. “Justice Imposed: How Policies of Conditionality Effect Transitional Justice in the Former Yugoslavia.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (10): 1827–1851.Google Scholar
Subotić, Jelena. 2009. Hijacked Justice. Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Várady, Tibor. 1997. “Minorities, Majorities, Law and Ethnicity: Reflections of the Yugoslav Case.” Human Rights Quarterly 19 (1): 9–54.Google Scholar
Vermeersch, Peter. 2003. “EU Enlargement and Minority Rights Policies in Central Europe: Explaining Policy Shifts in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.” Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, no. 1:1–32. ECMI, Flensburg.Google Scholar