Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:25:52.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Gerard Toal's “‘Republika Srpska will have a referendum’: The rhetorical politics of Milorad Dodik”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Danijela Majstorović
Danijela Majstorović*
Affiliation:
University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
*
∗Email: majstorovic.danijela@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Writing about the rhetoric of Milorad Dodik, one certainly has to bear in mind his beginnings, especially as a 1998 RS prime minister whom Albright (1998) called a “breath of fresh air” and someone “determined to peacebuilding, reconciliation and connection of democratic alternative” in Bosnia and Herzegovina (henceforth BiH). Dodik's early rhetoric that brought him to power abounded in phrases such as “economic progress,” “debt return,” and “opening to the world,” while some media reports referred to him as the “America-supported man who occasionally attended Ambassador Miller's secret dinners” (Dani, 22 September 2000) (Majstorovic et al. 2010). In 1998, Dodik attended donors’ conferences and was given significant support to pursue the reforms he started, including normalization of relations with the BiH Federation and Croatia. In 1998, his results secured him between $400 million and $600 million in aid money (Beta, 13 May 1998).

Keywords

Republika SrpskaMilorad Dodikpolitical rhetoric
Type
Comments
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 209 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, Madeleine. 20 February 1998. http://www.hri.org/news/usa/voa/1998/98-02-20.voa.html.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image-Music-Text. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1981. “Rhetoric of the Image.” In Image, Music, Text, edited by Heath, S., 32–51. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Beta. Glas Srpske. 13 May 1998.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1987. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse - Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Connolly, E. William 1991. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dani 173. Intervju sa Miloradom Dodikom. 22 September 2000. http://www.bhdani.com/arhiva/173/inter.htm. Accessed 28 November 2012.Google Scholar
Dani 271. Intervju sa Miloradom Dodikom. 23 August 2002. http://www.bhdani.com/arhiva/271/t27114.shtml. Accessed 28 November 2011.Google Scholar
Dodik: Dolazak Ketrin Ešton strateška pobeda RS. 24 May 2011. http://www.naslovi.net/2011-05-24/press/dodik-dolazak-ketrin-eston-strateska-pobeda-rs/2558987.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
“Federacija je inostranstvo.” 1990. Interview of Prime Minister Dodik. Vreme, 19 February.Google Scholar
FoNet. Večernje novosti. Dodik: Referendum je neizbežan. http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/aktuelno.289.html: 187744-Dodik-Referendum-je-neizbezan. Accessed 20 November 2012.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2001. Textual Interaction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Majstorović et al. 2010. “Politike nemogućeg: analiza diskursa vodećih političara u Bosni i Hercegovini u periodu 1998-2009” (“Impossible Politics: Discourse Analysis of BiH Leading Politicians Between 1998-2009”). Puls demokratije. Sarajevo: Open Society Fund. http://www.pulsdemokratije.ba/index.php?id=1965&l=bs Google Scholar
Musloff, Andrew. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasing in Debates about Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Novi Reporter 136. 19 October 2005. http://www.novireporter.com/look/reporter/nr_home.tpl?IdLanguage=11&IdPublication=2&NrIssue=136. Accessed 28 November 2012.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, and Hamilton, H. E., eds. 2001. Handbook of Discourse AnalysisOxfovd: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tadić, S., and Domazet, Ž. 2011. “Velika pobjeda Milorada Dodika, Ketrin Ešton sređuje pravosuđe.” Glas Srpske, 13 May. http://www.glassrpske.com/novosti/vijesti_dana/Velika-pobjeda-Milorada-Dodika-Ketrin-Eston-sredjuje-pravosudje/lat/57707.html Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Elite Discourse and Racism. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A., ed. 1997. Discourse Studies. 2 vols. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Vreme 946. Intervju- Milorad Dodik premijer Republike Srpske “Federacija je inostranstvo”. 19 October 2009. http://www.vreme.com/cms/view.php?id=825137&print=yes. Accessed 20 November 2012.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Meyer, Michael. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. The Discourse of Politics as Action: Politics As Usual. 2nd edition. Palgrave.Google Scholar