Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:44:00.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ups and downs of signalling between root and shoot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2000

Christine Beveridge
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia (tel +61 7 3365 8582; fax +61 7 3365 1699; e-mail c.beveridge@botany.uq.edu.au).
Get access

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly apparent that the long-distance signalling associated with many developmental processes is complex and that novel hormone-like signals may play substantial roles. The past decades have seen several substances (e.g. brassinosteroids, systemin and other polypeptides, mevalonic and jasmonic acids, polyamines, oligosaccharides, flavonoids, and quinones) vie for a place among the classical plant hormones (e.g. Spaink, 1996). Recent microinjection and grafting studies have also shown that RNA may act as a long-distance signal (Jorgensen et al., 1998; Xoconostle-Cázares et al., 1999). In this issue, Hannah et al. describe long-distance signalling and the regulation of root–shoot partitioning in dwarf lethal or dosage-dependent lethal (DL) mutants of common bean (Shii et al., 1980, 1981), and present evidence indicating that substances in addition to classical plant hormones (e.g. cytokinins) may be involved.

As in the report by Hannah et al., much of the evidence for roles of unidentified long-distance signals in the control of plant development is indirect. The possibility that a small number of long-distance signals might control a multitude of developmental processes arises through the potential for differences in tissue sensitivity, fluctuations in hormone levels and differences in the nature of responses of different tissues to the same hormone. Consequently, particular hormones may influence numerous processes seemingly simultaneously, yet independently. Even so, long-distance signalling is involved in processes as diverse as root–shoot balance, senescence, branching, flowering, nodulation, stress responses and nutrient uptake. Through comparison of even a few different developmental processes, progress can be made to reveal the true complexity of plant development. Using this approach it is also clear that many unknown signals may be involved.

Type
FORUM Commentary
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)