Summary

Prescribers face a range of ethical dilemmas in their everyday practice. In this article, the principles-based approach to biomedical ethics developed by Beauchamp and Childress is outlined, with a particular focus on ‘respect for autonomy’. It is argued that the purpose of ethical reflection is to deepen and enrich more general reflection about clinical practice, rather than to provide definitive answers to dilemmas in prescribing.

Jones M. Case report. Nurse prescribing: a case study in policy influence. J Nursing Mgmt 2004; 12: 266–272.

Professional Nurse 2004; 19(11): 35–37.

Watret L. and McFarlane D. Audit of wound management practice. J Community Nursing 2004; 18(7): 11–17.

McAllister J. An overview of the current asthma disease management guidance. British Journal of Nursing 2004; 13(9): 512–517.

Trim J. Clinical skills: a practical guide to working out drug calculations. British Journal of Nursing 2004; 13(10): 602–606.

Matthews E. Concordance with pain medication: reflection on an adverse incident. British Journal of Nursing 2004; 13(9): 551–555.

Fullbrook S. What do the public think of the new ‘nurdoc’ role? British Journal of Nursing 2004; 13(9): 564.

Lewis C. The late show. Health Service Journal 2004; 8 April: 28–29.

Tyer D. Targeting the new prescribers. Pharmafocus 2004; May

Smith J. Consultation and nursing skills: reaching a diagnosis. Prescribing Nurse 2004; Summer; 22–26.

Shuttleworth A. Improving drug concordance in patients with chronic conditions. Nursing Times 2004; 100(24): 28–29.

New developments in non-medical prescribing help WTD solutions. Calling Time 2004; 9: 6–7.

Belvisi MG and Geppetti P. Cough.7: Current and future drugs for the treatment of chronic cough. Thorax 2004; 59:438–440.

Hay A. et al. Supplementary nurse prescribing. Nursing Standard 2004; 18(41): 33–39.