Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:46:33.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instruments INDIA: A sound archive for educational and compositional use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2014

Manuella Blackburn*
Affiliation:
Department of Music, Liverpool Hope University, Creative Campus, 17 Shaw Street, Liverpool, L6 1HP, UK

Abstract

This article documents the evolution of the ‘Instruments INDIA’ project, which led to the creation of an online sound archive of Indian musical instruments. Recording work with approximately 27 musicians provided material for this interactive resource (which functions as an educational tool and concertgoer's guide), and also for compositional work, where culturally tied sound material formed the basis for two new works; Javaari (acousmatic) and New shruti (mixed work) for sarod and electronics. Trialling a variety of methods for gathering and then subsequently integrating sounds from Indian musical instruments into electroacoustic compositions provided a framework for the exploration of hybridity and intercultural sound interactions, while observing the translation and transference of highly emblematic sounds from one musical tradition to the next also led to unique artistic and theoretical outcomes. Curatorial decisions made with my project partners, Milapfest (the UK's leading Indian Arts Development Trust) regarding the participating musicians and their sound contributions posed further considerations for the representative quality of each instrument showcased on the archive. Gathering appropriate material for users of the archive (young learners, audience members and interested laypeople) while capturing sounds suitable for compositional purposes presented new challenges within the recording environment. Further complexities surfaced when this challenge was coupled with a lesser degree of familiarity with instrument capabilities, playing styles and cultural traditions. This unique collaboration with cultural sounds and performance practices raised questions about my compositional intentions, cross-cultural borrowing, respectful practice, and the unavoidable undertones of cultural appropriation and colonial attitude.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battey, B. 2004. Bézier Spline Modeling of Pitch-Continuous Melodic Expression and Ornamentation. Computer Music Journal 28(4): 2539.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2010. Electroacoustic Music Incorporating Latin American Influences: A Consideration of Implications, Reception and Borrowing. eContact! 12(4), http://cec.sonus.ca/econtact/12_4/blackburn_influences.html (accessed 6 May 2013).Google Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2011. The Sonic Souvenir: Issues of Cross-Cultural Composition. Electronic Music Studies Network Conference Online Proceedings, http://www.ems-network.org/IMG/pdf_EMS11_Blackburn.pdf (accessed 13 April 2013).Google Scholar
Blackburn, M., Nayak, A. 2013. Performer as Sound Source: Interactions and Mediations in the Recording Studio and Field. Unpublished conference paper from the Electronic Music Studies Network Conference, Lisbon, 2013.Google Scholar
Cusack, P. 2012. Sounds from Dangerous Places. London: ReR.Google Scholar
d'Escrivan, J., Jackson, P. 2008. Applied Plunderphonia: Tagging Electronic Music with Electronic Music. Electronic Music Studies Network Conference online proceedings, http://www.ems-network.org/ems08/papers/escrivan.pdf (accessed 10 March 2013).Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. (ed). 2000. Music, Electronic Media and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2006. Appropriation, Exchange and Understanding. Electronic Music Studies Network Conference Online Proceedings, http://www.ems-network.org/IMG/pdf_EmmersonEMS06.pdf (accessed 15 April 2013).Google Scholar
Fischman, R. 1999. Global Village, Local Universe: A Statement of Identity. Leonardo Music Journal 9: 5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. 1999. Imaginary Space: Spaces in the Imagination. Australasian Computer Music Conference keynote address, http://cec.sonus.ca/econtact/ACMA/ACMConference.htm (accessed 03 March 2013).Google Scholar
Root, D. 1996. Cannibal Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sannicandro, J. 2012. A Closer Look: Montreal's AKOUSMA Festival, A Closer Listen (19 November), http://acloserlisten.com/2012/11/19/a-closer-look-montreals-akousma-festival (accessed 4 February 2013).Google Scholar
Schafer, R.M. 1977. Our Sonic Environment and the Soundscape: The Tuning of the World. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.Google Scholar
Urry, J., Larson, J. 2011. The Tourist Gaze. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Young, J.O. 2008. Profound Offense and Cultural Appropriation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63(2): 135146.Google Scholar

Blackburn Supplementary Material

Sound 1

Download Blackburn Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 606.6 KB

Blackburn Supplementary Material

Sound 2

Download Blackburn Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 552.5 KB

Blackburn Supplementary Material

Sound 3

Download Blackburn Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 166.3 KB

Blackburn Supplementary Material

Sound 4

Download Blackburn Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 346 KB

Blackburn Supplementary Material

Sound 5

Download Blackburn Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 1.3 MB

Blackburn Supplementary Material

Sound 6

Download Blackburn Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 1.7 MB

Blackburn Supplementary Material

Sound 7

Download Blackburn Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 730.2 KB