Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:34:50.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Gender and Comparative Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2016

Niels Spierings
Niels Spierings*
Affiliation:
Radboud University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Online Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , E6
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerly, Brooke A., and True, Jacqui. 2010. Doing Feminist Research in Political and Social Science. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke A., and True, Jacqui. 2013. “Methods and Methodologies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, ed. Waylen, Georgina, Celis, Karen, Kantola, Johanna, and Laurel Weldon, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus B.. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Jessie. 1975 Women, Wives and Mothers: Values and Options. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
Bottero, Wendy. 2000. “Gender and the Labour Market at the Turn of the Century: Complexity, Ambiguity and Change.” Work, Employment & Society 14 (4): 781–91.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, eds. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Bustelo, Maria, and Verloo, Mieke. 2009. “Grounding Policy Evaluation in a Discursive Understanding of Politics.” In The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policy-Making, ed. Lombardo, Emanuela, Meier, Petra, and Verloo, Mieke. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research. Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Mazur, Amy G., eds. 2008. Politics, Gender, and Concepts: Theory and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1997. “Is There a Feminist Method?” In Feminisms, ed. Kemp, Sandra and Squires, Judith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene N., and Leavy, Patricia L., eds. 2007. Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Jayaratne, Toby E. 1983. “The Value of Quantitative Methodology for Feminist Research.” In Theories of Women's Studies, ed. Bowles, Gloria and Klein, Renate Duelli. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert Owen, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Leslie 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (3): 1771–1800.Google Scholar
Millman, Marcia, and Kanter, Rosabeth M.. 1975. Another Voice: Feminist Perspectives on Social Life and Social Science. New York: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Ann, and Oakley, Robin. 1979. Sexism in Official Statistics. In Demystifying Social Statistics, ed. Irvine, John, Miles, Ian, and Evans, Jeff. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rihoux, Benoît, and Ragin, Charles C.. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Spierings, Niels. 2012. The Inclusion of Quantitative Techniques and Diversity in the Mainstream of Feminist Research. European Journal of Women's Studies 19 (3): 331–47.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2005. What is your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions. International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Verloo, Mieke. 2005. “Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe. A Critical Frame Analysis Approach.” The Greek Review of Social Research 117: 11–34.Google Scholar