Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:35:19.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ESTIMATES OF BEST CONSTANTS FOR WEIGHTED POINCARÉ INEQUALITIES ON CONVEX DOMAINS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2006

SENG-KEE CHUA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, 2, Science Drive 2, Singapore 117543, Singaporematcsk@nus.edu.sg
RICHARD L. WHEEDEN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USAwheeden@math.rutgers.edu
Get access

Abstract

Let $1 \le q \le p <\infty$ and let $\mathcal{C}$ be the class of all bounded convex domains $\Omega$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Following the approach in `An optimal Poincaré inequality in $L^1$ for convex domains', by G. Acosta and R. G. Durán (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (2003) 195–202), we show that the best constant $C$ in the weighted Poincaré inequality

$$ \| f - f_{av} \|_{L^q_w (\Omega)} \le C w(\Omega)^{\frac{1}{q} - \frac{1}{p}} \mbox{diam}(\Omega) \| \nabla f \|_{L^p_w(\Omega)} $$

for all $\Omega \in \mathcal{C}$, all Lipschitz continuous functions $f$ on $\Omega$, and all weights $w$ which are any positive power of a non-negative concave function on $\Omega$ is the same as the best constant for the corresponding one-dimensional situation, where $\mathcal{C}$ reduces to the class of bounded intervals. Using facts from `Sharp conditions for weighted 1-dimensional Poincaré inequalities', by S.-K. Chua and R. L. Wheeden (Indiana Math. J. 49 (2000) 143–175), we estimate the best constant. In the case $q = 1$ and $1 <\infty$, our estimate is between the best constant and twice the best constant. Furthermore, when $p = q = 1$ or $p = q = 2$, the estimate is sharp. Finally, in the case where the domains in $\mathbb{R}^n$ are further restricted to be parallelepipeds, we obtain a slightly different form of Poincaré's inequality which is better adapted to directional derivatives and the sidelengths of the parallelepipeds. We also show that this estimate is sharp for a fixed rectangle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 London Mathematical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)