Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T09:04:15.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of protein quality in calf nutrition. Problems and possibilities of milk protein substitutes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

H. Erbersdobler  and
J. Gropp
H. Erbersdobler
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierphysiologie der Universität München, 22, Veterinärstr. 13, 8 München, West Germany
J. Gropp
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierphysiologie der Universität München, 22, Veterinärstr. 13, 8 München, West Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , December 1973 , pp. 223 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

Boehnckc, E., Gropp, J. & Rieder, I. (1972). landw. Forsch. 25, 275.Google Scholar
Bonsembiante, M. & Parigi-Bini, R. (1967). A!imentaz. anim. 11, 605.Google Scholar
Brisson, G. J., Cunningham, H. M. & Haskell, S. K. (1957). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 37, 157.Google Scholar
Brüggemann, J. & Erbersdobler, El. (3968). Z. Lebensmittelunters. u.-Forsch. 137, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüggernann, J., Tiews, J., Gropp, J. & Bochrlcke, E. (1973). Wen. tieriirztl. Mschr. 60, 92.Google Scholar
Burgstaller, G. (1972). Kraftfutter 55, 300.Google Scholar
Chassin, J. (1969). Vegetable protein as a main protein source for milk substitutes in feeding suckling calves. Diplomarbeit, Faculty of Apricuiturc, Hebrew University, Rehovot.Google Scholar
Colvin, B. M. & Ramsey, H. A. (1968). J. Dairy Sci. 51, 898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colvin, B. M. & Ramsey, H. A. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52, 270.Google Scholar
Erhcrsdobler, H. (1970). Milchwissenschaft 25, 280.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. (1971). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernuhr. Futtermittelk. 28, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbersdohler, II. (1972). Proc. Int. Milkreplacer Symp. II. Zürich p. 91.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. & Dümmer, H. (1971). Z. Tierplzysiol. Tiererndhr. Futtermittelk. 28, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbersdohler, H., Gunsser, Ilona & Weber, H. (1970). Zentbl. Vet. Med. A 17, 573.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H., Weber, G. & Gunsser, llona (1972). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernäkr. Futtermittelk. 29, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. & Zucker, H. (1966). Milchwissenschaft 21, 564.Google Scholar
Fender, M. (1969). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futternrittelfc. 25, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finot, P. A. (1973). In Proteins in Human Nutrition p. 501 [Porter, J. W. G. and Rolls, N. A., editor]. London & Sew York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Finot, P. A., Bricout, J., Viani, R. & Mauron, J. (1968). Experientia 24, 1097.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E. & Shorrock, C. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedek, B. (1969). Zentbl. Bnkt. Parasitkde, I. Orginnle 209, 244.Google Scholar
Gorill, A. D. L., Thomas, J. W., tewart, W. E. & Morill, J. I. (1967). J. Nutr. 92, 86.Google Scholar
Gorill, A. D. L. & Nicholson, J. W. G. (1969) can. J. Anim. Sci. 49, 315.Google Scholar
Gropp, J. (1971). In Aktuelle Themen der Tierernährung p. 75. [Brüggemann, J. and Tiews, J., editors]. 219 Cuxhavcn, Germany: Lohmann TieGoogle Scholar
Gropp, J., Beck, H. & Erbersdobler, II. (1973). Kraftfutter 56, 324.Google Scholar
Hallgreen, B., Sjöberg, L. B. & Stelleman, J. (1973). In Proteins in Human Nutrition p. 369 [Porter, J. W. G. and Rolls, B. A., editors.] London Sr New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heyns, K., Heukeshoven, J. & Brose, K.-H. (1968). Angew. Chem. 80, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. T. & Slade, L. M. (1967). J. Dairy Sci. 50, 1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liener, I. E. (1973). In Proteins in Humm Nutrition p. 481 [Porter, J. W. G. and Rolls, B. A., editors.] London & New York: Academic Prcss.Google Scholar
Nitsan, Z., Volcani, R., Cordin, S. & Hasdad, A. (1971). J. Dairy Sci. 54, 1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. W. G. (1969). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radostits, O. M. & Bell, J. M. (1970). Can. J. Anim. 50, 405.Google Scholar
Raven, A. M. (1967). JournéesInternationale D'Information sur Les Aliments D'Allaitement Pour Veaux p. 46. Des Plaincs, III.: National Renderers Association.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. (1970). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 21, 346.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. & Wynn, C. F. (1971). Proc Nutr. Soc. 30, 75A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagari, H. & Roy, J. H. B. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 763.Google Scholar
van Adrichem, P. W. M. (1967). X Tierphysiol. Tirrernähr. Futtermittelk. 23, 34.Google Scholar
van Hellemond, K. K. (1967). Rrp. ILOB, Wageningen, no. 183.Google Scholar
van Loen, A. & Balfoort, A. J. M. (1968). Mühleu. Mischfuttertechnik 110, 105.Google Scholar
van Weerden, E. J. (1970). Rep. ILOB, Wageningen, no. 254.Google Scholar
van Weerden, E. J. & van Hellemond, K. K. (1967). Landbourwk. Tijdschr., 'S-Grav. 79, 327.Google Scholar
Weiss, E., Baur, P. & Schicfcr, B. (1967). Mitt. Tierknlt. 106, 18.Google Scholar
Zucker, H., Erbersdobler, H. & Gropp, J. (1968). Kraftfutter 51, 584.Google Scholar
Zucker, H., Gropp, J., Giesslcr, H. & Barry, M. O. (1969). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 25, 381.Google Scholar