Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:02:02.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of habitual calcium intake on dietary vitamin D requirements in adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2013

A. Hayes
Affiliation:
Vitamin D Research Group, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
K. M. Seamans
Affiliation:
Vitamin D Research Group, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
M. Kiely
Affiliation:
Vitamin D Research Group, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
K. D. Cashman
Affiliation:
Vitamin D Research Group, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

If dietary calcium intake is low and serum calcium concentrations decrease, the compensatory metabolic response is the accelerated conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (via parathyroid hormone), so as to normalize serum calcium levels ( 1 ). These interactions between vitamin D and calcium may have implications for the regulation of 25(OH)D production and its catabolism, and consequently for the dietary vitamin D requirement ( Reference Clements, Johnson and Fraser 2 ). While highlighted as a significant knowledge gap by the North American Institute of Medicine in their recent DRI report for vitamin D and calcium ( 1 ), to date this hypothesis has only received limited attention in human studies. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis using relevant data from our previously published vitamin D intervention studies in 20–40 y olds ( Reference Cashman, Hill and Lucey 3 ) and 64+ y olds ( Reference Cashman, Wallace and Horigan 4 ) as well as an updated version of our recent meta-regression analysis ( Reference Cashman, Fitzgerald and Kiely 5 ), all of which up to now have not included dietary calcium intake as a possible additional determinant of vitamin D requirements.

Within the datasets from our two vitamin D intervention studies, baseline serum 25(OH)D and response of serum 25(OH)D to vitamin D3 intervention (0, 5, 10 or 15 μ/d) over winter months were stratified by<or ⩾three different cut-offs for dietary calcium intake (550, 700 and 800 mg/d), representing EU estimated average requirement (EAR), UK reference nutrient intake and US EAR for calcium, respectively). Students' paired and unpaired t-tests were used to test differences at baseline and response of serum 25(OH)D to intervention in groups stratified according to each cut-off for calcium intake, respectively. Regression models were also run to account for possible confounding effects of sex, age, BMI, habitual vitamin D intake and study centre. In the meta-regression analysis, two new studies published since our original meta-regression in 2011( Reference Cashman, Fitzgerald and Kiely 5 ) were included and habitual calcium intake was reported in each of the 13 studies.

In the meta-regression approach, the relationship between serum 25(OH)D and total vitamin D intake were not significantly different (P>0.05) when studies were stratified on the basis of habitual group mean calcium intakes<or ⩾∼1000 mg/d. Data from our own two intervention studies suggest that while baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly lower (P<0.05) in the<700 mg/d calcium intakes groups compared to the>700 mg/d in the 64+ y olds, these differences disappeared when data was adjusted for the aforementioned confounding factors. There were no other significant differences (P>0.05) in baseline serum 25(OH)D in 20–40 y olds or 64+ y olds when stratified by habitual calcium intake. Upon stratification on the basis of <or ⩾three selected dietary calcium intake cut-offs, there was no significant difference in the response of serum 25(OH)D to vitamin D intervention over winter in the 20–40 y olds. Likewise, there was no significant difference in response of serum 25(OH)D to vitamin D intervention in 64 y olds stratified by</>550 mg/d or</>800 mg/d but there were lower responses to 5 μ/d (12.2 nmol/L; P=0.007), 10 μ/d (14.6 nmol/L; P=0.008), and 15 μ/d (9.4 nmol/L; P=0.097) in those 64+ y olds with calcium intakes<compared to ⩾700 mg/d. Calcium intake</>700 mg/d remained a significant predictor (P=0.041) of the change in serum 25(OH)D over winter in the regression models that accounted for treatment but also the aforementioned confounding factors.

In conclusion, post-hoc analysis seems to suggest that a habitual calcium intake less than 700 mg/d may lead to a more blunted response of winter serum 25(OH)D to increased vitamin D intake in older adults. This may have implications for the dietary vitamin D requirement. *The two vitamin D intervention studies were collaborative studies with the University of Ulster, Coleraine. **Current analysis supported by the Department of Health, England.

References

1. Institute of Medicine (2011) Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
2. Clements, MR, Johnson, L, Fraser, DR et al. (1987) A new mechanism for induced vitamin D deficiency in calcium deprivation. Nature 325, 6265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Cashman, KD, Hill, TR, Lucey, AJ et al. (2008) Estimation of the dietary requirement for vitamin D in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 1535–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Cashman, KD, Wallace, JMW, Horigan, G, et al. (2009) Estimation of the dietary requirement for vitamin D in free-living adults ⩾64 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 13661374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Cashman, KD, Fitzgerald, AP, Kiely, M, et al. (2011) A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of the vitamin D intake-serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D relationship to inform European recommendations. Br J Nutr 106, 1638–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed