Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:21:57.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring healthcare professionals’ perceptions of diet and exercise as a form of symptom management in Parkinson’s Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2024

A. Calladine
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
S. Coe
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
A. Daly
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
S. Lawrie
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder in which dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra, a region of the brain that controls movement, are lost over time (1). This results in motor symptoms, such as bradykinesia, and non-motor symptoms such as depression (2). Evidence- based resources and programmes utilising exercise for symptom management are widely available (3). However, despite emerging evidence showing that diet changes can improve quality of life and reduce disease severity (4), there are few dietary guidelines and programmes. This study aims to address a current literature gap in qualitative studies assessing the opinions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards diet and exercise in PD care, and to identify barriers and facilitators of this in care.

A qualitative design was used to assess the views and beliefs of HCPs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone, using a topic guide developed by the research team, consisting of 20 questions. The data were analysed using the six-phase process of Reflexive Thematic analysis to determine key themes in the data (5).

Five HCPs participated in this study. One main theme and two subthemes were identified. The main theme was that provisions of care and dietary advice are limited by a lack of knowledge of evidence- based, PD-specific, dietary guidelines. Subtheme 1 was that evidence-based exercise guidelines have been important facilitators in supporting care provision. Subtheme 2 was that lack of dietary guidance has been a barrier to optimum care provision and self-efficacy of HCPs.

HCPs were less likely to discuss diet, due to barriers including lack of available resources or knowledge thereof, self-efficacy to recommend dietary changes, time constraints in the clinic, and less well-established referral pathways for dietitians. HCPs were unaware of the influence of diet in PD treatment, despite diet’s impact on symptoms being discussed in clinic. However, HCPs agreed that evidence-based resources would benefit HCPs’ practice, to improve symptom severity and nutritional status of patients. Exercise was more likely to be discussed, as evidence-based guidelines and empirical understanding meant HCPs were more aware of the beneficial effects on symptoms.

While limited by small numbers, these findings suggest that a lack of knowledge, low self-efficacy, and time pressures mean that patients may not receive dietary guidelines which may be beneficial to their care. Self-efficacy of HCPs should be improved through PD-specific nutritional education, development and dissemination of PD-specific nutrition guidelines and resources. Future research should aim to determine the effectiveness of relevant dietary strategies’ in managing and caring for PD.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

McGregor MM & Nelson AB (2019) Neuron 101(6), 1042–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano G, Niccolini F, Fusar-Poli P et al. (2017) Annals Neurol 81(2), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng Y, Yang S, Tan Z et al. (2020) Life Sci 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongun N (2018) PLoS One 13(10), e0205100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun V & Clarke V (2022) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide, London, Sage PublishingGoogle Scholar