Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:55:56.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intake of nutrients from pasture by poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2007

Andrew Walker*
Affiliation:
ADAS Gleadthorpe, Meden Vale, Mansfield, Notts. NG20 9PF, UK
Sue Gordon
Affiliation:
ADAS Gleadthorpe, Meden Vale, Mansfield, Notts. NG20 9PF, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Mr A. Walker, fax +44 1623 844472, andrew.walker@ADAS.co.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

EC legislation requires the land to which free-range poultry have access to be ‘mainly covered with vegetation’, but the nature of this vegetation is not specified. In practice, most free-range land will be grass pasture. Modern poultry nutrition is a highly-developed science, and to house poultry in an environment in which they may consume an unknown quantity of vegetation, itself of unknown nutritive value, introduces uncertainty into a predictable system. In recent years the contribution of grazing to the nutrition of the birds has been considered negligible. However, birds on range appear to ingest a little grass, and therefore the quality of the pasture may affect their performance. If poultry consumed largely grass, then the nutritional value derived from it would be relatively poor. The grass would constitute a source of energy and fibre, but would make little contribution in terms of protein. The likely approach that poultry nutritionists would take is a precautionary one. They would need to know the full nutritive value of the pasture and the likely quantitative intake by the birds, and they would then make adjustments to feed formulations at what they considered to be a ‘safe’ level, in order to minimise the risks of impairing performance. A small (0–5) percentage contribution is probably the most that could be achieved, but given that feed accounts for about 70% of the variable costs of poultry production, such a contribution is economically important.

Type
Symposium on ‘Nutrition of farm animals outdoors’
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2003

References

Adams, C (1999) Nutricines Food Components in Health and Nutritions. Nottingham: Nottingham University PressGoogle Scholar
Bassler, A, Ciszuk, P & Sjelin, K (1999) Management of laying hens in mobile houses – a review of experiences. In Ecological Animal Husbandry in the Nordic Countries Proceedings of NJF Seminar no. 303, pp. 4550 [Hermansen, JE, Lund, VV, Thuen, E, editors]. Horsens, Denmark: Danish Research Centre for Organic FarmingGoogle Scholar
Brockman, JS (1995) Grassland. In The Agricultural Notebook, 19th ed. 194226 [Soffe, RJ, editors]. Oxford: Blackwell ScienceGoogle Scholar
Clark, MS & Gage, SH (1996) The effects of domestic chickens and geese on insect pests and weeds in an agroecosystem. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 11, 3947Google Scholar
Coultate, TP (1996) Food. The Chemistry of its Components. Cambridge: Royal Society of ChemistryGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P, Edwards, RA, Greenhalgh, JFD & Morgan, CA (1995) Animal Nutrition. Harlow, Essex: Longman Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (2001) Agriculture in the United Kingdom 2000. London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Poultry, World (1959) The Poultry Handbook no 105 London: Reed ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Robinson, L (1948) Modern Poultry Husbandry. London: Crosby LockwoodGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A (1952) The Complete Poultryman. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar