Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:31:53.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is a ‘prudent’ pattern of eating in pregnancy associated with adiposity in early childhood? Findings from the Southampton Women's Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2009

Sian Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Sarah Crozier
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Nick Harvey
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Hazel Inskip
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Keith Godfrey
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Cyrus Cooper
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Experimental studies provide clear evidence that a number of different types of dietary manipulation in pregnancy alter fetal development, changing body composition and adiposity in the offspring. Proposed mechanisms include alterations to appetite regulation resulting in hyperphagia in the offspring and an increased preference for high-fat or other energy-dense foods(Reference Bayol, Farrington and Stickland1). Much less is known about human pregnancy and the extent to which qualitative variations in maternal diet in pregnancy may influence body composition of the offspring.

The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between quality of the maternal diet in pregnancy and fat mass determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the age of 4 years, in a large general-population sample of mothers and children in the Southampton Women's Survey (SWS). The SWS is a study of 12 583 non-pregnant women aged 20–34 years resident in the city of Southampton, UK. SWS women who become pregnant are followed up in early (EP) and late (LP) pregnancy, when diet is assessed by FFQ(Reference Robinson, Godfrey, Osmond, Cox and Barker2). As an index of diet quality individual's scores were used for a principal component analysis-defined dietary pattern, the ‘prudent’ pattern of diet, in EP and LP(Reference Crozier, Inskip, Godfrey and Robinson3). High prudent-diet scores indicate a diet characterised by high consumption of fruit and vegetables, wholemeal bread, rice and pasta, while low scores indicate a diet characterised by high consumption of chips, white bread, red and processed meat, full-fat dairy products, sugar and soft drinks. A total of 556 children born between 1999 and 2003 were followed up at 4 years for DXA assessment of body composition. Fat mass was adjusted for the influence of child's height by calculating a fat mass index (total fat mass (kg)/height (m)2)(Reference Wells and Cole4). The fat mass index was independent of height at 4 years (P=0.67).

Prudent-diet score in EP and LP was inversely related to fat mass (P=0.033 and P=0.018 respectively) and to the fat mass index (P=0.018 and P=0.005 respectively), but BMI at 4 years was not related to prudent-diet score in pregnancy. Prudent-diet score in pregnancy was positively associated with the length of time the child was breast-fed in infancy (r 0.38 and r 0.40 for EP and LP respectively). After taking account of breast-feeding duration there were no longer independent relationships between prudent-diet score in EP or LP and fat mass or fat mass index at 4 years.

The data suggest that variations in infant diet may have a greater impact on adiposity in early childhood than maternal diet in pregnancy. No evidence was found of independent effects of qualitative variations in maternal diet in pregnancy on offspring adiposity in early childhood.

References

1. Bayol, SA, Farrington, SJ & Stickland, NC (2007) Br J Nutr 98, 843851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Robinson, S, Godfrey, K, Osmond, C, Cox, V & Barker, D (1996) Eur J Clin Nutr 50, 302308.Google Scholar
3. Crozier, SR, Inskip, HM, Godfrey, KM & Robinson, SM (2008) Br J Nutr 99, 869875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Wells, JC, Cole, TJ & ALSPAC Study Team (2002) Int J Obes (Lond) 26, 947952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar