Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:23:35.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Manipulation of fibre digestion in the rumen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on ‘Fibre digestion in farm livestock’
Copyright
The Nutrition Society

References

Adebowale, E. A., Ørskov, E. R. & Hotten, P. M. (1989). Rumen degradation of straw. 8. Effect of alkaline hydrogen peroxide on degradation of straw using either sodium hydroxide or gaseous ammeous ammonia as source of alkali. Animal production 48, 553559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainto, S. J., Plumb, V. E., Capper, B. S. & Juliano, B. O. (1987). Botanical composition, chemical analysis and cellulase solubilty of rice straw from different varieties. Anmal production 44, 481 Abstr.Google Scholar
Boon, J. J. (1984). An introduction to pyrolysis mass spectrometry of lignocellulosic material: case studies on barley straw, corn stem and agropyron. In physicochemical Characterization of plant Residues for Industrial and Animal Use, pp. 2549 [Chesson, A. and Ørskov, E. R, editors]. London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Capper, B. S. (1990). Factors influencing the nutritive value of barley straw for ruminants. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Chenost, M., Grenet, E. Demarquilly, C. & Jarrige, R. (1970). The use of the nylon bag techniquc for the study of forage digestio. In the rumen and for predicting feed value. Proceedings of the 11th International Grassland Congress, Surfers Paradise, pp. 697701. st Lucia. Australia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Chesson, A. (1981). Effects of Sodium hydroxide on cereal straws in relation to the cnhanced degradation of structural polysaccharides by rumen microorganisms. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 745758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, S. T. M., Lee, N. H. & Ørskov, E. R. (1984). Digestion and unilization of straw. 2. Effect of different supplements on the digestion of ammonia-trcated straw. Animal Production 38, 7581.Google Scholar
Flint, H. J., McPherson, C. A. & Bisset, J. (1989). Molecular cloning of genes from Rumi;nococcus flavefaciens encoding xylanase and β(1,3–1–4) glucanasc activities. Applied Environmental Microbiology 55, 12301233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, H. J. M. (1985). Studies on the mechanism of alkaline peroxide delignification of agricultural residues. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 27, 225231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grenet, E. (1989). Electron microscopy and histology of lignocellulase related to biodegradation. In Physicochemical Characterization of Plant Residues for Industrial and Animal Use. pp. 6579 [Chesson, A and Ørskov, E. R, editors]. London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Kernan, J. A., Coxworth, E. C., Crowle, W. L. & Spurr, D. T. (1984). The nutritional value of crop residue components from severl wheat cultivars growth at different fertiliser levels. Animal Feed science and Technology 11, 301311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. (1981). A revused model for the estimation of protein degradbility in the rumen. Journal of Agricultrural Science. Cambridge 96, 251252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, J. B. & Wood, J. T. (1982). The growth and development of the alimentary tract in Asiatic swamp buffalo and Zebu cattle. Journal of Agricultural science, Cambridge 98, 493498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mould, F. I., Saadullah, M., Haquc, M., Davis, C., Dolberg, F. & Ørskov, E. R. (1982). Investigation of some of the physiological factors influencing intake and digestion of rice straw by native cattle of Bangladesh Tropical Animal Production 7, 174181.Google Scholar
Nakshima, Y. & Ørskov, E. R. (1989). Rumen degradation of straw. 7. Effects of chemical pre-treatment and addition of proparation. Animal Production 48, 543551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakashima, Y. & Ørskov, E. R. (1990). Rumen degradation of straw, 9. Effect of cellulase and ammonia treatment on different varieties of rice straws and their botanical fractions. Animal Production 50, 309317.Google Scholar
Nakashima, Y., Ørskov, E. R., Hotten, P. M., Ambo, K. & Takase, Y. (1988). Rumen degradation of straw. 6. Effect of polysaccharidase enzymes on degradation echaracteristics of ensiled rice straw. Animal Production 47, 421427.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1989). Recent advance in eveluation of roughages as feeds for ruminants. In Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 1989, pp. 102108 [Farrell, D. J, editor]. Armidale: NSW: Department of Biochemistry. Microbiology and Nutrition, University of New England.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Flint, H. J. (1991). Manipulation of rumen microbes or feed resources as methods of improving feed utilization. International Conference on the Application of Biotechnology to Livestock in Developing Countries. Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh (In the Press).Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, i. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation mcasurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science. Cambridge. 92, 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Ojwang, I. & Reid, G. W. (1988 a). A study on consistency of differences between cows in rumen outflow rate of fibrous particles and other substrates and consequences for digestibility and intake of roughages. Animal Production 47, 4551.Google Scholar
Ørkov, E. R., Reid, G. W. & Kay, M. (1988 b). Prediction of intake by cattle from degradation characteristies of roughages. Animal Production 46, 2934.Google Scholar
Pesree, G. R. (1983). Variability in composition and nutritive value of cereal straws. In Feed Information and Animal Production. pp. 417420 [Robards, G. E and Packham, R. G, editors]. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Ramanzin, M., Ørskov, E. R. & Tuah, A. K. (1986). Rumen degradation of straw. 2. Botanical fractions of straw from two barley cultivars. Animal Production 43, 271278.Google Scholar
Rexen, F. & Munck, L. (1984). Cereal Crops for Industrial Use in Europe. The Commission of European Communities. EUR 9617EN, Copenhagen: Carlsberg Research Centre.Google Scholar
Shand, W. J., Ørskov, E. R. & Morrice, L. A. F. (1988). Rumen degradation of straw. 5. Botanical fractions and degradability of different varieties varieties of oat and wheat straws. Anmal Production 47, 387392.Google Scholar
Silva, A. T., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Ørskov, E. R. (1989). Influence of ammonia treatment and supplementation on the intake, digestibility and weight gain of sheep and cattle on barley straw diets, Animal Production 48, 99108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D., Hotten, P. m. & Ørskov, E. R. (1991). Rumen degradation of straw. Effect of xylanase alone and in compination with cellulase and alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment on different varieties of straw and their botanical fractins (In the Press).Google Scholar
Stewart, C. S., Flint, H. J. & Nekreb, F. V. (1991). Degradation of plant cell wall polymers by the anaerobic rumen bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens. In CEC Cost Bis Symposium Bologna (In the Press).Google Scholar
Sundstøl, F. (1988). Improvement of poor quality forages and roughages. In Feed Science 1988, pp. 257273 [Ørskov, E. R, editor]. World Animal Science B4. Amsterdam: Elsevier World Series.Google Scholar
Tuah, A. K., Lufadeju, E. & Ørskov, E. R. (1986). Rumen degradation of straw. 1. Untreated and ammonia-treated barley, oat and wheat straw varieties and triticale straw. Animal Production 43, 261269.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (1989). Identification of slowly metabolized sugars and sugar derivatives that could be used to establish new or modified species in the rumen. Current Microbiology 19, 271274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
weyreter, H. & Engelhardt, W. V. (1984). Adaptation of Heidschnucken, Merino and Blackhead sheep to a fibrous roughage diet of poor quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 152153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar