Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:59:58.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practice and problems with gastrostomies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2007

Gill McHattie
Gill McHattie
Affiliation:
Southern General Hospital, South Glasgow University Hospitals Division, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The development of gastrostomy placement has been an important technological advance in the enteral-access field. However, its rapid growth in popularity could be viewed as problematic. The endoscopist or intervention radiologist can no longer act as a technician but requires to follow-up this group of patients in order to determine outcomes that will inform future practice. There has been emphasis on the importance of the multidisciplinary team in informing and assessing patients referred for gastrostomy insertion. Communication between all the professionals caring for a patient and between the carers and the patient allows information to be collated that will determine the benefits and burdens of long-term gastrostomy feeding. At present much of the published experience is limited to the acute care setting. The incidence of complications varies, depending on the investigator's definition of complication and the diagnosis of the patient group. Many reported studies are retrospective, which puts limitations on documentation. Increasing numbers of patients with diverse needs are now being discharged into the community with gastrostomy tubes in place. Whilst the hospital should ensure that written protocols are provided and that all carers involved should have adequate training, it is not unusual for patients to receive mixed messages from the different care teams responsible for their care. In South Glasgow NHS Hospital Division key members of all teams caring for these patients (acute care, community district nurses, learning disabilities team, physical disabilities team and commercial homecare companies) meet regularly to discuss equipment and protocols. The members of this group feel that this approach has improved communication, standardised practice and reduced complications by providing a service that delivers artificial nutrition support but is primarily suited to the patient's disease process.

Keywords

GastrostomyCommunicationClinical governance
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , August 2005 , pp. 335 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2005

References

Bowling, TE (2002) UK PEG Service: Are we really practising in the patients' best interests Clinical Nutrition Update 7 6–8 Google Scholar
British Society of Gastroenterology (1996) Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. London: British Society of GastroenterologyGoogle Scholar
DeLegge, MH (2003a) Prevention and Management of Complications from Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Wellesley, MA: UpToDate.Google Scholar
DeLegge, MH (2003b) PEG Placement: Justifying the Intervention. Wellesley, MA: UpToDate.Google Scholar
Gauderer, MWL (2002) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and the evolution of contemporary long-term access. Clinical Nutrition 21, 103–110 Google Scholar
Glencorse, C, Meadows, N &, Holden, C (editors) (2003) BANS Report: Trends in Artificial Nutrition Support in the UK between 1996 and 2002. Reddich, Worcs.: BAPEN.Google Scholar
Lee, JH, Machtay, M, Unger, LD, Weinstein, GS, Weber, RS, Chalian, AA, Rosenthal, DI (1998) Prophylactic gastrostomy tubes in patients undergoing intensive irradiation for cancer of the head and neck. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 124, 871–875 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leigh, PN, Abrahams, S, Al-Chalabi, A, Ampong, M-A, Goldstein, LH, Johnson, J et al. . (2003) The management of motor neurone disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 74, 32–47 Google Scholar
Medicines and Health care Products Regulatory Agency(2004) Safety Action Notice SAN(SC)04/03-11 Feb 2004. Misuse or Modification of Medical Devices/Non-medical Products: Safety, Suitability and Effectiveness Issues London Department of HealthGoogle Scholar
Muller, P, Lindberg, CG, Zilling, T (1999) Gastrostomy by various techniques: evaluation of indications, outcome and complications. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 10, 1050–1054 Google Scholar
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (2004) Scoping our practice. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2004report/index.htm Google Scholar
Scally, G, Donaldson, LJ (1998) British Medical Journal 317, 61–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scolapio, JS, Spangler, PR, Romano, MM, McLaughlin, MP, Salassa, JR (2001) Prophylactic placement of gastrostomy feeding tubes before radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: is it worthwhile. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 33, 215–217 Google Scholar
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2004) Management of Patients with Stroke: Identification and Management of Dysphagia. Clinical Guideline no. 78. Edinburgh: Royal College of Physicians; available at http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign78.pdf Google Scholar
Silk, DBA (editor)(1994) Organisation of Nutritional Support in Hospitals Silk DBA Reddich, Worcs. BAPENGoogle Scholar
Stroud, M, Duncan, H, Nightingale, J (2003) Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut 52 vii1 – vii12 Suppl. 7 Google Scholar
Tschudin, V (2003) Ethics in Nursing: The Caring Relationship 3rd ed Edinburgh Butterworth HeinemanGoogle Scholar
Tucker, AT, Gourin, CG, Ghegan, MD, Porubsky, ES, Martindale, RG, Terris, DJ (2003) ‘Push’ versus ‘pull’ percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 113, 1898–1902 Google Scholar
Tyldesley, S, Sheehan, F, Munk, P, Tsang, V, Skarsgard, D, Bowman, C, Hobenshield, SE (1996) The use of radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 36, 1205–1209 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed