Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:17:14.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The prevalence and costs of obesity in the EU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2007

James Fry*
Affiliation:
LMC International, 14-16 George Street, Oxford, OX1 2AF, UK
Willa Finley
Affiliation:
LMC International, 1841 Broadway, New York, NY, 10023, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Dr James Fry, fax +44 1865 791 739, jfry@Lmc.co.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present paper reports on results obtained as part of the economics module of the LIPGENE project. It reviews recent trends in obesity in the fifteen member states of the EU (the member states before enlargement in 2004) and concludes that in 2002 for both adult men and women at least half the fifteen member states of the EU had obesity levels of >20%. In the same year the total direct and indirect annual costs of obesity in the fifteen member states of the EU were euro32 800×106. The provision of ‘healthy’ foods with an adapted lipid profile provides one means of mitigating the impact of obesity. However, there are extra costs associated with the supply of such foods, via additional costs of food ingredients, identity preservation costs for premium-value food products and the penalties caused by the inability to exploit economies of scale. The limited scale of the markets for healthy foods is caused by their high selling prices. Also presented is an analysis of the costs of subsidising, throughout the EU, ingredients that improve the fatty acid profile of beef, eggs, poultry meat and low-fat spreads, so that healthier versions of these products sell at the same price as traditional alternatives. The total costs of such subsidies for these four food products would have been euro10×109/year in 2002, which was 30% of the direct and indirect costs of obesity.

Type
Meeting Report
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2005

References

American Obesity Association (2002) Costs of obesity. http://www.obesity.org/treatment/cost.shtml Google Scholar
Buttriss, J, Nugent, A (2005) LIPGENE: an integrated approach to tackling the metabolic syndrome. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 64, 345347 Google Scholar
Comptroller and Auditor General (2001) Tackling Obesity in England London Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Darling, T (2001) Commercial Beef Niche Market Alternatives. Agriculture Business Profiles Edmonton, Alberta Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Fanatico, A, Redhage, D (2002) Growing Your Range Poultry Business Fayetteville, AR National Center for Appropriate TechnologyGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, EA, Fiebelkorn, IC &, Wang, G (2003) National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: how much, and who's paying? Health Affairs W3:219226. http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w3.219v1/DC1 Google Scholar
Food Standards Agency Food Standards Agency (2004) Notification Dossier: Phytosterols and their esters for use as an ingredient in a range of food applications. Cognis Deutschland GmbH. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/Cognis.pdf Google Scholar
Maynard, LJ, Franklin, ST (2003) Functional foods as a value-added strategy: The commercial potential of ‘cancer-fighting’ dairy products. Review of Agricultural Economics 25, 316331 Google Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among adults 1999 – 2002 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/obese/obse99.htm Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2004) OECD health data 2004. Overweight or obese population (updated 8 February 2004). www.irdes.fr/ecosante/OCDE/814010.html Google Scholar
Wolf, AM, Colditz, GA (1998) Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obesity Research 6, 97106 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed