Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:34:36.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An investigation of patients' attitudes to ECT by means of Q-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

P. N. Cowley*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester
*
1 Address for correspondence: Dr P. N. Cowley, Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester.

Synopsis

This paper is a preliminary investigation into the application of Q-analysis in clinical psychiatry, Q-analysis is used to describe the interrelationships of attitudes that two groups of patients were observed to hold towards ECT. The data were collected as part of the Leicestershire ECT trial. One group comprised 96 patients who consented to enter the trial. The other group was formed by 23 patients who refused to participate in the trial, but who agreed to be interviewed so that their attitudes could be assessed.

The method of applying Q-analysis is described, and the resultant outputs for the two groups are discussed. The presence of insight, a subjective need for treatment and trust in ECT were significant features in the 96 patients who agreed to enter the trial. However, among this group there was a subset of patients who were very anxious and who had little desire to receive ECT or trust in it. Among the 23 patients who refused to participate in the trial two main viewpoints could be discerned. First, there was a subgroup who seemed accurately to assess their need for treatment, had insight and trust in ECT as well as specifically wanting to receive it. The second was composed of patients who were very apprehensive, did not want ECT and generally were unhappy about being in hospital. In both groups it was considered that level of knowledge was relatively unimportant in the formation of attitudes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkin, R. H. (1974). Mathematical Structure in Human Affairs. Heinemann Educational Books: London.Google Scholar
Atkin, R. H. (1977). Combinatorial Connectivities in Social Systems. Birkhauser: Basle.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, R. H. (1978). Q-analysis: a hard language for the social sciences. Futures 12, 492499.Google Scholar
Atkin, R. H. (1981). Multidimensional man. Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Brandon, S., Cowley, P., McDonald, C., Neville, P., Palmer, R. & Wellstood-Eason, S. (1984). Electroconvulsive therapy: results in depressive illness from the Leicestershire trial. British Medical Journal 288, 2225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flemming, U. (1981). Structure in bungalow plans. Environment and Planning B. 8, 393404.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. P. L. & Kendell, R. E. (1980). ECT 1 patients' experiences and attitudes. British Journal of Psychiatry 137, 816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, P. (1981). Electrical power failure. Environment and Planning B 8, 405417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J., Barraclough, B. M. & Reeve, W. (1981). Are patients shocked by ECT? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 74, 283285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, E. M. & Johnson, J. H. (1981). A structural investigation in design education. Environment and Planning B 8, 435448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, C. R., Constantopoulos, C. & Bevans, H. G. (1982). Types of countertransference identified by Q-analysis. British Journal of Medical Psychology 55, 187201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed