Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:54:48.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boris G. Mirkin Group Choice. Translated by Yelena Oliker. Edited and introduced by Peter C. Fishburn. Washington, D. C.: V. H. Winston, 1979. pp. xxx + 252. $22.50.

Review products

Boris G. Mirkin Group Choice. Translated by Yelena Oliker. Edited and introduced by Peter C. Fishburn. Washington, D. C.: V. H. Winston, 1979. pp. xxx + 252. $22.50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Phipps Arabie
Phipps Arabie*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , September 1982 , pp. 361 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arabie, P., & Boorman, S. A. Multidimensional scaling of measures of distance between partitions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1973, 10, 148–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. D. Impact scaling: Theory, mathematical model, and estimation procedures. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 1977, 21, 513–517.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via anN-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 283–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, C. H. A theory of data, 1964, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H., & Smith, J. E. K. On the detection of structure and developmental processes. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. Intransitive indifference in preference theory: A survey. Operations Research, 1970, 18, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, O. Comparing classifications by use of the symmetric class difference. In Gordesch, J. & Maeze, P. (Eds.), Proceedings in computational statistics. Würzburg: Physica Verlag. 1976, 84–96.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. Order from indifference. Problems and projects, 1972, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Green, B. F. Jr. The computer revolution in psychometrics. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 437–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, M. O. Correspondence analysis: A neglected multivariate method. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C, Applied Statistics, 1974, 23, 340–354.Google Scholar
Hubert, L. J. Some applications of graph theory and related non-metric techniques to problems of approximate seriation: The case of symmetric proximity measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1974, 27, 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubert, L. J. Seriation using asymmetric proximity measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1976, 29, 32–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. R. Constructive critique of a hierarchical prioritization scheme employing paired comparisons. IEEE Proceedings of International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, 1980, 373–378.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. R., Beine, W. B., & Wang, T. J. Right-left asymmetry in an eigenvector ranking procedure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1979, 19, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemeny, J. G., & Snell, J. L. Mathematical models in the social sciences, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Monjardet, B. Metrics on partially ordered sets—a survey. Discrete Mathematics, 1981, 35, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, F. S. On nontransitive indifference. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1970, 7, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, F. S. Indifference and seriation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1979, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saaty, T. L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15, 234–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. Collective choice and social welfare, 1970, San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., & Michener, C. D. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 1958, 38, 1409–1438.Google Scholar
Weeks, J. R., & Bogart, K. P. Consensus signed digraphs. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1979, 36, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubin, J. A technique for measuring likemindedness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1938, 33, 508–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar