Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Snijders, Tom A.B.
1990.
Testing for change in a digraph at two time points.
Social Networks,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
359.
Zeggelink, Evelien
1994.
Dynamics of structure: an individual oriented approach ∗.
Social Networks,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
295.
Banks, David L.
and
Carley, Kathleen M.
1996.
Models for network evolution.
The Journal of Mathematical Sociology,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
173.
Skvoretz, John
Faust, Katherine
and
Fararo, Thomas J.
1996.
Social structure, networks, and E‐state structuralism models.
The Journal of Mathematical Sociology,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
57.
Tiit, E.-M.
and
Käärik, E.
1996.
COMPSTAT.
p.
471.
Wasserman, Stanley
and
Pattison, Philippa
1996.
Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 3,
p.
401.
Snijders, Tom A.B.
1996.
Stochastic actor‐oriented models for network change.
The Journal of Mathematical Sociology,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
149.
Karlberg, Martin
1997.
Testing transitivity in graphs.
Social Networks,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 4,
p.
325.
Bonacich, Phillip
Oliver, Amalya
and
Snijders, Tom A.B.
1998.
Controlling for size in centrality scores.
Social Networks,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
135.
Anderson, Brigham S
Butts, Carter
and
Carley, Kathleen
1999.
The interaction of size and density with graph-level indices.
Social Networks,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
239.
Odland, Arvid
and
Birks, H. J. B.
1999.
The altitudinal gradient of vascular plant richness in Aurland, western Norway.
Ecography,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 5,
p.
548.
Odland, Arvid
and
Birks, H. J. B.
1999.
The altitudinal gradient of vascular plant richness in Aurland, western Norway.
Ecography,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 5,
p.
548.
Karlberg, Martin
1999.
7. Testing Transitivity in Digraphs.
Sociological Methodology,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 1,
p.
225.
Pattison, Philippa
Wasserman, Stanley
Robins, Garry
and
Kanfer, Alaina Michaelson
2000.
Statistical Evaluation of Algebraic Constraints for Social Networks.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 4,
p.
536.
Wasserman, Stanley
and
Pattison, Philippa
2000.
Data Analysis, Classification, and Related Methods.
p.
285.
Mandel, Micha
2000.
Measuring tendency towards mutuality in a social network.
Social Networks,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
285.
Roberts, John M
2000.
Simple methods for simulating sociomatrices with given marginal totals.
Social Networks,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 3,
p.
273.
Pattison, P.
and
Wasserman, S.
2001.
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
p.
14375.
Roberts, John M
2002.
Connections between A.K. Romney’s analyses of endogamy and other developments in log-linear models and network analysis.
Social Networks,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
185.
King, Oliver D.
2004.
Comment on “Subgraphs in random networks”.
Physical Review E,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 5,