Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:58:47.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A General Theory of Learning and Conditioning: Part I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Walter Pitts
Walter Pitts*
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the first of two parts in which a general mathematical theory of non-symbolic learning and conditioning is constructed, the sections of the theory dealing with non-symbolic learning and conditioning are presented, and a number of its qualitative implications are compared with available experimental results. In general, the agreement is found to be rather close.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1943 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © 1943 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bass, N. J. Hull, C. L. The irradiation of a tactile conditioned reflex in man. J. comp. Psychol., 1934, 17, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogden, W. C. and Culler, E. Experimental extinction of higher order responses. Amer. J. Psychol., 1935, 47, 663–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogden, W. C., Lippman, E. A., and Culler, E. The role of incentive in conditioning and extinction. Amer. J. Psychol., 1938, 51, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunswik, E. S. Probability as a determiner of rat behavior. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 75, 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugelski, R. Extinction with and without sub-goal reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1940, 26, 121–133.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. A. The interrelations of two measures of conditioning in man. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 22, 244–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. A. and Hilgard, E. R. Individual differences in ease of conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1931, 14, 561–571.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. Testability and meaning. Phil. of Sci., 1935, 3, 419–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. Logical foundations of the unity of science. Int. Encyc. of Unified Sci., 1939, 1(1), 42–62.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. Adaptation of the galvanic skin response to auditory stimuli. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 22, 244–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courant, R. and Hilbert, D. Methoden der Mathematischen Physik. Bd. 1., Berlin: Julius Springer, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellson, D. G. Spontaneous recovery of the galvanic skin response as a function of the recovery interval. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 25, 586–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, G. and Culler, E. The relation of forgetting to experimental extinction. Amer. J. Psychol., 1933, 47, 656–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullikson, H. Studies of transfer of responses: I. Relative versus absolute factors in the discrimination of size by the white rat. J. genet. Psychol., 1932, 40, 37–51.Google Scholar
Gullikson, H. A rational equation of the learning curve based on Thorndike's law of effect. J. gen. Psychol., 1934, 11, 395–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullikson, H. and Wolfle, D. L. A theory of learning and transfer. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 127–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. An algebraic analysis of conditioned discrimination in man. Psychol. Rev., 1938, 45, 472–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. and Marquis, D. G. Conditioning and learning, New York: D. Appleton-Century Company, 1940.Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. and Marquis, D. G. The course of acquisition and retention of conditioned eyelid responses in man. J. exp. Psychol., 1936, 19, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. and Humphries, L. G. The retention of conditioned discrimination in man. J. gen. Psychol., 1938, 19, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. and Marquis, D. G. Acquisition, extinction, and retention of conditioned eyelid responses to light in dogs. J. comp. Psychol., 1935, 19, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, A. P. A new method for determining the absolute affective value of a series of stimulus situations. Thesis, University of Chicago, 1931; published in part in J. educ. Psychol., 23, no. 6, Sept. 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C. I. The generalization of conditioned responses: I. The sensory generalization of conditioned responses with ranging frequencies of tone. J. gen. Psychol., 1937, 17, 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C. I. The generalization of conditioned responses: II. The generalization of conditioned responses with varying intensities of tone. J. genet. Psychol., 1937, 30, 279–291.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I. The generalization of conditioned responses: III. Extinction, spontaneous recovery, and disinhibition of conditioned and of generalized responses. J. exp. Psychol., 1937, 21, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C. I. The generalization of conditioned responses: IV. The effect of varying amounts of reinforcement upon the degree of generalization of conditioned responses. J. exp. Psychol., 1937, 21, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, C. L. et al. Mathematico-deductive theory of rote-learning, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. The problem of stimulus-equivalence in behavior theory. Psychol. Rev., 1939, 46, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, C. L. Mind, mechanism, and adaptive behavior. Psychol. Rev., 1937, 44, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, L. H. The effect of random alternations of reinforcement and extinction on the acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid responses. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 25, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, G. The nature of learning in its relation to the living system, New York: D. Appleton Century, 1938.Google Scholar
Kappauf, W. S. and Schlosberg, H. Conditioned responses in the white rat: III. Conditioning as a function of the length of the period of delay. J. genet. Psychol., 1937, 50, 27–45.Google Scholar
Kellogg, W. N. and Wolf, I. S. The nature of the reaction retained after several varieties of conditioning in the same subjects. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 24, 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupalov, P. S. Gantt, W. H. The relation between the strength of the conditioned stimulus and the size of the resulting conditioned reflex. Brain, 1927, 54, 83–98.Google Scholar
Miller, J. The effect of inhibitory and facilitory attitudes on eyelid conditioning. Abstract in Psychol. Bull., 1939, 36, 377–378.Google Scholar
Münzinger, K. F. and Dove, C. C. Serial learning: I. Gradients of uniformity and variability produced by success and failure. J. gen. Psychol., 1937, 16, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. Conditioned reflexes: an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex, London: Oxford University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. In Gantt, W. H.(Eds.), Lectures on conditioned reflexes, New York: International Publishers, 1928.Google Scholar
Rashevsky, N. Mathematical biophysics, physicomathematical foundations of biology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Rashevsky, N. Advances and applications of mathematical biology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Razran, G. H. S. Transposition of relational responses and generalization of conditioned responses. Psychol. Rev., 1938, 45, 532–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razran, G. H. S. The nature of the extinctive process. Psychol. Rev., 1939, 46, 264–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodnick, E. H. Characteristics of delayed and trace-conditioned responses. J. exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodnick, E. H. Does the interval of delay of conditioned responses possess inhibitory properties?. J. exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosberg, H. An investigation of certain factors related to ease of conditioning. J. gen. Psychol., 1932, 7, 328–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis, New York: D. Appleton-Century, 1938.Google Scholar
Spence, K. W. Analysis of the formation of visual discrimination habits in the chimpanzee. J. comp. Psychol., 1937, 22, 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, K. W. The differential response in animals to stimuli ranging within a single dimension. Psychol. Rev., 1937, 44, 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Switzer, S. A. Anticipatory and inhibitory characteristics of delayed conditioned reactions. J. exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 409–425.Google Scholar
Switzer, S. A. Anticipatory and inhibitory characteristics of delayed conditioned reactions. J. exp. Psychol., 1934, 17, 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. The psychology of wants, interests, and attitudes, New York: D. Appleton-Century, 1935.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. Theory of functionals, London: Blackie and Son, Limited, 1931.Google Scholar
Williams, S. B. Resistance to extinction as a function of the number of reinforcements. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 23, 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfle, H. M. Conditioning as a function of the interval between the conditioned and the original stimulus. J. gen. Psychol., 1932, 7, 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youtz, R. E. P. Reinforcement, extinction, and spontaneous recovery in a non-Pavlovian reaction. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 22, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youtz, R. E. P. The change with time of a Thorndikian response in the rat. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 23, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youtz, R.E.P. The weakening of one Thorndikian response following the extinction of another. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 24, 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar