Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-szhh2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:42:44.582Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

Multilevel Dynamic Generalized Structured Component Analysis for Brain Connectivity Analysis in Functional Neuroimaging Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Kwanghee Jung*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Yoshio Takane
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Heungsun Hwang
Affiliation:
McGill University
Todd S. Woodward
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
Correspondence should be made to Kwanghee Jung, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Learning Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin UCT 2373J, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Email: kwanghee.jung@uth.tmc.edu

Abstract

We extend dynamic generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) to enhance its data-analytic capability in structural equation modeling of multi-subject time series data. Time series data of multiple subjects are typically hierarchically structured, where time points are nested within subjects who are in turn nested within a group. The proposed approach, named multilevel dynamic GSCA, accommodates the nested structure in time series data. Explicitly taking the nested structure into account, the proposed method allows investigating subject-wise variability of the loadings and path coefficients by looking at the variance estimates of the corresponding random effects, as well as fixed loadings between observed and latent variables and fixed path coefficients between latent variables. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach by applying the method to the multi-subject functional neuroimaging data for brain connectivity analysis, where time series data-level measurements are nested within subjects.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9440-6.

References

Cairo, T.A., Woodward, T.S., Ngan, E.T. (2006). Decreased encoding efficiency in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 59, 740746CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, G., Glen, D.R., Saad, Z.S., Hamilton, J.P., Thomason, M.E., Gotlib, I.H., Cox, R.W. (2011). Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 41, 11421155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
deLeeuw, J., Young, F.W., Takane, Y. (1976). Additive structure in qualitative data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 41, 471503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans, Philadelphia: SIAMCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K.J. (1994). Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 5678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, K.M., Molenaar, P.C., Hillary, F.G., Slobounov, S. (2011). Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data. NeuroImage, 54, 11511158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greve, D.N., Brown, G.G., Mueller, B.A., Glover, G., Liu, T.T. (2013). A survey of the sources of noise in fMRI. Psychometrika, 78, 396416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, H., Takane, Y. (2004). Generalized structured component analysis. Psychometrika, 69, 8199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H., Takane, Y. (2014). Generalized structured component analysis: A component-based approach to structural equation modeling, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. (forthcoming)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H., Ho, R.M., Lee, J. (2010). Generalized structured component analysis with latent interactions. Psychometrika, 75, 228242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, K., Takane, Y., Hwang, H., Woodward, T.S. (2012). Dynamic GSCA (Generalized Structured Component Analysis) with applications to the analysis of effective connectivity in functional neuroimaging data. Psychometrika, 77, 827848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P.M., Ernst, T. (2007). Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 8593CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snijders, T., Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling, London: Sage PublicationGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y. (2013). Constrained principal component analysis and related techniques, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y., Hunter, M.A. (2001). Constrained principal component analysis: A comprehensive theory. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing, 12, 391419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y., Shibayama, T. (1991). Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables. Psychometrika, 56, 97120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Den Heuvel, M.P., Hulshoff Pol, H.E. (2010). Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 20, 519534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, T.S., Cairo, T.A., Ruff, C.C., Takane, Y., Hunter, M.A., Ngan, E.T.C. (2006). Functional connectivity reveals load dependent neural systems underlying encoding and maintenance in verbal working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 317325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed