Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T15:15:58.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orthogonal Procrustes Rotation Maximizing Congruence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Frank B. Brokken*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
*
Correspondence should be sent to Frank Brokken, Department of Education, University of Groningen, Westerhaven 16, k. 902, 9718 AW Groningen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Procedures for assessing the invariance of factors found in data sets using different subjects and the same variables are often using the least squares criterion, which appears to be too restrictive for comparing factors.

Tucker's coefficient of congruence, on the other hand, is more closely related to the human interpretation of factorial invariance than the least squares criterion. A method maximizing simultaneously the sum of coefficients of congruence between two matrices of factor loadings, using orthogonal rotation of one matrix is presented. As shown in examples, the sum of coefficients of congruence obtained using the presented rotation procedure is slightly higher than the sum of coefficients of congruence using Orthogonal Procrustes Rotation based on the least squares criterion.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author is obliged to Lewis R. Goldberg for critically reviewing the first draft of this paper.

References

Reference Note

Brokken, F. B. Orthogonal rotation to achieve congruence. Paper presented at the Spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Chapel Hill, May 1981.Google Scholar

Reference

Bock, R. D. Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
Cliff, N. Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Andrade, R. G. Trait psychology and componential analysis. American Anthropologist, 1965, 67, 215228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F. The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 429440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haven, S. & Ten Berge, J. M. F. Tucker's coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: an empirical study. Heymans Bulletin 290 EX 1977. Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, 1977.Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 574583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selby, S. M. Standard mathematical tables, Cleveland: The Chemical Rubber Co., 1972.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. A method for synthesis of factor analytic studies, Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar