Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T04:47:29.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Parameters of the Social Relations Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Steffen Nestler
Steffen Nestler*
Affiliation:
University of Münster
*
Correspondence should be made to Steffen Nestler, University of Münster, Fliednerstr. 21, 48149 Münster, Germany. Email: steffen.nestler@wwu.de; steffen.nestler@uni-muenster.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many areas of research, the round-robin design is used to study interpersonal judgments and behaviors. The resulting data are analyzed with the social relations model (SRM), whereby almost all previously published studies have used ANOVA-based methods or multilevel-based methods to obtain SRM parameter estimates. In this article, the SRM is embedded into the linear mixed model framework, and it is shown how restricted maximum likelihood can be employed to estimate the SRM parameters. It is also described how the effect of covariates on the SRM-specific effects can be estimated. An example is presented to illustrate the approach. We also present the results of a simulation study in which the performance of the proposed approach is compared to the ANOVA method.

Keywords

social relations modellinear mixed modelrestricted maximum likelihoodcovariates
Type
Article
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 1098 - 1117
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is dedicated to Irmgard Laufer.

References

Bond, C. F., Lashley, B. R. (1996). Round-robin analysis of social interaction: Exact and estimated standard errors. Psychometrika, 61, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonito, J. A., Kenny, D. A. (2010). (2004). The measurement of reliability of social relations components from round-robin designs. Personal Relationships, 17, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demidenko, E. Mixed models: Theory and Applications with R, 2Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Genz, A., Bretz, F., Miwa, T., Mi, X., Leisch, F., Scheipl, F., & Hothorn, T. (2015). Mvtnorm: Multivariate normal and t distributions. Retrieved February 24, 2015, from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mvtnorm.Google Scholar
Gill, P. S., Swartz, T. B. (2001). Statistical analyses for round robin interaction data. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 29, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, E. M., Collier, W. G., Oxford, J. A., Bond, C. F., Dansereau, D. F. (1998). (2007). (1994). (1998). (2007). Individual differences in dyadic cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J. Linear and Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Their Applications, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis, New York: Guilford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. SOREMO (Computer Software and Manual), Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A. Estimation of SRM Using Specialized Software, Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Livi, S., Yammarino, F. J., Dansereau, F. (2009). A componential analysis of leadership using the social relations model. Multi-level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Leadership, Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., Kashy, D. A. (1994). (2006). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the big five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., Cook, W. L. The Analysis of Dyadic Data, New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Küfner, ACP, Nestler, S., Back, M. D. (2012). The two pathways to being an (un-)popular narcissist. Journal of Personality, 81, 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, C., Van der Vegt, G. S., Walter, F., Huang, X. (2011). Harming high performers: Social comparison and interpersonal harming in work teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 588–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lashley, B. R., Bond, C. F. (1997). Significance testing for round robin data. Psychological Methods, 2, 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashley, B. R., Kenny, D. A. (1998). Power estimation in social relations analyses. Psychological Methods, 3, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Loken, E. (2002). A unified theory of statistical analysis and inference for variance component models for dyadic data. Statistica Sinica, 12, 519–535.Google Scholar
Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Kenny, D. A., Trautwein, U. (2013). (2004). A general and flexible approach to estimating the social relations model using Bayesian methods. Psychological Methods, 18, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCulloch, C. E., Searle, S. R., Neuhaus, J. M. Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models, 2Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nestler, S., Grimm, K. J., Schönbrodt, F. D. (2015). The social consequences and mechanisms of personality: How to analyse longitudinal data from individual, dyadic, round-robin and network designs. European Journal of Personality, 29, 272–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Schaalje, G. B., McBride, J. B., Fellingham, G. W. (2002). Adequacy of approximations to distributions of test statistics in complex linear mixed models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 7, 512–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönbrodt, F. D., Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C. (2012). (1992). TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönbrodt, F. D., Back, M. D., & Schmukle, S. C. (2015). TripleR: A package for round robin analyses using R. Retrieved February 24, 2015, from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TripleR.Google Scholar
Searle, S. R., Casella, G., McCulloch, C. E. Variance Components, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, TAB, Kenny, D. A. (1999). (2009). The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach. Personal Relationships, 6, 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, G., Molenberghs, G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Warner, R. M., Kenny, D. A., Stoto, M. (1979). A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1742–1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, G. Y. (1982). Round robin analysis of variance via maximum likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 714–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar