Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-szhh2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:43:34.019Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restricted Multidimensional Scaling Models for Asymmetric Proximities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

David G. Weeks  and
P. M. Bentler
David G. Weeks*
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine
P. M. Bentler
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to David G. Weeks, Washington University School of Medicine, 369 North Taylor, St. Louis, Missouri 63108.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Restricted multidimensional scaling models [Bentler & Weeks, 1978] allowing constraints on parameters, are extended to the case of asymmetric data. Separate functions are used to model the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the data. The approach is also extended to the case in which data are presumed to be linearly related to squared distances. Examples of several models are provided, using journal citation data. Possible extensions of the models are considered.

Keywords

multidimensional scalingasymmetric data
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 201 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported in part by USPHS Grant 0A01070, P. M. Bentler, principal investigator, and NIMH Grant MH-24819, E. J. Anthony and J. Worland, principal investigators.

The authors wish to thank E. W. Holman and several anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions concerning this research.

References

Reference Notes

Chino, N. A unified geometrical interpretation of the MDS techniques for the analysis of asymmetry and related techniques. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, May, 1980.Google Scholar
Harshman, R. S. Models for analysis of symmetrical relationships among N objects or stimuli. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychometric Society and the Society for Mathematical Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, August, 1978.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. W. Network representations of asymmetric data. Paper presented at the Berkeley-Stanford joint meeting in Biological and Cognitive Psychology, Stanford, May, 1980.Google Scholar
Young, F. W. An asymmetric euclidean model for multi-process asymmetric data. Proceedings of the U.S.-Japan Seminar, University of California, San Diego, August, 1975.Google Scholar

References

Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. Restricted multidimensional scaling models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1978, 17, 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. W., & Holland, P. W. Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice, 1975, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloxom, B. Constrained multidimensional scaling inN spaces. Psychometrika, 1978, 43, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantine, A. G., & Gower, J. C. Graphical representation of asymmetric matrices. Applied Statistics, 1978, 27, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, C. H. A theory of data, 1964, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H., Dawes, R. M., & Tversky, A. Mathematical psychology: An elementary introduction, 1969, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. P. Free trees and bidirectional trees as representations of psychological distance. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1978, 17, 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, J. C. The analysis of asymmetry and orthogonality. In Barra, J. R., Brodeau, F., Romier, G., & Van Clutsem, B. (Eds.), Recent developments in statistics, 1977, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Holman, E. W. Monotonic models for asymmetric proximities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1979, 20, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & de Leeuw, J. Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 7–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobler, W. Spatial interaction patterns. Journal of Environmental Systems, 1976, 6, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobler, W. R. Estimation of attractivities from interactions. Environment and Planning A, 1979, 11, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar