Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:29:11.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chronology of the Subotiv Settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Victor I. Klochko ,
Nikolai N. Kovaliukh ,
Vadim V. Skripkin  and
Ingo Motzenbecker
Victor I. Klochko
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 12 Heroyev Stalingrada Ave., Kiev 254655 Ukraine
Nikolai N. Kovaliukh
Affiliation:
State Scientific Center of Environmental Radiogeochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 34 Palladin Ave., Kiev 142, 252680 Ukraine
Vadim V. Skripkin
Affiliation:
State Scientific Center of Environmental Radiogeochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 34 Palladin Ave., Kiev 142, 252680 Ukraine
Ingo Motzenbecker
Affiliation:
Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Eurazien Abteilung, Postfach 330014, D-14191 Berlin, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Samples collected at the Chornoliska culture site near the village of Subotiv, Cherkasy region during the 1994–1995 Ukrainian-German expedition were radiocarbon dated in Kiev. The foundation of the Subotiv settlement dates to 1300–1200 cal BC. A skeleton found in one of the buildings at this site is dated at the end of the early period (between 1120 and 1040 cal BC). In the youngest part (a small town) of the Subotiv settlement, we found the remains of a “building sacrifice"—the skeleton of a teenager. The average calibrated date for this skeleton is 834–807 cal BC, whereas the timber from the rampart dates between 902–810 cal BC. Thus, the rampart was apparently built between 834–807 cal BC. Among the objects found on the site were Arzhan-type bone arrowheads. Such arrowheads, when found in Eastern Europe, are believed to indicate the military expansion of Proto-Scythian nomads. The Sargary settlement in western Kazakhstan dates to 960–820 cal BC, the Arzhan arrow in Siberia to 960–850 cal BC. We assume that the Chornogorivka complexes in eastern Eurasia date to the earlier time period (960–820) than those in western Eurasia (834–807). The time of the Chornogorivka expansion on the territory of Ukraine is therefore within the range 834 to 820 BC.

Type
Part 2: Applications
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 40 , Issue 2: 16th International Radiocarbon Conference June 16-20, 1997 Part 2: Applications, Conference Editors: Willem G. Mook Johannes van der Plicht , 1997 , pp. 667 - 673
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Avanesova, N. A. 1991 Culture of Shepherd Tribes in the Bronze Age in the Asian Part of the USSR (Based on Metal Wares). Tashkent: 200 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Chochorowski, J. 1995 Dating of the Cimmerian Horizon in Central Europe and Late Bronze Age Prahistorychne , Vol. 4. Katovice: 267–28 (in Polish).Google Scholar
Dubovskaya, O. P. 1993 Questions of composition of the Chornogorivska implement complex. Archeologicheski Almanac 2. Donetsk: 137–160 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Klochko, V. I. and Murzin, V. Y. 1987a About Interference of the Local and Introduced Elements of the Scythian Culture. Scythians of the Northern Black Sea Area. Kiev, Naukova Dumka: 12–19 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Klochko, V. I. and Murzin, V. Y. 1987b About dating of the Chornogorivska Novocherkask sites. Cimmerians and Scythians. Proceedings of the all–Union workshop devoted to the memory of Dr. A. I. Ternozhkin. Kirovograd: 73–75 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Klochko, V. I. and Murzin, V. Y. 1989 About the Chronology of Antiquities of the Chornogorivska Novocherkask. Problems of Archaeology of the Dnieper Area. Dnipropetrovsk, Dnipropetrovskiy University: 61–71 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Marsadolov, L. S., Zaitseva, G. I., Sementsov, A. A. and Lebedeva, L. M. 1996 Possibilities of radiocarbon dating to relate the variable scale of large burial mounds of the Saiano-Altai to the calendar. Radiocarbon and Archaeology (St. Petersburg): 1: 24–32 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Pearson, G. W. and Stuiver, M. 1986 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500–2500 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R., eds., Calibration Issue. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 839–862.Google Scholar
Skripkin, V. and Kovalyukh, N. 1998 Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER Laboratory for the routine preparation of lithium carbide. Radiocarbon , this issue.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Pearson, G. W. 1986 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–500 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R., eds., Calibration Issue. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 805–838.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J. 1993 The Groningen radiocarbon calibration program. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 231–237.Google Scholar
Terenoghkin, A. I. 1961 Pre-Scythian Period on the Right Bank of the Dnieper. Kiev, Naukova Dumka: 246 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Terenoghkin, A. I. 1971 The Cimmerians. Kiev, Naukova Dumka: 220 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zaitseva, G. I., Vasiliev, S. S., Marsadov, Z. S. et al. 1996 Employment of the mathematical statistics method for correlation of dendrochronological and radiocarbon data (basing on Saiano-Altai elite burial mounds' materials). Radiocarbon and Archeology (St. Petersburg) 1: 33–38 (in Russian).Google Scholar