Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:41:07.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elaboration on a radiological environmental impact assessment methodology for Northern environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2012

J. Barescut ,
D. Lariviere ,
T. Stocki ,
A. Hosseini ,
J.E. Brown ,
T. Evseeva ,
T. Sazykina ,
D. Oughton ,
E. Bleykh  and
T. Majstrenko
A. Hosseini
Affiliation:
Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, P.O. Box 55, N-1332 Østeras, Norway.
J.E. Brown
Affiliation:
Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, P.O. Box 55, N-1332 Østeras, Norway.
T. Evseeva
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Division RAS, Kommunistcheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia
T. Sazykina
Affiliation:
International Academy of Modern Knowledge, 19 Gurianova str., Obninsk, Kaluga region, 249038 Russia
D. Oughton
Affiliation:
University of Life Sciences, 1432 ÅS, Norway
E. Bleykh
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Division RAS, Kommunistcheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia
T. Majstrenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Division RAS, Kommunistcheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia
Get access

Abstract

The present work encompasses some key aspects of a 3-year long research project (INTRANOR) where the main focus has been specifically on environmental assessments for radiation exposure through application of existing methodologies and their adaptation to quantify transfer, exposure and effects in Boreal/Arctic ecosystems. Non-parametric statistical methods have been applied in order to estimate the threshold dose rates above which radiation effects can be expected in vertebrate organisms. In addition, industrial areas contaminated by uranium mill tailings and radium production wastes, in the Komi Republic, Russia, were selected as suitable sites to study further the effects of exposure to radiation under boreal conditions. Dose–effect relationships have been established for a few natural populations inhabiting this area. Analyses of data have allowed benchmarks to be established below which no decrease in reproductive capacity could be observed. Other work performed within the project includes the collation of data in relation to naturally occurring radionuclides and application of existing methodologies to characterise background radiation exposures. These dose-rates may be a suitable means of contextualising the exposure attributable to enhanced dose-rates arising from human activities. Finally, combined action of ionizing radiation and low temperature has been analyzed and mathematically modelled.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 46 , Issue 6: ICRER 2011 – International Conference on Radioecology & Environmental Radioactivity: Environment & Nuclear Renaissance , 2011 , pp. S765 - S770
Copyright
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Larsson C.M. J. Radiol. Prot. 24 (2004) A1-A13.
Brown J.E., Thørring H., Hosseini A. The “EPIC” impact assessment framework – a deliverablereport for EU Funded Project ICA2-CT-2000-10032. Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority,Østerås (2003) 175.
Larsson C.M. J. Environ. Radioact. 99(2008) 1364–1370.
ICRP. Environmental Protection: the Concept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants. ICRP Publication 108. Ann. ICRP 2008; 38 (4-6).
Sazykina, T.G. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, 75 (1998)219–222.
Sazykina, T.G., Jaworska, A. & Brown, J.E. (Eds.) (2003). Dose-effects relationships for reference (or related) Arctic biota. Deliverable Report 5 for the EPIC project (Contract no. ICA2-CT-200-10032). Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Østerås, pp. 119.
Brown J.E., Alfonso B., Avila R., Beresford N.A., Copplestone D., Pröhl G. J. Environ. Radioact. 99 (2008) 1371–1383.
Barrera M., Lourdes Romero M., Nuñez-Lagos R., Bernardo J.M. Analytica Chimica Acta 604 (2) (2007) 197–202.
Hosseini A., Brown J.E., Dowdall M., Standring W., Strand P., Environ Monit Assess 173 (2011) 653–667.
Hertel-Aas T., Oughton D.H., Jaworska A., Bjerke H., Salbu B., Brunborg G. Radiation Research 168 (2007) 515–526.
Garnier-Laplace J., Copplestone D., Gilbin R., Alonzo F., Ciffroy P., Gilek M., Agüero A., Björk M., Oughton D.H., Jaworska A., Larsson C.M., Hingston J.L. J. Environ. Radioact. 99 (9) (2008) 1474–1483.
Andersson P., Garnier-Laplace J., Beresford N.A., Copplestone D., Howard B.J., Howe P., Oughton D., Whitehouse P. J. Environ. Radioact. 100 (2009) 1100–1108.
EC, European Commission. Technical guidance document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances and Commission Regulation (EC) N 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxembourg 2003.
Sazykina T.G., Kryshev A.I., Sanina K.D. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 48 (2009) 391–404
Sazykina T.G., Kryshev A.I. Radia.t Environ. Biophys. 50 (2011) 105–114
Pentreath R J. J. Radiol Prot. 22 (1) (2002) 45–56.
Beresford N.A., Barnett C.L., Jones D.G., Wood M.D., Appleton J.D., Breward N., Copplestone D. J. Environ. Radioact. 99 (2008) 1430–1439.
Hosseini A., Beresford N.A., Brown J.E., Jones D.G., Phaneuf M., Thørring H., Yankovich T. J. Radiol. Prot. 30 (2010) 235–264.