Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T00:54:32.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Useful Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

Steven Saxonberg Open the ORCID record for Steven Saxonberg [Opens in a new window]
Steven Saxonberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
*
Email: saxonberg90@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following is a list of learning and research resources on topics that are central to this themed section, namely the male-breadwinner and adult worker models, and their alternatives; intersectionality; the views of employers and workplace culture; the role and influence of informal care; and the tendency toward dualisation.

Keywords

Dualisationemployer views and workplace cultureintersectionalityinformal caremale-breadwinner, adult worker models and alternatives
Type
Some Useful Sources
Information
Social Policy and Society , First View , pp. 1 - 2
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Critiques of the male-breadwinner and adult worker models, and alternatives to them

Crompton, R. (ed.) (1999) Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. (2011) ‘What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective’, Social Politics, 18, 1, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hantrais, L. (2004) Family Policy Matters, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, B., Fahlén, S. and Takás, J. (2011) ‘Agency and capabilities to achieve a work–life balance: a comparison of Sweden and Hungary’, Social Politics, 18, 2, 168–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxonberg, S. (2013) ‘From defamilization to degenderization: toward a new welfare typology’, Social Policy and Administration, 47, 1, 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurowska, A. (2018) (De)familialization and (de)genderization – competing or complementary perspectives in comparative policy analysis?’, Social Policy & Administration, 52, 1, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. (2003) ‘Varieties of familialism: the caring function of the family in comparative perspective’, European Societies, 5, 4, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. and Giullari, S. (2005) ‘The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: the search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach’, Economy and Society, 34, 1, 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (1994) ‘“She Has Other Duties”—Women, citizenship and social security’ in Baldwin, S. and Falkingham, J. (eds.), Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model, London, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 31–44.Google Scholar
Saxonberg, S. and Szelewa, D. (2021) ‘Reexamining degenderisation: changes in family policies in Europe’ in Castren, A. M., Cesnuityte, V., Crespi, I., Guathier, J. A., Gouveia, R., Martin, C., Minguez, A. M. and Suwada, K. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of family sociology in Europe, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Intersectionality

Few-Demo, A. L. and Allen, K. R. (2020) ‘Gender, feminist, and intersectional perspectives on families: a decade in review’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 82, 326–345, DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marra, M. (2020) ‘Intersectionality and emergence in time use analysis: possible pathways for gender research and work–family reconciliation policy in Italy, community’, Work & Family, 23, 1, 80–106, DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2018.1462146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. M. and Briggs, C. Q. (2019) ‘Improving work-life policy and practice with an intersectionality lens’, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 39, 5, 533–547, DOI: 10.1108/EDI-01-2019-0049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (2021) Social Policy: A Critical and Intersectional Analysis, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (2023) ‘Intersectionality and family policy: the transnational political economy of care’ in Daly, M., Pfau-Effinger, B., Gilbert, N. and Besharov, D. J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Family Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 182–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Employer views and workplace culture

Casper, W., Fox, K., Sitzmann, T., Landy, A. and Barling, J. (2004) ‘Supervisor referrals to work-family programs’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9, 2, 136–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correll, S., Benard, S. and Paik, I. (2007) ‘Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty?’, American Journal of Sociology, 112, 5, 1297–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, L., Allard, K. and Hwang, P. (2002) ‘The impact of organizational culture on men’s use of parental leave in Sweden’, Community, Work & Family, 5, 3, 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, L. and Hwang, C. P. (2019) ‘Policy is not enough–the influence of the gendered workplace on fathers’ use of parental leave in Sweden’, Community, Work & Family, 22, 1, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, W. H. (1992) ‘A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyas, L., Lee, S. and Chou, K. (2017) ‘Utilization of family-friendly policies in Hong Kong’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28, 20, 2893–2915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C. K., Chau, K. and Wong, T. (2002) ‘Neither welfare state nor welfare society: the case of Hong Kong’, Social Policy and Society, 1, 4, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Informal care

Brekke, I. and Nadim, M. (2017) ‘Gendered effects of intensified care burdens: employment and sickness absence in families with chronically sick or disabled children in Norway’, Work, Employment and Society, 31, 3, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Leon, M., Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J. and Vlachantoni, A. (2019) ‘The dynamics of social care and employment in mid-life’, Ageing and Society, 39, 2, 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussein, S. and Manthorpe, J. (2005) ‘An international review of the long-term care workforce: policies and shortages’, Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 17, 4, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMunn, A., Bird, L., Webb, E. and Sacker, A. (2020) ‘Gender divisions of paid and unpaid work in contemporary UK couples’, Work, Employment and Society, 34, 2, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, S. and Peng, I. (2012) ‘All in the family? Migrants, nationhood, and care regimes in Asia and North America’, Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 4, 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, K. M. (2020) ‘Employment trade-offs under different family policy constellations’, Work, Employment and Society, 35, 1, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souralová, A. (2020) ‘Vietnamese parents and Czech nannies: second-generation immigrant children and their educators’, Journal of Education Culture and Society, 5, 1, 320–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souralová, A. (2021) ‘“My parents did everything for us but nothing with us”: parenting and mothering in Vietnamese immigrant families in the Czech Republic’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 30, 1, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarum, H. and Kutsar, D. (2018) ‘Compulsory intergenerational family solidarity shaping choices between work and care: perceptions of informal female carers and local policymakers in Estonia’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 27, 1, 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teshuva, K., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Iecovich, E. and Golander, H. (2019) ‘Like one of the family? Understanding relationships between migrant live-in care workers and older care recipients in Israel’, Ageing and Society, 39, 7, 1387–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dualisation

Busemeyer, M. and Kemmerling, A. (2020) ‘Dualization, stratification, liberalization, or what? An attempt to clarify the conceptual underpinnings of the dualization debate’, Political Science Research and Methods, 8, 2, 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (eds.) (2012) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, D. (2014) ‘Dualization, crisis and the welfare state’, Socio-Economic Review, 12, 2, 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szelewa, D. and Polakowski, M. P. (2008) ‘Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 2, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar